Profile: 4fc4eac7...

But should you? It seems like you are the guy posting relentlessly about current UK politics ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ˜ƒ

It seems like you know very little about data transmission networks and their history. Might make sense to research outside of the conspiracy influencer bubbles.

I sure would be entertained by the debate between you two after his recent proclamations

Shitcoiners on X in disbelief that people use lightning for payments.

"It CaNt WoRK BeCaUsE mY bAgS aRe HeAvY"

A hardened male bitcoiner can learn from females to withhold conversation about bitcoin (sex on the females side) until at least the third date. Dont spill the beans to early

Can you explain what the average swap time means? I would interpret this as the average transaction takes 5 seconds to complete which seems quite high? Or is there a far lower mean and some exceptions on the long end?

Replying to Avatar Bulli0n

President Woodrow Wilson signed into law the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.

Before it reached his desk, many congressmen were coerced into believing it to be a โ€˜federal entityโ€™ given its name.

However, there is nothing โ€œfederalโ€ about the #FederalReserve. It is owned by 12 member banks spread across the US, who have โ€œsharesโ€ in it. The only part of the federal reserve that is controlled by Uncle Sam is when the president appoints its Chairman. As far as its actions & monetary policy, the Fed is not accountable to any branch of the federal government.

๐Ÿ…ต๐Ÿ†„๐Ÿ…ฝ ๐Ÿ…ต๐Ÿ…ฐ๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ†ƒ: ๐ƒ๐ข๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐ค๐ง๐จ๐ฐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐…๐ž๐๐ž๐ซ๐š๐ฅ ๐‘๐ž๐ฌ๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ž ๐๐จ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ก๐š๐ฏ๐ž ๐š๐ง ๐ข๐ง๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ ๐ ๐ž๐ง๐ž๐ซ๐š๐ฅ ๐š๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ง๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ž๐ž ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐›๐ž๐ก๐š๐ฏ๐ข๐จ๐ซ ๐จ๐ง ๐›๐ž๐ก๐š๐ฅ๐Ÿ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ž๐ฑ๐ž๐œ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐›๐ซ๐š๐ง๐œ๐ก?

Instead they have their own, but is not accountable to the OIG. Even the CIA, the greatest & most clandestine intelligence agency in the world, has an inspector general assigned & appointed by the president. Americans are more likely to understand what goes on in the CIA than the Federal Reserve, because the Fed isnโ€™t accountable to anyone.

The constitution clearly states under Article I, Section 8, Clause 5:

[๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐ก๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ก๐š๐ฏ๐ž ๐๐จ๐ฐ๐ž๐ซ . . . ] ๐“๐จ ๐œ๐จ๐ข๐ง ๐Œ๐จ๐ง๐ž๐ฒ, ๐ซ๐ž๐ ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐š๐ญ๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐•๐š๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐จ๐Ÿ, ๐š๐ง๐ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ž๐ข๐ ๐ง ๐‚๐จ๐ข๐ง, ๐š๐ง๐ ๐Ÿ๐ข๐ฑ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐’๐ญ๐š๐ง๐๐š๐ซ๐ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐–๐ž๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ๐ฌ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐Œ๐ž๐š๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ; . . .

With that being said, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 conflicts with the US Constitution. Only Uncle Sam, per the constitution & fully accountable to the American people, should be the ones responsible for the issuance & management of currency & the monetary system of the nation as a whole. It should not be handled by small elite factions behind closed doors (private banks), who are not accountable to anyone but themselves.

Even the founding fathers, such as Thomas Jefferson, warned of the dangers of the idea of a central bank (I.e. the Fed)

Benjamin Franklin mentioned the colonies inability to get power to issue their own money out of the hands of George III & international bankers was the ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ฆ๐ž ๐ซ๐ž๐š๐ฌ๐จ๐ง for the Revolutionary War. (Full quote below in the attached images)

#JFK issued a United States Note (executive order 11110) that was to be backed in full by gold, debt free & to be issued by the Treasury, not the Fed.

After his assassination, all notes were removed from circulation๐Ÿค”๐Ÿง. All that was left was the coins (issued by the US mint), which make up less than 1/1000th of the overall currency in circulation & the Federal Reserve Notes (make up the majority of currency)

#introductions

Only Uncle Sam, per the constitution & fully accountable to the American people, should be the ones responsible for the issuance & management of currency.

This is your argument against the fed? ๐Ÿคฃ

Lets hope Washington takes over and issues a great currency for us to use ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™

Climate change ๐Ÿ˜ตโ€๐Ÿ’ซ

So if one roughly subscribes to libertarian ideas, are they venn diagrammed by either economically successful (no need for the state) or some redneck with a shotgun (disdain for the state) or both?

Replying to Avatar Max

# BOOK LAUNCH!

# The Praxeology of Privacy

v0.1.0 Now Available

I'm excited to announce the publication of **"The Praxeology of Privacy: Economic Logic in Cypherpunk Implementation"** - a complete manuscript bridging Austrian economics with cypherpunk cryptography.

## What Is This Book?

This work proves that **privacy isn't just a preferenceโ€”it's an economic necessity**. Through rigorous praxeological analysis, it demonstrates that privacy is logically required for rational economic action, property rights, and voluntary exchange.

### The Core Argument

I develop a **Three-Axiom Framework** showing how:

- **Privacy enables economic calculation** (building on Mises)

- **Privacy protects rational discourse** (extending Hoppe)

- **Privacy provides resistance tools** (following Voskuil)

The result? A systematic proof that surveillance systems create the same calculation problems as socialist planning, while cryptographic tools restore the conditions necessary for free markets.

## Why This Matters

For too long, privacy advocates have relied on moral arguments while economists have ignored cryptographic innovation. This book bridges that gap, showing that:

- **Cypherpunks** gain rigorous economic foundations for their tools

- **Austrian economists** discover how cryptography solves fundamental problems

- **Everyone** learns why privacy is essential for human flourishing

## What's Inside

~70,000 words across 21 chapters covering:

- Economic logic of digital signatures and zero-knowledge proofs

- How surveillance destroys market discovery processes

- Cryptographic property rights and enforcement mechanisms

- Practical framework for building parallel economies

- Original theoretical contributions to both traditions

## Download Now

**Complete manuscript available in multiple formats:**

- Light/Dark PDFs for reading

- Summary collection for overview

- Text-to-speech optimized version

- Individual chapters + full archive

๐Ÿ‘‰ **Download here:** towardsliberty.com/pop

## The Best Part

This work is **100% public domain**. Copy it, share it, sell it, modify itโ€”whatever helps spread these ideas.

## Next Steps

- **Researchers**: I welcome feedback, critique, and collaboration

- **Educators**: Use this material in courses and discussions

- **Practitioners**: Apply the framework to evaluate privacy technologies

- **Publishers**: Contact me about formal publication opportunities

I would love to get some serious review before we print the first batch, so please reach out with critique and improvement proposals.

This represents a couple years of research connecting two intellectual traditions that desperately needed each other. I believe it's the first systematic praxeological analysis of cryptographyโ€”and hopefully not the last.

**What do you think? Does this framework resonate with your understanding of privacy and economics? Do I make any logical flaws?**

Kinda ironic, but the link does not work when I have a vpn (Proton) active

Replying to Avatar Micael

In the 1920s a man called Edward Bernays (Sigmund Freud's nephew) revolutionized public relations and advertising by applying Freud's theories of the unconscious mind to mass persuasion.

Bernays realized that if you could play to people's unconscious insecuritiesโ€”feelings of lack, desire, unworthiness, etc.โ€”you could sell them anything. Rather than just fulfilling existing needs, Bernays taught companies how to manufacture new desiresโ€”a form of mass manipulation.

Emphasis on lack became the fundamental principle of advertisingโ€”to subconsciously manipulate you into thinking you need something the advertiser is selling.

For example, he held a campaign for the American Tobacco Company where women smoked in a public parade, branding cigarettes as "torches of freedom" and linking smoking to female empowerment.

Advertising has never been the same since its goal is to manipulate you into spending your money by subliminally preying on your deeper emotional needsโ€”sex, status, freedom, or security. This is how the default mindset of the masses fuels a dangerously excessive consumerism.

In contrast, one of the fundamental principles of virtually all the world's spiritual traditions is that you do not need anything from outside of yourself to become spiritually fulfilled.

Realize this deeply: you have everything you need; you are a manifestation of the divine. Donโ€™t allow yourself to be manipulated into unnecessary consumption to the greater benefit of large corporations and detriment to yourself and the environment.

Society makes you believe you need something you do not already have in order to be happy.

Spoiler: everything you need is already within you.

Tell this nostr:nprofile1qqsp4lsvwn3aw7zwh2f6tcl6249xa6cpj2x3yuu6azaysvncdqywxmgpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqzenhwden5te0ve5kcar9wghxummnw3ezuamfdejj7mnsw43rzun5d3ckxcfcwgmxzatev9mn2m34dqekcdf5xgexgmf5wde8jdty0fnx2ef5xcunven3v5u8xdn3va6kg6mnxajx5arxwvlkyun0v9jxxctnws7hgun4v5dpfm4n he thinks everyone should have kids to cope with existence

Im looking for knowledge to counter the "I have nothing to hide" sentiment regarding online privacy. Are there any good books/videos out there? nostr:nprofile1qqsxu35yyt0mwjjh8pcz4zprhxegz69t4wr9t74vk6zne58wzh0waycpz3mhxw309ucnydewxqhrqt338g6rsd3e9uq5gamn8ghj77tvwpc8g6fhv3uxkcm3w4nx2drtxfmngurrxfmrxdmhwe3hsumkv5mk5mmv0fhxjut3vdj8j6tkw9c8zmr9xdkxjepwdahxjmmw9uhazftv maybe?

#asknostr