Avatar
𝕞ptf
1408bad049bab8a38b976075affe413c3521bbeef62cc4ce3555299f4971f2ca
A Bitcoin hodler playing with FIRE

the stupidest thing about #coretard arguments about allowing OP_RETURN to be bigger (as much as to 100kb) on the basis that it costs more is absurd, because spammers specifically want to pay as little as possible for their pollution.

it is irrelevant to the discussion of how to counter bloat of the blocks, because the cheapest way to spam the chain is by using SEGWIT and the TAPROOT implementation bug that removes the datacarrier limit.

how about stop defending your bad takes, and actually apply your pea brains to the question in hand: how to fix what went wrong when taproot unlocked the size limit on witness?

because that's the hole that is most glaring. instead they are talking about opening up OP_RETURN which by no reasonable logic will have any impact on the material problem that exists.

i thought that taproot would be good, enabling malleability-free signatures, more compact multisig and actually the whole thing was cocked up and was how this whole shit with ordinals on the chain started when someone figured out there was a vulnerability.

almost 2 years later and there's still no resolution for that, but instead we are hearing about how we should change the non-consensus mempool filter to allow more arbitrary data in another place in the code.

like, what the fuck, guys, you aren't doing your job. if the intention was to enable smart contract shit, then sure, but this just lets noise onto the chain, and potentially ugly noise.

fix the datacarrier limit problem, and fuck off with your psychological warfare against people who don't want to relay or store spam on their nodes.

the whole reason why so many people have started running knots is because there is a glaring hole in bitcoin's security against spam and there has been PLENTY of time to do something about it, instead of opening the path to even more irrelevant data, both OP_RETURN and BitVM bullcrap.

it's hard to not wonder whether the core team has got people playing with their minds and nudging them towards turning bitcoin into a tire fire of garbage.

We dont hate core enough

Walkers employer has called him to tow the line. LOL. He looks so weak.

Replying to Avatar cryptowolf

https://www.rt.com/news/624425-russian-drones-polish-airspace/

‘Russian’ drones in Polish airspace: what we know so far

Moscow has rejected Warsaw’s accusation that it committed an “act of aggression” against the NATO state

The Russian military has suggested consultations with its Polish counterparts, after being accused by Warsaw of violating the country’s airspace with drones. The Defense Ministry in Moscow neither confirmed nor denied such violations, but implied that whatever aircraft crossed the border were not launched from Russia.

Multiple Western officials have already accused Moscow of staging a reckless provocation and hailed NATO’s joint response.

Russia and Ukraine have been conducting long-range drone and missile strikes against each other’s territory.

1) What the Russian MOD says

The Russian ministry’s statement stressed that during its overnight operations, “no targets were planned for strikes in the Polish territory,” according to a statement.

“The maximum range of Russian drones that allegedly crossed the Polish border is less than 700km. Nevertheless, we are ready to conduct consultations on the issue with the Polish Defense Ministry.”

The military said Russian forces successfully hit multiple arms production facilities in Western Ukraine.

2) What Poland claims

The Polish Defense Ministry accused Russia of staging an “act of aggression” by flying its drones into Polish airspace, some of which it said were successfully intercepted, calling the situation “unprecedented.”

Prime Minister Donald Tusk told lawmakers at least 19 separate violations took place over seven hours, with up to four aircraft downed by Polish forces. He said the incident stood out due to the number of drones and their arrival from Belarusian rather than Ukrainian airspace.

Tusk noted that the incursion posed no threat to Polish airports, some of which were shut down as the military was responding.

Warsaw has asked for formal consultations with other NATO states under Article 4 of the bloc’s founding treaty.

Poland has yet to provide evidence to support the drones’ identification as Russian, though some local media have published purported images of debris from one of them.

3) EU declares solidarity

Multiple Western officials expressed support for Poland and accused Moscow of provocative behavior.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen denounced what she described as a “reckless and unprecedented violation” of Polish airspace and declared the “full solidarity” of the EU, as she was delivering her annual ‘state of the union’ address before the European Parliament.

Kaja Kallas, the EU’s top diplomat, alleged that “indications suggest [the incident] was intentional, not accidental.”

French President Emmanuel Macron denounced the incursion as “simply unacceptable” and urged Russia “to put an end to this reckless escalation.” British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Moscow conducted an “egregious and unprecedented violation” of Polish airspace.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, a critic of the Western approach to the Ukraine conflict, has likewise expressed solidarity with Poland. However, he declined to blame Russia and argued that the incident “proves that our policy of calling for peace in the Russia-Ukraine war is reasonable and rational.”

4) What NATO says

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte echoed others’ remarks and praised the bloc’s response, which he said included Polish F-16 fighter jets, Dutch F-35s, Italian AWACS airborne radar surveillance, European air refueling tankers, and German-operated long-range Patriot missile systems.

“Whether it was intentionally or not, it is absolutely reckless. It is absolutely dangerous,” he said.

Poland claims it shot down ‘Russian drones’READ MORE: Poland claims it shot down ‘Russian drones’

5) What the Kremlin says

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov declined to respond to questions over the details, saying it was up to the military to do so.

He dismissed the Western allegations, saying “the leadership of the EU and NATO accuse Russia of provocations on a daily basis, most often declining to offer any arguments.”

6) What Belarus says

Minsk claimed credit for giving the Polish military an early warning about incoming drones.

General Pavel Muraveiko, the chief of the general staff of Belarus, reported tracking Russian and Ukrainian drones used for mutual strikes overnight, adding that some of them “had lost their track as a result of the impact of the parties’ electronic warfare assets.”

The Belarusian warning “allowed the Polish side to respond promptly” to the threat, the general noted, adding that “the Polish side also informed the Belarusian forces on duty about the approach of unidentified aircraft from the territory of Ukraine.”

Belarusian air defenses shot down some of the stray aircraft, the general said.

7) Ukrainian ‘dream’ of dragging NATO into the conflict

In an interview last week, former Polish President Andrzej Duda mentioned a November 2022 affair in which a Ukrainian interceptor missile landed on Polish territory, killing a local resident.

Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky claimed at the time the weapon was Russian and that Moscow had intentionally attacked Poland. Zelensky urged Warsaw to call on NATO’s collective defense arrangement.

“From the very beginning, they’ve been trying to drag everyone into the war. That’s obvious,” Duda said, describing such development as a “dream” for the Ukrainian leadership.

“Poland, being a NATO state, could never have agreed to that,” he added.

Was it a DJI mini or mavic?

Gg Sir. We can tell this is a bull market 😆😅

So they aren't AI that is replacing real jobs?

It is true. Core are attacking Bitcoin. The first attsck renamed the datacarrier so they coule leave the attack vector open.

Was it acted? The mainstream doesnt usually spread this material.

I concede that you could say it is compliance. I would just say, that as you know the system is coercive and still decide to participate, it is more informed consent, although you participate under duress, you could say its not true consent.

Replying to Avatar S!ayer

Knowledge upload complete.

You can, but there are consequences to it. If you dont do something, like pay taxes voluntarily, people with guns will come to your house. Its up to you if you want to face that, you have a choice.