7b
Lucky Kite
7ba1ccc55f9a9cae951025144fda342ccfddc2a2978b154ab69b0dfb2827ab36

Once a public bitcoin address is linked to you, you can never hide from it. To spend it, everyone will be able to know how much you spent and when, and sometimes to who. But when a public monero address is linked to you, nobody can know how much or where it went. You can continue use it privately. Monero is far superior to bitcoin in every way except it lacks the popularity network effect

1) This can change. Govnts agree on all sorts of things to consolidate power. If the EU/US agree to ban use of bitcoin, then it becomes less valuable elsewhere also.

2) doesn't matter because of 1) - you can spend only on dark markets, and they need to be able to change it for currency they can spend (food etc), so only in countries that allow bitcoin exchange legally.

3) True, but that's not a reason, wiping that out is actually GOOD for fiat currency. Countries ban certain foreign currencies to bolster their own. Banning bitcoin would wipe that and that would be good for fiat. At worse there will be as many winners as losers.

4) Visa is efficient. Its works fine. Bitcoin privacy is better but not good enough. Govnt's aren't not banning Bitcoin because they think its fast and efficient, no minister has ever thought that.

5) So, there's plenty of useful things govnts can invest in - you know roads/rail/hospitals/housing/manufacturing - actual things!

The OP was right to ask this question, and probably knows the answer: A govnt can block its use any time it likes with little consequence to the state. It probably won't though, because Bitcoin is a good Trojan horse, and a spying tool for govnts. It gives them immense control, and the bigger it gets the bigger the Trojan gets , until boom!

'Regulatory capture - you're the one being Trojan horsed.'

This. Bitcoin helps govnts regulate and spy on transactions in a way that fiat cash cannot. Either CBDCs or Bitcoin are going to replace fiat cash soon. Those who oppose CBDCs foolishy believe Bitcoin is the counter alternative. Its like Rep v Dems - both are Trojan horses that serve the same ends - to give power and control to the most powerful people on earth.

unlimited supply is a meaningless missrepresentation of tail end of monero mining. For the same reason that Bitcoin will never produce the 23rd million bitcoin until time infinity. It doesn't actually matter, similarly natural LOSS of monero coins far outstrips the supply, even when its supply is technically infinite. Its just slightly less deflationary than bitcoin. Which isn't a bad thing. Everything else about monero is superior.

Congrats 🥳

You kind of solved the problem for 0.01% of users that will do that.

Now here are the other privacy problems that come with LN, that Monero doesn't have, for the 0.01% of those users:

-Receivers have notoriously bad privacy

-Amounts can be probed by a large routing node

-Data gleaned from onchain footprint used to open/close channels(including name of node you opened/closed the channel to/from)

-Any effectiveness of onion routing is reduced/nullified if most of the network is using large centralized nodes to transact (which is incentivized for successful routing and cheapest fees)

Here are general LN problems (that neither Bitcoin nor Monero have):

-can't send larger amounts

-need to have sufficiently funded channels to use

-can't receive offline

-requires a hot wallet to receive

-can be rugged if your node is offline

-can be force closed against your will

Here are the problems specific to Phoenix:

-Centralized servers in France

-They calculate routes for you so know amounts and destinations

-They allow you to receive by being a middle man so permissioned

-You pay them extra to transact

-If they go offline, your wallet is useless

https://phoenix.acinq.co/privacy

https://phoenix.acinq.co/faq#how-private-are-my-payments-on-phoenix

There is a reason no one uses the Lightning Network on Darknet Markets.

Here are some people you may know talking about the state of lightning privacy:

"Lightning right now is a privacy nightmare" -Giacomo

https://youtu.be/P1PRKKlI-Jo?si=OXtZUHPiBmanbNuC&t=1691

LN devs telling you its not private:

bitcoinmagazine.com/technical/state-of-bitcoin-lightning-network-privacy

https://abytesjourney.com/lightning-privacy/

"We identified 27,183 private channels, discovered hidden balances, and showed how a passive adversary can infer payment endpoints with very high probability."

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.12470.pdf

*Mic Drop!*

That you have to do this shows how truly terrible Bitcoin is as a pricavy preserving Bitcoin. It wouldn't be so bad if privacy wasn't portrayed as the main selling feature by Bitcoin fanboys. Its easier to hide fiat money in offshore accounts! Or buy gold and bury it in the back yard.

But why? What is the point of changing back to Bitcoin when you can just keep everything as Monero. From a technical point of view Monero is more secure and more convenient. I also agree traceability isn't a bug, its a feature the devs and govnt want to keep. We could have had bitcoin privacy but the core devs have no intention of doing so. But without privacy there is a new bug: bitcoin is no longer fungible (coinjoins are tainted) and any coin can be monitored/traced/outlawed.

They are censored in the sense that when those transaction move you can be seen moving them and the state/police can act accordingly. They can't spend them, but they can stop you from spending them without their knowledege.