我用https://www.chatpdf.com/ 总结了一下 Deflation and Liberty这本书。
假设总结无误的话，作者描述的是一个用commodity作为backing，汇率会变的货币系统。我觉得这样的系统相当好。但和把BTC直接货币化（或搞1：1不变汇率的货币）差太远了
Q：then according to the author, who decides the exchange rate of the currency and the underlying commodity
A: According to the author of "Deflation and Liberty," the exchange rate between the currency and the underlying commodity would be determined by market forces of supply and demand.
Q: then according to the author, who will be the organization issue this currency?
A: According to the author of "Deflation and Liberty," the government should not produce money or appoint a special agency to produce money in a commodity-based monetary system. Instead, the author argues that the government should keep its hands off and allow the market to determine the supply of money. In this system, private individuals and firms would be free to issue their own currencies backed by a commodity such as gold or silver. These currencies would compete with each other in the marketplace, and their value would be determined by market forces of supply and demand. The author suggests that this decentralized approach to currency issuance would promote competition, innovation, and efficiency in the monetary system. However, it is important to note that this is just one perspective on monetary policy, and there are many other approaches that have been proposed by economists and policymakers over the years.
Q: what if these company decide to scheme together to artificially inflate this currency?
A: The author of "Deflation and Liberty" does not specifically address the possibility of companies scheming together to artificially inflate a currency in a commodity-based monetary system. However, it is worth noting that in any monetary system, there is always the potential for individuals or groups to engage in fraudulent or manipulative behavior. The author suggests that a commodity-based monetary system would provide a more stable and predictable monetary environment than a fiat money system, but it is not immune to abuse or manipulation. In order to prevent such abuses, the author suggests that there should be strong legal protections against fraud and other forms of financial misconduct, as well as effective regulatory oversight to ensure that market participants are acting in accordance with the law. Ultimately, the success of any monetary system depends on the integrity and honesty of its participants, as well as the effectiveness of its legal and regulatory framework.
Q: what decide the circulation amount of that commodity money
A: In a free market for money, the quantity of money is determined by the demand for money and the supply of money. The demand for money is determined by people's desire to hold cash balances, while the supply of money is determined by the production of commodity money. (Page 6) Therefore, the circulation amount of commodity money would be decided by market forces of supply and demand.
My take on why BTC as a currency is not feasible
#[2]
我用https://www.chatpdf.com/ 总结了一下 Deflation and Liberty这本书。
假设总结无误的话，作者描述的是一个用commodity作为backing，汇率会变的货币系统。我觉得这样的系统相当好。但和把BTC直接货币化（或搞1：1不变汇率的货币）差太远了
Q：then according to the author, who decides the exchange rate of the currency and the underlying commodity
A: According to the author of "Deflation and Liberty," the exchange rate between the currency and the underlying commodity would be determined by market forces of supply and demand.
Q: then according to the author, who will be the organization issue this currency?
A: According to the author of "Deflation and Liberty," the government should not produce money or appoint a special agency to produce money in a commodity-based monetary system. Instead, the author argues that the government should keep its hands off and allow the market to determine the supply of money. In this system, private individuals and firms would be free to issue their own currencies backed by a commodity such as gold or silver. These currencies would compete with each other in the marketplace, and their value would be determined by market forces of supply and demand. The author suggests that this decentralized approach to currency issuance would promote competition, innovation, and efficiency in the monetary system. However, it is important to note that this is just one perspective on monetary policy, and there are many other approaches that have been proposed by economists and policymakers over the years.
Q: what if these company decide to scheme together to artificially inflate this currency?
A: The author of "Deflation and Liberty" does not specifically address the possibility of companies scheming together to artificially inflate a currency in a commodity-based monetary system. However, it is worth noting that in any monetary system, there is always the potential for individuals or groups to engage in fraudulent or manipulative behavior. The author suggests that a commodity-based monetary system would provide a more stable and predictable monetary environment than a fiat money system, but it is not immune to abuse or manipulation. In order to prevent such abuses, the author suggests that there should be strong legal protections against fraud and other forms of financial misconduct, as well as effective regulatory oversight to ensure that market participants are acting in accordance with the law. Ultimately, the success of any monetary system depends on the integrity and honesty of its participants, as well as the effectiveness of its legal and regulatory framework.
#[2]
我用https://www.chatpdf.com/ 总结了一下 Deflation and Liberty这本书。
假设总结无误的话，作者描述的是一个用commodity作为backing，汇率会变的货币系统。我觉得这样的系统相当好。但和把BTC直接货币化（或搞1：1不变汇率的货币）差太远了
Q：then according to the author, who decides the exchange rate of the currency and the underlying commodity
A: According to the author of "Deflation and Liberty," the exchange rate between the currency and the underlying commodity would be determined by market forces of supply and demand.
Q: then according to the author, who will be the organization issue this currency?
A: According to the author of "Deflation and Liberty," the government should not produce money or appoint a special agency to produce money in a commodity-based monetary system. Instead, the author argues that the government should keep its hands off and allow the market to determine the supply of money. In this system, private individuals and firms would be free to issue their own currencies backed by a commodity such as gold or silver. These currencies would compete with each other in the marketplace, and their value would be determined by market forces of supply and demand. The author suggests that this decentralized approach to currency issuance would promote competition, innovation, and efficiency in the monetary system. However, it is important to note that this is just one perspective on monetary policy, and there are many other approaches that have been proposed by economists and policymakers over the years.
Q: what if these company decide to scheme together to artificially inflate this currency?
A: The author of "Deflation and Liberty" does not specifically address the possibility of companies scheming together to artificially inflate a currency in a commodity-based monetary system. However, it is worth noting that in any monetary system, there is always the potential for individuals or groups to engage in fraudulent or manipulative behavior. The author suggests that a commodity-based monetary system would provide a more stable and predictable monetary environment than a fiat money system, but it is not immune to abuse or manipulation. In order to prevent such abuses, the author suggests that there should be strong legal protections against fraud and other forms of financial misconduct, as well as effective regulatory oversight to ensure that market participants are acting in accordance with the law. Ultimately, the success of any monetary system depends on the integrity and honesty of its participants, as well as the effectiveness of its legal and regulatory framework.
题外话，我觉得其实这也是stablecoin在进化的方向，有超额质押的decentralized stablecoin能活久一点，对市场的渗透再广阔一点，基本就是它说的那个东西。会变成stablecoin和国家发行币之间的争夺控制权关系。
我用https://www.chatpdf.com/ 总结了一下 Deflation and Liberty这本书。
假设总结无误的话，作者描述的是一个用commodity作为backing，汇率会变的货币系统。我觉得这样的系统相当好。但和把BTC直接货币化（或搞1：1不变汇率的货币）差太远了
Q：then according to the author, who decides the exchange rate of the currency and the underlying commodity
A: According to the author of "Deflation and Liberty," the exchange rate between the currency and the underlying commodity would be determined by market forces of supply and demand.
Q: then according to the author, who will be the organization issue this currency?
A: According to the author of "Deflation and Liberty," the government should not produce money or appoint a special agency to produce money in a commodity-based monetary system. Instead, the author argues that the government should keep its hands off and allow the market to determine the supply of money. In this system, private individuals and firms would be free to issue their own currencies backed by a commodity such as gold or silver. These currencies would compete with each other in the marketplace, and their value would be determined by market forces of supply and demand. The author suggests that this decentralized approach to currency issuance would promote competition, innovation, and efficiency in the monetary system. However, it is important to note that this is just one perspective on monetary policy, and there are many other approaches that have been proposed by economists and policymakers over the years.
Q: what if these company decide to scheme together to artificially inflate this currency?
A: The author of "Deflation and Liberty" does not specifically address the possibility of companies scheming together to artificially inflate a currency in a commodity-based monetary system. However, it is worth noting that in any monetary system, there is always the potential for individuals or groups to engage in fraudulent or manipulative behavior. The author suggests that a commodity-based monetary system would provide a more stable and predictable monetary environment than a fiat money system, but it is not immune to abuse or manipulation. In order to prevent such abuses, the author suggests that there should be strong legal protections against fraud and other forms of financial misconduct, as well as effective regulatory oversight to ensure that market participants are acting in accordance with the law. Ultimately, the success of any monetary system depends on the integrity and honesty of its participants, as well as the effectiveness of its legal and regulatory framework.
这是社会发展必然的，不建立工会，难道每次都要慢慢号召个几年，到社会真的矛盾到极点才罢工吗。
我觉得现代的技术在人口数量不是剧增的情况下，越来越接近“只需要付出极少量人力资源，就能满足大众的衣食住行了”； 这个时候还不让政府去接管那些行业，那真的会大规模饿死人；而且还是在技术允许的情况下，会相当魔幻。
人民要做的是去制约政府利用这种控制力去作恶。这个我觉得比防止企业利用这些生产力作恶简单多了，因为肯定1. 很多人在那些企业打工，会有很多利害关系 2. 多个上下游的企业太分散了，不好拉仇恨。而政府作为目标太明确了，说的不好一点，发生暴力事件也不太会误伤
父母也只是有血缘关系的人，人和人之前因为共识而产生的亲近就很难达到了。而我们还被传统文化，娱乐文化等灌输 和父母亲人之间肯定会很亲近 这样的观念，所以大部分人和父母的关系才会这么挣扎
哦，不过我只是说为啥相似的教义在不同国家表现很不同。我不知道“宗教的本意是教化人们的德性，使其有益于社会” 的合理性有多少，发达国家还是有不少人觉得被宗教家庭压迫的，但他们能去别的地方
我觉得很简单啊，在发达国家 多文化交融下是建立了很多底层共识的，例如法律不允许用这些因素来压迫别人，例如女性带不带头巾，可不可以婚前性交。这些也只有多文化交融才可能这么快发展出来，因为你的文化认可的不代表别人要认可，不想一直打打杀杀 就要建立这些规则。事实证明 大家的信仰也没这么严格，退让一点建立普世共识是没问题的
其实我一直觉得 “是否是无神论“ 相比 ”是否是不可知论“ 而言没那么重要，有神论基本都可以归为可知论，底层有超自然的事物在运作。
但我觉得真正逻辑思考的人都是 不可知论，因为这个世界对人类的预测能力而言就是这么混沌。连建立一个预测股市的模型都难，更别提建立绝对的单一的一个精准的引导社会运作的模型了。 （这和多个模型引导和竞争很不同，符合不可知论的特性）
我觉得这也是独裁/思想单一的国家最不可以相信的地方，因为有一个压倒性主流的声音 会说 ”只要这样这样做，你就能幸福“”观察现象 ---》 指定模型 ---》分配执行任务“ 每一步里都牵涉太多因素和可能性了。所以我一直觉得不是 更民主的制度 更”正确“，而是他们容错率高几个量级。 把所有资源都投向一个方向，可能开始的时候很有效，但之后就非常混沌了。 更何况这只是建立在会认错，会转向调整政策 那种独裁/思想单一国家上。
我不知道国内宗教到底有没有被打压
阴阳怪气 和 直接了当地说“中共打压人民” /“中共不能代表中国人民” 这里差别太大了；这就是洗脑/引导和导致不能自主思考的环境的一个重要的因素啊。因为不能只能大概知道有问题，但不能建立更好的观念。
从我们之前的聊天中，你似乎觉得“能绕过自由平等这些普世价值建立更好的社会”？不是批判，我猜错的话不好意思。不过假如是这样的话，这是我们的一个很大的分歧点，我觉得 普世价值/LGBTQ权益/多种族融合，这些就是现代人权形成的基石，在没有现在看来像科幻一样的新的因素出现的话，想弯道超车只会翻车
例如，“你我不也找到这个地方自由发言吗” 这不是极少数极少数人吗，所以大部分的人形成了现在中国这样社会很正常啊。
国内的舆论环境，不论是不是被引导/洗脑，我觉得已经纳粹化很严重了；头脑逻辑正常的话，在这种环境下都会很容易觉得不幸
其实我不建议用android，就算国内魔改的系统本身没什么问题，也太多漏洞了
iris越来越反人类了，把following和feeds合并在一起就不说了。
每次想看following的内容，不算加载时间了，能一次加载出来的概率低于1/10。 其他的情况，要么是直接空白，要么是加载出很久以前的内容。 这还是在连接上30+ ~40个relay的情况下。导致每次都要刷新好几遍
vpn比较灰色地带，不是钓鱼执法 你又很不幸运被捉，还要手机一翻都是“反动言论”的话，没什么问题。太多人工作需要了，这也是vpn灰色法不责众的地方。（可以利用这点，例如说经常开几个github页面刷）
不过你连relay就很不一样了，isp已经知道了。只是还没有捉人，要捉的话很明确会是直接找手机里的damus, amethyst 和 iris这类记录。那其实和你互动的人“反动”一点，你都很可能被拿去冲KPI了
AI色图已经在twitter开始流传了，不过暂时质量确实不怎么样，需要某些pose和角度才不会一眼假
不说中共是不是宗教的问题，其实中国人一直对有神论信仰很足啊，只是可能在新中国后由于各种原因，没有很具体的信仰方向和宗教活动。
似乎最近基督教已经在沿海农村地区生根发芽，我觉得是因为基督教还没被系统打压过的原因。
我觉得这样可能也挺好，底层的中老年人太寂寞了，教会存在可以较少很多悲剧。
🤐你主力用的手机还装反诈中心，劝你还是尽早自首吧。
认真的说，你看外网的内容最好都要有个很干净的系统环境，不要用国内的云服务 包括apple的，梯子要可靠