Truth has no ownership
Not shadow band, he quit. X still terrible…
I’m not waiting I don’t care. Network will be here when he’s ready.
One of the greatest podcast of all time https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/we-study-billionaires-the-investors-podcast-network/id928933489?i=1000503270615
I own 0 STRK - not enough upside, I’d rather have MSTR common. I own BTC and MSTR. For me it’s not either or, it’s both and the % split is personal. However I’ve done 100s of hours of research on MSTR and can tell you it’s the furthest thing from a scam. It’s the most clever way to lever BTC with a positive carry cost, by accessing previously untouchable pools of capital (due to fund charters). I’m not trying to sell you on it - I’m trying to say do more research if you want to make the claim it’s a fraud or ponzi and detail out why you think that.
This STRK product is $0.5B. They own $45B in btc. Their leverage ratio of pref equity and convertible bonds is <20%. This list all metrics, they are not leveraged enough! Do more research 🧐 www.Strategy.com
FYI anon, Solar Power displaces the most expensive section of the electricity cost curve, but can’t be the only form of generation. It allows for decentralization of monopoly electric utilities, by introducing competition where none has been. It will continue to dominate new generation deployment in US because of economics unless we stop trading with Asia. Tariffs or incentives are irrelevant.
Zaps ⚡️ are signal. Likes are nothing.
I thank them for the cheap sats 🙏
nostr:npub1s9z7pwy96thwt7zvmrlpfnddstezxxphx9rx3m0660sgkwld9eescjnszc why not have this discussion on NOSTR?
GM world!
Mossberg 500 https://www.mossberg.com/firearms/shotguns/500.html
I’d offer that I heard Jack say he was forced into the ban, in the way market dynamics force an outcome. Twitter was/is a for profit business that needs advertising revenue $ to exist and the implication was the advertisers required this action of the company or they would stop funding. Separately I’d add that any public/private business can take whatever actions it wants (ideally conforming to reasonable laws) so I find it a bit odd to imply that there’s some requirement that one of the executives who helped make those company decisions should be required to feel remorse / guilt /apologize if those decisions look bad in hindsight - even if that executive agreed the decision looked bad in hindsight which I’m guessing in this case is not true. These are hard decisions and Jack seems to be marching towards freedom and truth so I think cutting him some slack here is fair.
Good Morning to the value creators and yet-to-be value creators!
US Legalized Pharmaceutical TV Ads