Security is always going to be inversely proportional to convenience. The need for security is proportional to social trust. In low stakes, high trust environments, low friction solutions will flourish. In high stakes, low trust environments, self-custody will be the default.

I say this all the time. But I think one of the problems is a lot of bitcoiners are in a low trust, high stakes mindset at all times, and believe everyone else should be to. This leads to a bit of confusion to how things are going to play out, in aggregate.

These only delay the inevitable IMO. The incentives are just too strong to make people adopt the network over time. Its either global North Korea or bitcoin.

Whoops I meant #[4]

I got gender affirmative surgery preview by Midjourney and I think that’s enough internet for today

so 100bps rate cut on Sunday?

Cramer, who said three days ago that FRC is a "very good bank" says sell your bitcoin.

How do you get content creators outside of the realm of bitcoin to adopt nostr as a monetization & media platform when their following is also not currently capable of paying in bitcoin.

You need to convince people to run two parallel systems and bitcoiners need to help support their other favorite content creators outside of bitcoin. Once the content creators see the light, they will be incentivized to convince their following to move.

Feels like another chicken and the egg problem.

Reminder, many people don’t understand how robust the network actually is:

#[0]

Good morning, #nostr wizards

Test

Since we're all talking about it, I'm kind of surprised too. Ordinals seem to have died as fast as they came. 😂

Interesting..

How should the app deal with too many likes?

Crop them? Break them out? Just show "important" ones? Pictures partially overlapping each other?

#[0]

Make separate zaps in/zaps out wallet to see how many zaps you send and accumulate.

I just watched Cocaine Bear AMA