Yes, given varying performance levels for relays it should probably assign each relay a weight. (Haven’t read the links yet, just woke up)
Where can I follow the discussion around relay gossiping? #[0] recently mentioned that people have been talking about it, but nothing is set in stone.
Clearly the protocol wraps around the idea that messages themselves can recommend relays. e.g. a user profile contains their relay list & any event can include recommended relays when referencing other events and pubkeys.
My naive initial thought is that clients should
connect to a set of relays that give access to all the pubkeys you follow + all the relays you define as your own
when they see a new kind 0 profile clients should republish this to all the relays they are connected to (thereby propagating profiles eagerly)
Something like.
* Your profile's relay set {A, B, C}
* You follow alice, who has a relay set of {A, F, H}
* You also follow bob , who has a relay set of {E, F, G}
* At runtime, a client connects to {A, B, C, F} because you should always connect to your own set, plus you need to connect to something that knows about bob's events. We choose F because it's weighted higher for us, because alice also publishes there and we can get more redundancy.
When we see bob update their profile, we republish the new profile to every relay we're connected to so that more people know how to find bob. He would have written to {E, F, G} but with our help his profile is also in {A, B, C}
Nihonostr
They rewrote the original ror app in Scala back when it was new hotness.
I remember seeing a tweet of just this many years ago. Tesla with a frunk full of miners just hanging foul at a charging station.
Yes. I listened to the podcast for quite a few episodes until recently. They've been talking nothing but AI for about 6 eps now.
Question about nip-19 bech32 encoding with prefix `note`: This is defined as being for event ids, but should it be applied to kind=1 notes only?
Can anyone point me to a discussion about kind 6 (repost) deprecation? What was the original NIP?
dope 
Truth be told, #[4] probably already shipped what I’m trying to do
I don’t get the appeal of AI code generation. It automates the trivial and you still need to review it closely for bugs.
Gm #[0]
I am too, but only because my wife wants access. :). I prefer and previously used https://www.passwordstore.org/
