Avatar
100satsaday
242e066aaf1940fb71a8eeee262c0e73985f2c17c697ad0783dba1f42c68d231
| ₿itcoin full node runner. | ₿eliever of decentralization. | All notes are my own opinions, not financial advice, not AI generated.

Who knows. Not needed by someone can’t not be the reason. You are basically speaking for others, this is not the way.

Yeah that privilege. Same logic can apply to bitcoin. It is not needed by fiat elites = shitcoin. It is not needed by gold bugs = shitcoin. I am a bitcoiner because I have logical reasons not privilege.

It is clearly not needed by you nor by me. Is this enough to deem it shitcoin? This logic doesn’t make sense.

What if they just sent empty sub down there and intentionally let it implode. I am sure there are people in the world who want to be “dead” on file.🤔

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/sub-tragedy-oceangate-still-advertising-trips-to-titanic-shipwreck-4164791/amp/1

Climate change is a fact, human activity driven is a hypothesis. Know the difference.

I don’t know, looks like it doesn’t have CEO, foundation, premine though. What makes it shitcoin?

I like Monero people here, Nostr is not bitcoin only.

“All US spent nuclear fuel til date can fit in a football field 10 yards deep.”

It sounds not big, but considering the first nuclear plant went on line in 1960s and nuclear went up gradually to 19.5% of total US generation mix today, is it still small? I don’t think we can afford to go fully nuclear if that means 1000x or 10000x waste generation rate. There is still a long way to go before humanity explores galaxy, we can’t simply “go for it” without proper planning and estimating.

Everything comes with pros and cons. Current technology has totally no deal to treat spent nuclear fuel other than storage. So the question comes to how to deal with storage and for how long. The radiation has decay time periods, will demand never catch up with storage space replenishment? Or will the storage space never runout even with exploding increase of demand? Or are we just hoping new technology somehow solve this? Questions deserve answers.

/800px-U.S._2014_Electricity_Generation_By_Type.png

The thing itself is pointless, they are just showing they have the high precision machining capability. Having that is a great advantage of … doing useful things when needed.

Micro Strategy could be a perfect black sawn. Just saying.

What’s funny about people being wrong? I am wrong all the time especially when it comes to some argument, wondering who is always right all the time.

Oh one more thing I forgot even to mention: the cost of insurance for high rise. Just imagine the cost of repairs when a top floor flooded. All lower floors are ruined. This is not a bias this is physics. Low rise condos are the ONLY solution. I am in the industry and I know what money is involved for such things. 🤙

High rise condos are never meant to solve housing affordability. The cost of service skyrockets as the height of building increases. Just think about the cost and maintenance of multiple elevators, , swimming pools, fire suppression systems, staged water booster pumps, central chillers and boilers, seismic dampers, none of these will make your living box affordable. The more skyscrapers a city has the worse the housing affordability will be. Low rise condos are the real solutions.

I don’t believe legacy systems is joining it before fighting it. Swan has to be black.