Avatar
Gareth Kitchen
4ccb4096d76c3a22767d68bd680ddccfde4943f7c6136f5e8f6deb5f2bb871da

My youngest, with friends, somehow managed to get a bootleg copy of the Minecraft movie running within Minecraft. I'm glad that I've raisedhim well. :)

So, yet again my small high street cookshop in a rural English town has paid more tax than Starbucks entire UK operation.

Cynically, Starbucks is more than profitable enough to pay £40m of royalties to its US parent company, thereby incuring a loss of £35m.

Global revenue for 2024 was $36billion.

'Good chance' of US-UK trade deal, says JD Vance

What chance does the UK have of ensuring that the US meets its obligations when neither Mexico or Canada could?

#uspol

Article I of the constitution provides that Congress is “to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations”

Somebody's dropped the ball.

Replying to Avatar GrapheneOS

Secure PDF Viewer app version 27 released:

https://github.com/GrapheneOS/PdfViewer/releases/tag/27

See the linked release notes for a summary of the improvements over the previous release and a link to the full changelog.

Forum discussion thread:

https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/21634-secure-pdf-viewer-app-version-27-released

#GrapheneOS #privacy #security #pdf #android

Just one feature request for the entire OS; allow swiping to turn pages in this app rather than those tiny buttons!

Replying to Avatar Kevin's Bacon

## My argument against communism / collectivism and the collective ownership myth.

The attractiveness of the ideas of collectivism rests largely upon the logical fallacy of confusing the logical quantifiers of some vs all, whatever the name of that fallacy is (someone please help me because I'm too lazy to look it up lol). Send this argument to anyone who is open minded, able to comprehend logic, and needs to understand why collectivism is evil, or who is looking for good rebuttals to collectivist dogma. Works against fascists and national socialists too.

Ownership means total subjugation and control of a resource. Your property is that which you can control entirely and exclusively. You can include others, but you are able to exclude them. You are also unable to exclude people of ALL of such an item that exist in the world, unless you happen to own all of them and no one else is able to get more (one example is your body: you own all of your body and no one can replicate that; you do not own all of the coconuts in existence, other people own some of them). You need to have this kind of property right over your body, which I hope is clear to even communists (and the ones that deny this will not usually openly admit that they do). You also need this for things like your food that you have purchased or received, in order to eat it and maintain your body. There are a number of reasons you need exclusive control of things. These are by definition your property.

Communism purports to make all capital (all stuff used for making stuff) the property simultaneously of you and everyone else. But this is a contradiction. Total control of a resource by you necessarily excludes at least some of the control that other people can have over it. So what communism necessarily does is to confuse people about who is actually in control, as we can see by the definition of ownership and how their entire philosophy rests on a contradiction. To confuse people over who, rightfully or in actuality, owns what, is to invite feuds over the use of the resource, while the actual owner, if one exists (the one that maintains more or less exclusive control over the capital), is the only holder of this wealth. Thus communism necessarily leads to tyranny by at least one economic actor, as its ideology is the chief tool of usurpation, chiefly by those entrusted with guardianship over a resource and those positioned to benefit from a transfer of wealth and privileges. The rest of the activity in this society of "collective ownership," the actions of fighting for control of resources that are not owned by them but are nonetheless partially entitled to them via rations, handouts, state or "community" run services, etc., contributes to consumption and reduction in the capital, even in addition to the newfound misallocation of capital at the hands of the tyrant. The society destroys wealth instead of making wealth more accessible for all.

Communism, in short, maximizes the tragedy of the commons to its ultimate destructive potential, because it obscures all ownership and protection into a free-for-all grab with no guidance, information, or effective protection, to direct resource allocation or productive activities. It becomes impossible to match resources to needs, or to create or preserve the resources in the first place. Those who govern the society and call themselves "The People" get to boss around not only this capital, but the people themselves, and this corporation which calls itself "The People" effectively owns the people. This last statement is the logical conclusion of all collectivism, by definition, as well as in practice.

In fact, with all this subjugation, ownership of one's body is often explicitly relinquished as well, as it naturally follows from the twisted ideology of collectivism, the body being private property after all, and it is the tyrant or the psychopath's desire to steal or control as much of other's things as he can. Rape becomes very, very prevalent in practice in communist or socialist experiments, though you can see without ever looking at the history that it is implied that if no one has an exclusive right to control her body, then anyone may violate it at any time. The collectivist lie has been used time and again to exploit people for millenia. Communism is nonstop gang rape. Democracy is gang rape with rapists changing hands every 2 years. "The People" of the United States, as is in reality embodied by our "representatives" and "agents" and those that do dealings with them, is just an aggressive corporation engaged in this exact activity, just on a smaller scale compared to the economy it parasitizes, such as to allow space for economic growth sufficient to quell revolutions and attract more unearned tax receipts and treasury bond investments.

Read #LysanderSpooner and #MurrayRothbard for more. Think free. Peace.

Sounds great. I've paid taxes all my life. Close to retirement age. But had recent heart issues. Can no longer work. Treatment received has cost over $100k+. How should that be funded?

According to Michael Shellenberger, https://x.com/shellenberger/status/1909755511182180796, time spent on BlueSky is a significant predictor of Left Wing Authoritarianism (which justifies the murder of Trump and Elon Musk, and the destruction of Tesla automobiles)

Help me out here with your terminology. I'm from UK.

Using well known figures I guess George W Bush would be Right Wing and J.D. Vance Right Wing Authoritarian? Is this right? Help me out on the Left side. Where would, say, the Clinton's or Obahma fit? Left? Would that make Authoritarian Left , Bernie Saunders?

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqkj6xq0jl6kav0qsqt3fdt2r35mlahq7nkm7usxwarvts9cq29krqphhak5 it’s ~36h if you keep Wi-Fi+Bluetooth on, keep the brightness high and use some power-hungry/synchronization-hungry apps for hours. Otherwise, if you mostly use it to take notes and read stuff offline, it looks like it can easily last for a week.

I seriously looked at one of these but baulked and went with a Linux Thinkpad. I might have erred. :(

Metadata; Infomation used by law enforcement to surveil Facebook/WhatsApp/Insta users.

#BadDadJoke

When they come for the Quakers you know your country is really in trouble. How can the Quakers be a threat to this or any other democratic government?

https://www.quaker.org.uk/news-and-events/news/quakers-condemn-police-raid-on-westminster-meeting-house

Replying to Avatar Ava

I used to post a lot more about privacy and security, but it tends to attract a lot of paranoid people—many of which probably have mental issues, and probably shouldn't be on the internet if they actually have the threat model they think they have. Many of which seem to have a penchant for attacking other privacy tech and users of that tech for not being completely anonymous.

I still post about it, just not as much as I used to because I want to keep things in their proper perspective, and the scene can be quite toxic to interact with on the regular—especially on platforms and protocols one doesn't have the ability to moderate.

For example: Just mentioning that you use GrapheneOS (because they use Pixels) or Proton and not Mulvad, etc. is enough to get you called a spook or worse in some circles. I once got harassed daily for promoting GrapheneOS by some anon who thought everyone should use LineageOS. This went on for months.

I used GrapheneOS for years, now I am back on Google OS for Android as my daily driver. I know my threat model and I practice privacy and security through isolation and compartmentalization, but this alone has been enough for people to throw ad hominem attacks my way.

Know your threat model in the various areas of your life—both online and off, and act accordingly. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good. Don't let paranoid nyms online deter you from practicing threat model appropriate OPSEC for YOUR unique situation.

Not everyone needs to act like Edward Snowden when he was on the lam with gov secrets. Even he says he's not as hardcore as he used to be because he's in a different place in his life. Lots of privacy advocates will try to tell you that you have one threat model MOST EXTREME. That is not the correct approach, and as I said in the post, you will burn out.

A trusted no logs VPN is great for privacy (Proton/Mullvad) is great for privacy, but it will not keep you anonymous, Tor is better for anonymity. Both will be a pain with financial services. I used to keep my VPN on ALWAYS, and it was more of a pain than it was worth trying to do legitimate business online.

I mean, even some private torrent sites disallow VPN use, so they can keep users from abusing their services.

One very valid usecase for a VPN is that clearnet Nostr relays have access to your IP address, and some of them are maliciously scraping user data. If you use a VPN or something like Orbot/Tor on mobile that comes with Amethyst, then relays will not have access to your IP.

Another is that if you are using Chrome, then all of your Internet searches are tracked by Google. If you use a VPN, but you are logged into Gmail, a VPN will be of little use. If you use a VPN and are not logged in, then your activity will be more private when it comes to Google.

Just know that the VPN you use will have access to your IP and must comply with local gov law. They will hand over any data they have if the gov demands they do so. They will not risk going to jail over a $5 a month service. This is why using a no-logs VPN is so important—but you have to trust that they are actually not logging.

A quality VPN is one that reduces the amount of data they have access to, so if the powers that be force them to hand it over, they have nothing to hand over. Proton has handed over user data in the past, but that is because the user added a "backup email" to their user account. This information IS visible to Proton (so they can help restore compromised access to accounts) and therefore they will have to hand it over in the event of a gov subpoena.

The user did not follow proper OPSEC and did not follow Proton's explicit warnings about adding a backup email.

No privacy tool or service can prevent users from shooting themselves in the foot with bad OPSEC.

Definitely check out the Techlore video and the other links I posted. Bazzell's books and training are technical in nature and will give you step-by-step instructions to get things set up. Check them out when you are ready.

I recommend using a browser like LibreWolf or Brave that is not Google. They both have protections against browser fingerprinting (look this up), and Brave has a built-in site tracker blocker.

Use Tor browser where you need/want more anonymity. Use offline conversations wherever possible for the most sensitive conversations.

Bitcoin is not private, lightning is better, but it can also be traced. Monero is more anonymous.

Use a quality VPN like Proton or Mullvad when you don't want sites or relays to have access to your IP or browsing habits.

Host your own cloud to store your photos and data—a Synology NAS is a good starting point (Synology is not open source, but they are good for beginners) or use Proton Drive since it has E2EE.

Use a password manager. A cloud-based service like Proton Pass or Bitwarden is great for most people—much safer than reusing memorable passwords. For usecases where cloud-based is not trusted, use KeePass (preferably on an air-gapped device or VM).

Use a private messenger for sensitive conversations like Signal or SimpleX.

Go for services that use E2EE wherever possible (just note that all encryption is not created equal).

Be mindful of the websites you visit.

Be mindful of the mobile keyboards you use—some of them "phone home." Turning off G-Board access to the Internet is a good practice to keep it from phoning home, but it will limit functionality. You make the call based on your threat model.

Windows and Mac collect a lot of user data, look into Linux, just know that Linux is not as secure out of the box—but you can harden it. QubesOS is way more private and secure, but it is not as user-friendly. Use Tails on a USB when you need an OS that you can plug in and burn—maybe with a hidden volume to hide things with plausible deniability etc. (it's not meant for daily driving).

Look into a hardware firewall for your home network like a Protectli, both Bazzell and Brockwell (below) have guides on setting it up.

Use a private DNS service like OpenDNS or Control D, don't trust Google DNS.

Study social engineering, etc...

Again, I could go on, but I don't want to overwhelm you. Once you get the concept of OPSEC down, you will be able to make these judgement calls for yourself and your situation based on your threat model.

Another good channel for the basics is:

https://m.youtube.com/@NaomiBrockwellTV

Best wishes to you on your journey.

Wise words. :)

Replying to Avatar BrianKrebs

This seems like an ominous development:

"A new executive order from President Donald Trump aims to expand information-sharing across federal agencies as well as between federal and state governments, but civil libertarians and other experts are warning that the main purpose is to help normalize how the Department of Government Efficiency is handling government data."

"The order, issued Thursday, directs all federal agency heads to modify or rescind any regulations preventing the sharing of unclassified data and records between federal agencies."

"Agency heads also must ensure that the U.S. government has “unfettered access” to comprehensive data from all state programs that receive federal funding. The order extends to all such data even when stored in third-party databases."

"The stated goal is “eliminating bureaucratic duplication and inefficiency while enhancing the Government’s ability to detect overpayments and fraud” — the supposed core of DOGE’s mission. The order does not mention DOGE by name."

"Civil libertarians and other experts, however, call the new EO an alarming development, and say it is meant to give cover to DOGE, which has been the subject of numerous lawsuits as its workers continue to root through government records and disrupt federal agencies. Trump also has previously sought to consolidate data for reasons that would infringe on civil liberties, the experts say."

"While the new EO asserts that the removal of data “silos” is designed to eliminate fraud, waste and abuse, disturbing mission creep is very possible, said Elizabeth Laird, director of equity and civic technology at the nonprofit Center for Democracy and Technology."

"There are no assurances that the data won’t be used for “targeting people who the administration has separately said are a priority for them,” Laird said. “That can include immigrants, it can include people who are transgender, it can include people that speak up” against the administration. "

More here:

https://therecord.media/trump-executive-order-information-silos-data-sharing-doge

The last time I recall an Executive Order as sweeping as this was after 9/11 where Bush permitted the wide sharing of privileged and sensitive data. That culminated in the Iraq, diplomat, Manning, Wikileak débâcle a decade later. Whatever your view on that doesn't much matter, but the unexpected consequences of poorly thought out Executive Orders are demonstratably profound.

I have often stated that the bullet on that campaign day should have hit Trump’s head rather than shave his ear.

I firmly stand by it.

I firmly believe that Donald J. Trump deserves to die, and in a very painful and public way in order to discourage any future wannabe dictator - just like the violent deaths of Mussolini and Hitler have discouraged dictators in Western Europe for nearly a century.

I firmly believe that there’ll be no way of getting rid of Trump through democratic means, even if he loses the next election, and that the 6th of January was just a small anticipation of the civil war that will come.

I firmly believe that, if given the choice between the death of thousands or millions in a civil war, or in a military invasion of Canada/Greenland/Panama, or the destruction of other economies (and their own domestic economy) through reckless tariffs, and the death of a single human being, we should choose the death of that single human being without even thinking twice.

I firmly believe that the principles of liberal democracy don’t apply to those who despise them and leverage them just to get into power, that Popper’s paradox of tolerance is valid today more than ever, and that violence is the only language you can speak to those who only understand violence.

I firmly believe that a bully who is used to get his way through threats and extorsion isn’t fit to be a leader, even if he manages to convince half of the population of the contrary.

I firmly believe that being bossy with your moderate allies and being weak with authoritarian bullies is an act of weakness, not of strength.

I invite my fellow American friends to take on the arms now, before Trump’s authoritarian metamorphosis is complete, before America becomes a one-man show with institutions filled up with yes-men, before the damage done to its reputation becomes impossible to fix, and before it permanently loses all of the friends it has made over the course of a century.

Democracy is much more fragile than we, spoiled by 80 years of peace, may think.

Just fyi threatening the president of the United States is a federal felony under US law. It's one of the few limits on free speech in the US. I hope that you are not intending to travel there any time soon. ;)

Replying to Avatar GrapheneOS

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqug52sq4g3ppt5gdr7q2fwyghqjufy4lgqrz5gx6v762e8y86d8tqgue4fg It's not a native terminal app with specific commands but rather is a virtual machine management app for running other operating systems. If you want a native terminal app, there are various options available.

I know it's completely different but a over a decade ago we had Busybox on CyanogenMod. Every release tightened the permissions just a little bit more.... :)