Some books only apeal to a small crowd. I'm guessing there are some genuine 5 star reviews on those books.
I'm 10 days into my 90. Meat and salt only.
I've seen many of your YouTube videos—thanks for your great work.
Not sure if milk counts as a "superfood". It doesn't work for many people.
What's more serious?
The fact that people believe in having other people rule over them.
It's interesting how easily justified outrage can be dismissed by labeling the outraged people something undesirable.
Did you lable the George Floyd rioters sililarly?
Wrong. Don't use bullets or ballots. Just stop participating in imoral bullshit.
I've seen this done in real life, south of Portland, Oregon along I5.
I did a tripple-take, not believing my eyes.
You keep saying "not for daily transactions". I never said anything about daily transactions, we have layer 2 for that.
My point is that if someone wants to save in BTC they shouldn't have to pay a weeks wages to have the security of layer 1.
I mean if it's cheaper to run a node than to do a transaction once a month something seems off.
Drink liquids. With electrolytes are even better.
Also, a high fat diet the day before and during. (Obviously I mean good fats like beef and avocado.)
Before Satoshi solved the Byzentien Generals problem it was thought to be impossible by many.
Let us think like Satoshi and solve layer 1 throughput.
My guess is that it's possible.
First, good on anyone that can get out of giving money to terrorist organizations/mafia/warmngers/governments.
Second, that scenario wouldn't work. You can only write off, at most, 50% of your income for charitable donations.
You sound like an out of touch politician who hasn't eaten at a fast food restaurant, or changed their own oil in 30 years.
It's very hard to get this point across. And I feel like I fail most of the time.
What's the point of having "money for everyone" if only a third of the people on Earth can afford to use it in its decentralized form.
Just like the current banking system, only the rich will have real access.
It doesn't matter if "anyone can run a Bitcoin node" if not anyone can afford to do a transaction on that node.
There is a difference between reasonable FUD like you are talking about, and fomenting unwarranted FUD.
When I hear/read someone saying something is FUD I assume they mean hyperbolic fearmongering.
The current atmosphere around BTC here on nostr on how to use Bitcoin is very reminisant of the Linux on desktop zelots of 20ish years ago.
You're a bunch of people in complete denial about how most people are willing to do things.
If you continue with this attitude; what we will get is someone like Google turning Bitcoin into a giant spyware honeypot just like they did with Linux when they created Android.
If you want people to have soverenty you need to make it easy, because you'll never make people change.
Keep preaching and we lose.
Get to fucking work, or don't. The outcome is up to the few that are willing to do the thankless work, not the evangelists.





