Not enough fat, I guess? Also in most cases not properly raised. But still waaaaay better than plant foods.
Nuts are seeds, which means they are the children of plants. In nature, children are most protected. If you meet a bear without children you're usually fine. If you meet a mother bear with children you're usually dead.
Plants can't run away from you or fight you with claws. They have to use chemicals instead. Thus nuts, being the children, have the most toxins to protect themselves from predators.
A great example is almonds. They literally contain cyanide. There's a saying that cyanide smells like almonds but the reality is almonds smell like cyanide because they literally contain it. People usually don't eat immediately lethal dose but it's still harmful. It destroys mitochondria.
Also plant proteins in general are not bioavailable. A chemist will tell you how much they contain but a biologist will tell you how much you can absorb - not much.
Again, as long as nothing specifically bad happens, there's no problem.
You're not spraying water on your house when it's not on fire.
Once there's an actual attack going on then we'll see.
Can't you just copy it within the phone's file system?
So must be monetary hardness.
It's not ideology.
51% attack means bitcoin is dead and with it the investments of the miners.
The miners would have to be super retarded to allow that.
Technically, switching pools is trivial. In practice, not so much. Foundry is the only option for regulated US public companies, the majority of the total hash rate. If it is so trivial for the rest, why do they sell their hash rate to Antpool, which has a track record of attacking Bitcoin and shipping closed source firmware with backdoors? Ask nostr:npub1wnlu28xrq9gv77dkevck6ws4euej4v568rlvn66gf2c428tdrptqq3n3wr or nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk, who know 1000X more about mining than the OP.
Regulated hashrate is terrible indeed. But which US law says Bitcoin miners are only allowed to connect to Foundry?
Anyway, the entire point of mining is to do it in secret, without having to tell the government. Maybe miners don't want to risk legal issues now but if their choice is lose the value of their investment (which 51% attack would cause) and risking legal issues they may as well pick the latter. The point of selling hashrate is to decrease variance and if Antpool is not harming BTC right now it's not a big deal.
I don't need to ask "authorities" that are about the same level of knowledge as me.
IIRC 2 blocks deep orphans still happen occasionally
AI is currently dumb AF. It may take hundreds of years to reach that point.
Nah, he's legit. Just because he might be wrong which you didn't support with evidence doesn't make him a scammer.
Annoyingly, wood is a plant and thus potentially toxic. Is there a better solution?
Maybe to avoid being accused of manipulation?
Depends on the purpose. To censor, yes, to double spend, no.
nostr:nprofile1qqs8fl79rnpsz5x00xmvkvtd8g2u7ve2k2dr3lkfadyy4v24r4k3s4sppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucn89ur9eu8h would say that it is quite feasible when the block template is owned by one large entity, while everyone sells their hashes to them via fpps.
Until they stop selling.
My impression is that even if it worked it would effectively be a hard fork, and the existing nodes would refuse to recognize transactions as long as they have the existing software.
But I could very well be wrong, because I'm still pretty fuzzy on how all of this works, but it has stuck with me that nostr:nprofile1qyv8wumn8ghj7urjv4kkjatd9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wsq3vamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qyvhwumn8ghj7um9dejxjapwdehhxenvv9ex2tnrdaksqgqyey2a4mlw8qchlfe5g39vacus4qnflevppv3yre0xm56rm7lveyr9lldz recommends not upgrading nodes with new software immediately.
Nope, 51% attack is a soft fork, not hard fork.
They don't as long as switching pools is trivial, which it is.