Avatar
BITKARROT
3878d95db7b854c3a0d3b2d6b7bf9bf28b36162be64326f5521ba71cf3b45a69
I wear many hats. https://nostree.me/bitkarrot@nostr.com

An Alternative to the way Zaps are implemented discussed here, aptly named

LNURL Over NOSTR

Kukks says "This is a very early draft of something I've been thinking of for a long time that allows LN wallets that are not on servers to offer LNURL endpoints."

Benarc says "Saves having to run server and doxing youself"

https://github.com/lnurl/luds/pull/203

I kinda dig it

What do you think?

#[0]​

Can you point people smarter than me to https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/223 ?

I’m curious who else might be working on this or thinking about it.

It looks like the smartest people are already replying to your thread on the Nostr NIP-69 thread.

Gogo Git-str. (oh god that sounds like friendster :p )

haaaa can't wait for the podcast to be out, the sooner the better really. 😁

More people should follow #[7]

because he has some wicked stuff going on at nostr.band

One day I hope to be able to search for that really good breakfast spice vendor in the street markets of Istanbul who supplies Michael Mina in San Francisco

I believe Nostr has the power to change local markets, globally, forever.

Never thought I'd say this but on BlogStack the transition from twitter style Nostr social media to a lightning enabled Substack is LITERALLY SEAMLESS.

All your Relays, All your follows, All your Content, with no effort. #[0]

Kudos to whomever kickstarted this

https://blogstack.io/

Original video from twitter via fiatjaf #[1]

https://twitter.com/fiatjaf/status/1629917966224564224?s=20

I'm pretty sure my Zaps are working, but if still its problematic do let me know!

Replying to Avatar ODELL

A Cypherpunk's Manifesto

Eric Hughes

March 9, 1993

---------------------

Privacy is necessary for an open society in the electronic age. Privacy is not secrecy. A private matter is something one doesn't want the whole world to know, but a secret matter is something one doesn't want anybody to know. Privacy is the power to selectively reveal oneself to the world.

If two parties have some sort of dealings, then each has a memory of their interaction. Each party can speak about their own memory of this; how could anyone prevent it? One could pass laws against it, but the freedom of speech, even more than privacy, is fundamental to an open society; we seek not to restrict any speech at all. If many parties speak together in the same forum, each can speak to all the others and aggregate together knowledge about individuals and other parties. The power of electronic communications has enabled such group speech, and it will not go away merely because we might want it to.

Since we desire privacy, we must ensure that each party to a transaction have knowledge only of that which is directly necessary for that transaction. Since any information can be spoken of, we must ensure that we reveal as little as possible. In most cases personal identity is not salient. When I purchase a magazine at a store and hand cash to the clerk, there is no need to know who I am. When I ask my electronic mail provider to send and receive messages, my provider need not know to whom I am speaking or what I am saying or what others are saying to me; my provider only need know how to get the message there and how much I owe them in fees. When my identity is revealed by the underlying mechanism of the transaction, I have no privacy. I cannot here selectively reveal myself; I must always reveal myself.

Therefore, privacy in an open society requires anonymous transaction systems. Until now, cash has been the primary such system. An anonymous transaction system is not a secret transaction system. An anonymous system empowers individuals to reveal their identity when desired and only when desired; this is the essence of privacy.

Privacy in an open society also requires cryptography. If I say something, I want it heard only by those for whom I intend it. If the content of my speech is available to the world, I have no privacy. To encrypt is to indicate the desire for privacy, and to encrypt with weak cryptography is to indicate not too much desire for privacy. Furthermore, to reveal one's identity with assurance when the default is anonymity requires the cryptographic signature.

We cannot expect governments, corporations, or other large, faceless organizations to grant us privacy out of their beneficence. It is to their advantage to speak of us, and we should expect that they will speak. To try to prevent their speech is to fight against the realities of information. Information does not just want to be free, it longs to be free. Information expands to fill the available storage space. Information is Rumor's younger, stronger cousin; Information is fleeter of foot, has more eyes, knows more, and understands less than Rumor.

We must defend our own privacy if we expect to have any. We must come together and create systems which allow anonymous transactions to take place. People have been defending their own privacy for centuries with whispers, darkness, envelopes, closed doors, secret handshakes, and couriers. The technologies of the past did not allow for strong privacy, but electronic technologies do.

We the Cypherpunks are dedicated to building anonymous systems. We are defending our privacy with cryptography, with anonymous mail forwarding systems, with digital signatures, and with electronic money.

Cypherpunks write code. We know that someone has to write software to defend privacy, and since we can't get privacy unless we all do, we're going to write it. We publish our code so that our fellow Cypherpunks may practice and play with it. Our code is free for all to use, worldwide. We don't much care if you don't approve of the software we write. We know that software can't be destroyed and that a widely dispersed system can't be shut down.

Cypherpunks deplore regulations on cryptography, for encryption is fundamentally a private act. The act of encryption, in fact, removes information from the public realm. Even laws against cryptography reach only so far as a nation's border and the arm of its violence. Cryptography will ineluctably spread over the whole globe, and with it the anonymous transactions systems that it makes possible.

For privacy to be widespread it must be part of a social contract. People must come and together deploy these systems for the common good. Privacy only extends so far as the cooperation of one's fellows in society. We the Cypherpunks seek your questions and your concerns and hope we may engage you so that we do not deceive ourselves. We will not, however, be moved out of our course because some may disagree with our goals.

The Cypherpunks are actively engaged in making the networks safer for privacy. Let us proceed together apace.

Onward.

To know the Future, you must study the Past.

1993-1996 was a critical era that plebs should not over look when it comes to Cypherpunk principles on the internets #[0]

Just kidding. Its because my lightning address currently does not support Zaps. I know, I know. Working on it. Anyway regular lightning address sends should work fine, last checked.

does this mean i should switch to WoS instead of finishing integration in LNBits? 😂

I do not have zaps enabled, but you should be able to send to my lightning address, is that also failing? me@lnaddy.com - please do let me know so i can fix it

its good but too many people using WoS starts to create a centralized choke point; more people need to run their own LN Nodes and/or use other wallets.

if custodial, I try to direct people at other options, like getAlby or Ln.tips bot

Common Knowledge that the' Vaccine is the Clot shot' is near.

https://youtu.be/AD8IeJEOmcA

Yeah I have a huge issue this with, as well.

There are WAY too many people using custodial lightning on nostr

Nostr makes Twitter obsolete.

Spotted on #twitter

@npub1sqaxzwvh5fhgw9q3d7v658ucapvfeds3dcd2587fcwyesn7dnwuqt2r45v

#BLOCKELON is trending on twitter.

With the mess, its possible twitter might shutdown by the end of the year.

Nostriches would have already migrated their friends and families :D

Editing might be good, too many goof ball posts from hitting the send key too early

hm interesting i guess for Zap enabled clients the LN Address provides the data from the lnaddress server that is then used to populate NIP57 zaps. So, Zaps are not the same as sending sats via LNAddress, although that's the only thing that is required to make the Zap work in Zap enabled clients