My suggestion is to self custody your sats and don’t listen to developers and influencers on here ! You will thank me later 😉

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Always DYOR

Yes! I found out there are almost every third person have no clue what’s happening on here. Better to start warning them earlier

🫂

nostr:note16dcwm5gqyevmn8lh7lercjmcz2pa8zz9lrap0x9tc5xp85m5l3fqy508qd

My suggestion is you custody your sats with me. IMHO.

Custodial is merely the spendomg account. Savongs account is air gapped

100%

What are developers saying? 99% of Bitcoiners promote self custody.

Is this a response to Pablo's demo?

I'm not that techi to be able to judge on that.

Yes custodial wallets are bad, but still better than no wallet on nostr.

Its great for UX if a bitcoin noob installs its nostr client and instantly can receive zaps, even if he does not understand what he received. Then this user possibly will study and understand what's going on and falls in the rabbit hole.

But on the other side there is a higher chance that SATs could he lost.

Would be great if the clients give you a warning when you reached a defined threshold and automatically makes a lightning transfer to your set self custodial lightning wallet.

This topic is always brought up without talking of the amount. It always depends on the amount.

The argentine peso is absolute horseshit by any measure, continually being rugged. But I always hold some. Why? it's very convenient in my day to day. HOW MUCH i hold is the important question.

The whole point of bitcoin is to eliminate third parties and being able to self custody so you will not end up holding bags of IOU

I’ve always approached it as play around with what you’re comfortable losing. I have no problem using lightning and cashu etc but it’s my responsibility to only play with what I’m willing to lose

Lol bags? No, that was exactly my point. You always received zaps on your own node?