Avatar
thepurpose
7de3def8d21199c5ac7b82735cb3b6fb4837dfbc3cd3130b8ff085d50c384b43
I see connections. My hand is bigger than my mouth. I act accordingly. We are all winning. SimpleX Chat: https://smp10.simplex.im/a#6wfdxmiqUDxda-hUPcHAhxcUycg59v8ndQJpZJv6LRs Send me SimpleX Chat messages instead of nostr DM's.

Happened to me too several times. Have you the latest version of Amethyst installed?

Q: What is the underlying sense of the bitcoin saying "Go to McDonalds"?

A: McDonalds is always hiring and you can mine some fiat by trading your time and energy with your employer. This enables you to aquire the only asset which is not a shitcoin: Bitcoin.

AI battles for programmers are real already. Just play screeps -- a "MMO sandbox game for programmers"

"It means "scripting creeps"

It's an open-source game for programmers, wherein the core mechanic is programming your units' AI. You control your colony by writing JavaScript." -- https://screeps.com/

Never forget about the conversations tab in Amethyst. It's a lovely place! h/t nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z

What do you so about the proprietary hardware tradeoffs when using or recommending old laptops over SBC? I thought raspberries just have one proprietary hardware component: the graphics chip. 🤦

Thanks for clarification. 🫂

Watch the version of George Carlins non-self-sovereignty crushing talk used by nostr:npub1dergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsh9xzpc in his article "The Words We Use In Bitcoin"...

https://dergigi.com/2022/06/27/the-words-we-use-in-bitcoin/

And after you've been in the middle of the article for watching the video, scroll to the top and start reading.

It's a brilliant guidance for how to talk to the upcoming bitcoiner generations without compromises on correctness or comprehendability.

Use the new language from now on and not tomorrow or just later. Change your language. I did so as well. Thank you nostr:npub1dergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsh9xzpc. 🫂

Replying to Avatar jimmysong

The Case for a Chain Split

The debate surrounding drivechains has been heating up, with proponents employing various tactics to garner support. This divisive issue echoes previous disputes in the Bitcoin community, such as the 2017 block size controversy. As such, we should consider what was then the definitive resolution: a chain split.

A significant portion of the Bitcoin community rejects drivechains, effectively blocking its implementation via a soft fork. Bitcoin's voluntary nature makes it resistant to hostile takeovers, despite claims that miners could force the change. Disagree with that last statement? Then let's put that to the test. We can resolve this posturing and propaganda by forking the code.

Here's how it would work: Code implementing drivechains would be released. Those who support the proposal can run this code. A transaction that goes against drivechain rules but adheres to pre-drivechain rules will trigger a chain split. Those running the drivechain software wouldn't be doing anything, but nodes that aren't can reject the drivechain chain by using the "invalidateblock" command. The result will be two distinct Bitcoins: one with drivechains and one without.

This approach was resolved the conflict we had in August 2017, when Bitcoin Cash split off from Bitcoin. Similarly, proponents and opponents of drivechains can either hold or sell their respective Bitcoins post-split. This would be a real-world test of control and game theory within the network.

I advocate for this split not just for potential profits, but also because it's a peaceful solution. It would let us see in real time how convicted the drivechain people are. Will drivechain miners support it if it means mining at a loss? A chain split would serve as a critical learning opportunity for the community, providing a clear answer to the ongoing debate. Ultimately, this will strengthen Bitcoin by showing the market how hard it is to change its properties.

So bring it on! Fork or shut up.

https://void.cat/d/SEbocwy3dabt6xJaaXM5Sk.mp3

OK. OK. OK. Let's play TACS! Transaction Activated Chain Split? Or should we acronym the game with the same pattern as we did in the important old days, UACS?

Zeroes / zeros are risky. Zero day, ground zero, from zero to hero, zero conf, zero proof. Maybe one is better of with mu, which the japanese culture uses as word for indescribable situations/ experiences/ phenomena.

nostr:nevent1qqs99ed0xdhf5mspyzfwmv7p3e4u2vw5lav0t0puawvxhwcztwd080qpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzvupzp3yw98cykjpvcqw2r7003jrwlqcccpv7p6f4xg63vtcgpunwznq3qvzqqqqqqyh8rcxk