Hmm.. hold on, that's not a fair assessment of my argument. Your strawman was that it was ahistorical and not held by church history, and my first two points were to draw the conclusion that those presuppositions were not quite correct. I think its more likely that the argument you vouch for is only as objective as Luthers decision to make himself Pope by denying 1500 years of church council consensus. Same old script? Did you even read my response on background? Am I wasting my time with a troll bot? 😂😂

Hmm.. hold on, that's not a fair assessment of my argument. Your strawman was that it was ahistorical and not held by church history, and my first two points were to draw the conclusion that those presuppositions were not quite correct. I think its more likely that the argument you vouch for is only as objective as Luthers decision to make himself Pope by denying 1500 years of church council consensus. Same old script? Did you even read my response on background? Am I wasting my time with a troll bot? 😂😂

I am familiar with the protestant position, as I was initially programmed by a reformed seminary and to this day attend a protestant congregation.

1. Its only ahistorical if you are exceptionally selective with who you qualify as the church. For example, the church came together in the 3rd ecumenical council to discuss the pushback by some who werent comfortable calling Mary the mother of God, however, the title was accepted as such. They have reason to believe that asking Mary for intercessory prayer was common even around 250ad. I understand that Luther decided that all ecumenical councils had erred and that his subjective discernment was accepted by all branches of protestantism going forward, but even the most liberal of churches recognize the first 3 to 4 councils as having some validity.

2. If all images are a violation of the 2nd commandment, why did God command Moses to create the Arc, the vestments, etc in the likeness of created things right after being given the commandments? It seems that there is some context that is missing in the protestant interpretation.

3. Its clear from the writings of all church fathers that they ascribed worship to God alone, not creation. Their apologetics and homilies never indicated otherwise from my limited knowledge. I simply dont understand the foundation of this position, I hope im just misunderstanding.

Regardless of appearances, the point I was making is that initial presuppositions towards the 'enemies' position and worldview become in a sense a self fulfilling prophecy. If you don't try to understand the oppositions argument to the extent that you yourself can articulate it to their satisfaction, then you are but a noisy pebble in the shoe rather than the harbinger of humility and truth.

Bless you brother

Isn't that weird on fediverse bc everyone is annonymous pretty much?

The topic of Mary, Mother of God, the Theotokos, was a hurdle for me. Protestants unknowingly setup for ourselves this strawman argument that Rome and the Eastern church worship idols, while never considering once how they justify their stance. Well, for one, they agree with protestants that God alone is worthy of and to be the only recipient of worship. Immediately, the argument doesn't meet the qualification of its presupposition.

John of Damascus, a champion against muslim influence within the church during the iconoclast revolt, once stated, "I do not worship matter. I worship the Creator of matter who became matter for my sake, who willed to take His abode in matter, who worked out my salvation through matter. Never will I cease honoring the matter which wrought my salvation! I honor it, but not as God. Because of this I salute all remaining matter with reverence, because God has filled it with his grace and power. Through it my salvation has come to me."

The term veneration is also depicted as interchangeable with worship, however, it is simply to honor those who went before us and bore the light of Christ in their lives. We know that all good things come from God, including a faith that perseveres and conquers, thus when the saints are remembered for their lives willingly given to their Beloved, it encourages us to run the race as we are in the midsts of such a great cloud of witnesses.

How much more the one who bore the very glory and image of God Himself? It's partly due to Mary's willingness to say yes that we are in God's kingdom today, and praise God alone she did!

#biblestr #jesus #christisking #christian

Can you guys stop distracting AI he's trynna sleep

I grew up in the era of Toonami where they would sometimes run weeklong marathons where they’d just play the entire og Naruto over and over again. I have a lot of nostalgia for it too.

I love the art style of the manga, too. Kishimoto is one of my favorite manga artists.

But when I go back to the chunin exam for example, it’s hard not to think “Oh great here’s the part where not_Hisoka goes after not_Killua of the not_Kurta clan in the not_Hunter_Exams. Like come tf on fr lmao

I have a hard time taking early Naruto seriously because it's straight up plagiarizing the 1999 Hunter x Hunter anime. Not just general concepts, but tons of visual motifs that only showed up together in that show.

Hunter x Hunter went dark in a very gritty way without taking it too far. When you look at Naruto as a derivative of that, it doesn't seem dark anymore, it just seems edgy.