Chanel is Chanel because they blend their own perfumes.
Rolex is Rolex because they build their own watches
Cartier is Cartier because they make their own jewelry.
Hermès is Hermès because they craft their own bags.
All these brands are not only selling things but bastion of expertise, savoir-faire and craftsmanship.
If your brand delegates all these to someone else, I simply can't take you seriously. It isn't the same business. We aren't building the same thing.
Why does it matter whether they outsource it or keep it in-house? At the end of the day, it’s all just people creating something and putting a company’s logo on it.
That is exactly the difference. One of them create while the other slap a logo on it.
It's not 'wrong', but it's not the same thing. One of them is a glorified distributor. The world need them but they can't exist without the creators.
Personally I see a world where Bitcoin brands do not simply gather enough money so they can hire chanel expertise to sell perfumes. That is very Proof-Of-Stake. I see a world where they put in the work to aquire expertise, build infrastructure and compete with chanel as creators.
#Bitcoin is #Bitcoin because it issues its own money.
🦢👀
👀 I don't get it 😂
There's a bitcoin company that is the exact opposite of what you say. Named after a bird that is almost always white.
