It is as long as you only post shit Elon agrees with.
Look into Rizful.com as well. They're a cloud Lightning node provider, similar to Alby but more hands on. Whereas Alby does all the work for you, on Rizful you handle opening and closing your own channels. Rizful also provides a lightning address for receiving zaps, and has full NWC support which facilitates sending zaps from within your client, and connecting to the Alby Go wallet for easy sending and receiving. I use them and I've been really happy with it.
If you're on Android, I highly recommend Minibits Wallet. It supports Lightning and ecash. It provides you with a lightning address to receive zaps, and it fully supports NWC so you can connect your wallet to your client which gives you the ability to send zaps within the app without having to open a seperate wallet. It's free, and it's easy to use. Plus, none of the expenses or required maintenance associated with running a lightning node. Alternatively, you can use Coinos.io which provides basically the same functionality as Minibits except it's web-based so you can use it on all platforms.
The entire point of my original note was pointing out the differences between Breez, and Phoenix, and Zeus and Blixt. And everything I said in that regard is absolutely correct. If your only point is that Breez and Phoenix also run nodes, then fine. As I said, you can call them nodes if you want. I consider them pseudo-nodes. The point you're making is irrelevant to what I've said. Your point is a matter of semantics.
Clayton Bigsby! The blind black man who thinks he's white!
What Breez and Phoenix and Blitz do is markedly different from what Zeus and Blixt do. Can you consider Breez and the like to be nodes? Sure. But they're not full nodes with the ability for the user to open and close channels manually, or obtain inbound from the LSP of your choice. What Breez and Phoenix and Blitz do is more like an automated pseudo-node that operates in the background without user intervention.
Zeus is unlike Phoenix and Breez in that it runs a full LND node on your mobile device. Breez and Phoenix can open channels, but it's handled transparently in the background. Phoenix and Breez don't provide full Lightning nodes. And I may be wrong about this, but I don't believe Zeus uses Boltz for on-chain swaps. I put Breez, Phoenix, and Blitz in a seperate catagory from Zeus and Blixt Wallet, as both Zeus and Blixt run full LND nodes, and the others do not.
So sorry for your loss. I remember when I lost my father, and how difficult it was. It can take a while for it to really hit you. Allow yourself to grieve when it comes. Best wishes to you and your family during this painful time. 🫂
What does that even mean? Verified Bitcoiners? Does it mean they've somehow verified that you have a wallet? I don't feel very good about any of this
I thought we were supposed to repost to receive the zap. Do we also need to comment? If so, consider this my comment lol. I reposted the shortly after you posted the original note.
Well, Sparrow has a great reputation, and is trusted by quite a few people. But if you're looking for an alternative, Electrum may be worth a look. It's an on-chain and Lightning wallet that's as full-featured as they come. You can run a full Lightning node with it. I believe it supports hardware wallets, but I haven't personally used that functionality so I can't really comment on that. Electrum has been around since 2010 or 2011, and is relied on by many bitcoiners. It's at least worth a look.
My mind and my focus is greatest in the evening.
Wouldn't we discover their fossils, similar to how we discover dinosaur fossils?
Those coins will effectively be lost. Which I think is a shame for the Bitcoin ecosystem. Because we've got finite amount of coins, and coins that are lost have an impact on the total number of coins in circulation. I hope people who choose to die without making arrangements for their coins are few.
It’s for our new feature Taproot-based multisig wallets. You can read more about it in our announcement here: https://primal.net/e/note1lw30vds9um9j3p6qp8fmds67ay9tmu2r0qkta3v3zfas5ljadgvswnm06e
I have 2 of my 3 keys configured as Value Keys. To get the benefit of the Value Keys, do both signatures need to be Value Keys? Or do the benefits only require that one of the two required signatures be a Value Key?
I've just setup my Taproot multi-sig wallet using a 2/3 key configuration (software keys). I'm going to move some funds into it next week and I'll then be able to try out the two-round signing. I'll update you!
No doubt. I was pleased to the Nunchuk Wallet has an integrated inheritance system so you can setup a plan that will allow your chosen heirs to access funds you have earmarked for them. It will prevent the very issue you describe.