If Core had an ounce of respect for consensus, it would hold off on the Op_Return increase, and move forward with non-contentious changes only.

It doesn’t. Thus, we run Knots.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This is the way it should be anyways.

It is open sourced.

Anyone can modify it the way they want as long as it respect consensus rules.

Wait, they're changing policy to reflect consensus rules. I agree that they should have held off though. It's been debated for a while, but the vast majority of node runners were caught off guard, so naturally there's a backlash.

The only interesting is that the total number of nodes ho up.

Knots is irrelevant πŸ˜‚

An obvious attack

Antifragile mode kicks in

So long 'core'

The sleeper cell is being put to sleep

Pleb Toxicity Up.

This smells like a scam. Core is corrupted for sure. They'll have to drop the idea before launch.

Don't install v30.

v29 and v28 are still maintained https://bitcoincore.org/en/lifecycle/

I thought there’d be more than 20 something thousand nodes.

Indeed, which is why your node matters more than many would have you think.

20K something publicly listening nodes, some 70K total

Cryptocurrency Day trading is the only best way to grow your portfolio with the right strategy, i trading using signals from an expert trader, who i started trading with for over a year now. She’s is a professional indeed and with her guide and signals service I've made over ($900k)worth of crypto asset. Whoever will be interested in joining her trading program for growth should connect to her Catherine E. Russell on πŸ‘‰ WhatsApp +44 7480735379 she's reliable and also very legit πŸ’―

It is openly hostile

RunKnots