Love cotton and prefer it but a big challenge I’ve had with it is that if it’s pure, it shrinks so much.
Hard to trust sizing remains consistent post wash.
He just dropped a 🔥 one out of nowhere & no one told me?
https://open.spotify.com/track/7aRCf5cLOFN1U7kvtChY1G?si=3xkFW99UTv6lEPNRie17hA&dd=1
#[0] I’d buy a #nostr hoodie.
Not too loud(understated design), just so nostriches can strike up a convo in public
#[0] welcome to nostr 🤙
What’s your daily goal? I’ve been trying to hit 10k (love the city so that helps!)
💯
I forget where I read about this philosophy about 3 years ago and I’ve been trying to imbibe this in my way of life ever since.
Makes it harder to hate as you said but also makes it easy to discover & pick up the good even from people you thought you’d dislike(you’d be surprised)!
Since 6 years, it’s great.
When the everyday small business has the ability to offer the freedom of choice 🙂
Oh lol tag just resolved to human readable name after I posted this, sorry didn’t realize this was meant to be just a gpt test 😬
Referential transparency and higher trust ability when reading code(imo).
I think pure functional is a stricter but “purer”(no pun intended) way to reason about code anyway vs impure functional/purely imperative styles.
You can absolutely use these benefits in some other languages, at least from my (somewhat limited) experience. Racket (scheme) is one example, but another, perhaps more popular being Scala. (monads)
I’ve yet to dive deeper into Haskell tbh but you raised an interesting observation & who knows I might finally get into it haha
Well put Jack and #[3] very rounded, non-maximalist & relatively objective comparisons in your post. 👍
A small gift from Dall-E:
Plebstr UX ++
nostr
Prolly 82 BTC worth of cumulative zaps (still impressive)
Although, what’s the difference b/w users & pubkeys?
Snort or damus for each platform? And I haven’t used it on android so no idea there