Looks like nostr:nprofile1qqsqyredyxhqn0e4ln0mvh0v79rchpr0taeg4vcvt64te4kssx5pc0spz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsaes6xv is coming around. Are you ready to be on the wrong side of history, nostr:nprofile1qqs0w2xeumnsfq6cuuynpaw2vjcfwacdnzwvmp59flnp3mdfez3czpsprpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumr0wpczuum0vd5kzmp0ksxxx2?
They bend the knee to Bitcoin or fade to irrelevance
From what I could see, CTV in its current form opens up huge attack vectors for spam.
So good being de-googled.
They want to speed up CTV IMPLEMENTATION for their 2nd layer grifts and spam beneficiaries.
Cashu is about as useful as a chocolate fireguard.
The cope of Calle is off the charts. First its filters don't make any difference and now he wants to build 2nd layer solutions. The care about Bitcoin but can do what he wants. Didn't he say They can run Knots? Yes we will. GFY! https://video.nostr.build/3c14ceeff2cefb8a150138f56545bbeeb6df7b2f0333086a51caef08a888a33d.mp4
Wen Rugby stream?
Bitcoin is the real deal. All these other tokens are value extraction scams.
Half life of Million Years
He finally saw some sense as he was fighting against filters
Peak? Already?
Adam Back (nostr:nprofile1qqsqyredyxhqn0e4ln0mvh0v79rchpr0taeg4vcvt64te4kssx5pc0spz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wcq3gamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7cx8zt5) has now joined the anti-spam side of the node war.





So Bitcoin Core Devs are stewards of the chain again... Well fuck me, they've spent the last months telling plebs to go fuck themselves and they aren't.
Twitter "experts" are panicking over falling bond yields like it’s the end of the economy.
Spoiler: it’s not.
Here’s how yields actually work.
Had to post this video on twitter because men in suits are perpetuating the notion that people are dumping treasuries.
I think we are all too plugged in.
https://blossom.primal.net/bf3f4aab34008a0988166e6b39123edca7c4e9ffde6175be4bedb521559a13ae.mp4
Well explained. The question is if they have to issue new bonds at higher rates and that's not so clear on social media. If the coupon stays the same, there hasn't been a price change.
Is the moon reflecting the earth is the more interesting question.
How long is the radioactive life of the A Bomb?
I was at ground 0 and nothing.
He needs at least a 2 hour podcast. Show him the way Ben.
Does buoyancy always show the direction of a force? Yes/No
I'm sure your local lodge would know. So Mote Be.
https://video.nostr.build/56199880533d2d79a54b3edca2d9cdf2dfb7cfde61d2e662e08c730a18572433.mp4
It was fun discussion Mar but You can't not agree or disagree. Either you agree with reality or you deny it.
Ive not been discussing the shape of the earth. We dont know it?
We just know that it is moving upwards. I showed you experiments with buoyancy up /down / left / right ALWAYS goes the direction of the force.
Do you agree buoyancy goes in the direction of a force?
So is the force upwards?
I am talking about reality here, not theories.
Experiments ARE literally physical proof. We are checking the "science" behind the claims! LOL They are called FUNDAMENTAL truths because the laws of physics apply everywhere.
I know someone hasnt been to space because it defies PHYSICS! LOL
Air pressure requires a container/physical barrier, so we are in a contained system, there is no going outside!!
Rockets require combustion/air - that doesnt work in a vacuum! Etc etc
PHYSICS shows us that. Check for yourself.. Don't take my word for it.
I haven't adopted a new model. No one has been outside the reference frame, we dont know what the earth looks like.
The experiments are important because physics tells us how things work. How else do you know the truth?
What experiments have you done to verify?
The earth clearly isnt flat or a globe but level (as in orientation).
You made a claim, I was just asking why you believe that?
I know the theories and know Eric Dubay gives the same answer. He also can't provide proof of objects falling/acceleration to back up the earth being stationary.
Density and buoyancy are EFFECTS of a force (which you have half conceded)
I haven't provided evidence? What is an experiment? I have many more too. 




