If Core had an ounce of respect for consensus, it would hold off on the Op_Return increase, and move forward with non-contentious changes only.
It doesnβt. Thus, we run Knots.

If Core had an ounce of respect for consensus, it would hold off on the Op_Return increase, and move forward with non-contentious changes only.
It doesnβt. Thus, we run Knots.

This is the way it should be anyways.
It is open sourced.
Anyone can modify it the way they want as long as it respect consensus rules.
Wait, they're changing policy to reflect consensus rules. I agree that they should have held off though. It's been debated for a while, but the vast majority of node runners were caught off guard, so naturally there's a backlash.
The only interesting is that the total number of nodes ho up.
Knots is irrelevant π
An obvious attack
Antifragile mode kicks in
So long 'core'
The sleeper cell is being put to sleep
Pleb Toxicity Up.
This smells like a scam. Core is corrupted for sure. They'll have to drop the idea before launch.
Don't install v30.
v29 and v28 are still maintained https://bitcoincore.org/en/lifecycle/
Cryptocurrency Day trading is the only best way to grow your portfolio with the right strategy, i trading using signals from an expert trader, who i started trading with for over a year now. Sheβs is a professional indeed and with her guide and signals service I've made over ($900k)worth of crypto asset. Whoever will be interested in joining her trading program for growth should connect to her Catherine E. Russell on π WhatsApp +44 7480735379 she's reliable and also very legit π―
It is openly hostile
RunKnots