Yes you can!

I’ve looked at the chart. I’ve also looked at the world.

Fiat clings to control. Bitcoin bows to visibility.

Monero doesn’t promise riches—it promises refuge.

I’m not here for price. I’m here for principle.

#PrivacyOverProfit #NoFaceNoTrace #XMRgirl #DigitalRefusal

You don't have one in your basement? 😆

"Chicago Mass Shooting and Killing ... 19 people were shot at the Mello Buckzz Album Release Party Outside The Artist Lounge on Chicago & Franklin"

IDK who needs to hear this but if you voted Republican, this is your fault.

It’s living rent free in his head.

Bitcoin only needs a move up of less than 3% to shut this guy up forever.

I agree with that one. But it won’t stop them from running into debt. And it doesn’t change other issues. For example, blue laws. I think that your “no loans/borrowing” might be a good idea, but I think that is one of many other fixes required.

One of many fixes that the USA needs if it is to survive.

The Sunset Amendment

- Preamble

For far too long, our Congress has passed far too many laws, with far too many of these laws being direct infringements upon the rights of each American citizen. These laws are too numerous and too long. And the volume of American federal law poses many problems.

1. Redundancy and excessive complexity: There are laws against assault, and then laws against “hate crimes”, which include assault. There may be one law for a specific crime, but then the penalties were amended in 3 subsequent laws. Circumstances like this make it near impossible for a regular American to perform the due diligence required to understand the laws that he may be subject to and must obey. If every single American must understand hundreds of years of often contradictory laws that often reference each other, then it is unreasonable to expect Americans to understand that law, let alone abide by it.

2. Undermining our Legal process and confidence therein: With such an impossibly long list of laws that are considered “in effect”, it becomes inevitable that some laws become forgotten and cease to be enforced. These laws cease being culturally, legally, or politically relevant, yet remain legal in all official contexts. This creates multiple corollary issues:

A. This produces a lack of confidence in the American citizen that the older laws that SHOULD be enforced ARE being enforced. It causes a reasonable American to wonder if there is a bias or political malintent associated with the informal decision of which older laws should continue to be enforced.

B. This also produces proverbial “landmines” where a political or legal actor can maliciously discover a forgotten and long irrelevant law begin to selectively enforce it for one’s own individual or political purposes. A bad actor, in this context, could work to resume the enforcement of a previously unenforced and forgotten law against enemies that could not have been reasonably expected to know that they were violating a law at all.

C. Resistance to correction of errors: “Nothing is more permanent than a temporary government program”. Entire departments, bureaucratic institutions, and other government systems and policies continue to last well beyond the necessity of their initial intent. These systems exist both as a burden on the American taxpayer—requiring him to continue to fund organizations that have long since outlived their utility for him—and as a reminder that rights, once lost, will continue to be infringed even when the folly of the law that infringed on those rights has become evident. One needs to look no further than laws against the private ownership of alcohol distillation equipment, which were created as a part of the federal prohibition on alcohol which has since been overturned for almost 100 years, to see that laws cannot be written to last indefinitely if we are to retain our Republic indefinitely.

It is for the above reasons that we, the American people, present this Amendment to the Constitution to our Congress, to pass it on our behalf, to save this Republic.

- Amendment Text

No law passed by Congress, as per Article 1 of the Constitution shall remain in effect for a period of 15 years or longer. Each law, when it has reached the 14th year since it has passed, shall be brought before each chamber and be reviewed on the grounds of its necessity, intent, and results. Between the 14th and 15th year, that law may then be amended, expanded upon, or removed from the body of American law. For a law to remain in effect past its 15th year, Congress must vote on and pass the law anew as per Article 1, sections 1 and 7.

The body of laws currently in place when this Amendment is passed, will be divided into three groups by the Senate by the first Monday in December after its passage. The first group of laws shall require review by Congress as per the first paragraph of this Amendment within 6 years of its passage and will cease to be law if not passed anew by the 7th year. The second group shall require review by Congress within 13 years after the passage of this Amendment and will cease to be Law if not passed anew by the 14th year. The third group will require review by Congress within 20 years of the passage of this Amendment and will cease to be Law if not passed anew by the 21st year.

- Rebuttal of Criticisms

- “This is what we need term limits for”

1. Laws, not politicians: The issue is not politicians, it is laws. For sure, there are plenty of bought-out and corrupt politicians. But a good politician can work for his or her entire career and still be unable to overturn a bad law from well before his or her time.

2. Forever campaigns: the time a politician needs the most money and is at most risk is when they are first running for office. Setting term limits (especially short ones) will create a vulnerability to compromise in our elections by allowing powerful interests even more opportunities to buy elections that would have otherwise not have been available to purchase. It will also create a PAC industry that professionally produces new politicians beholden to them.

3. Lame-Duck Radicalism: the primary motivation for politicians to do well by their constituents is to gain re-election. Term limits remove this potential entirely and, thereby, remove consequences for pushing unfavorable radical policy at the end of their final terms. This is even worse when such radical actions might help secure some sort of quid-pro-quo deal with a private entity for the lame-duck politician to move into after their term is complete. And then, once the radical bill is passed, it is near permanent, like almost all other government institutions, even though the politician themself had a term limit.

Did Elon the dumb fucking moron break X again or is this just happening to me

A gate employee at Narita airport in Tokyo read aloud my Japanese Satoshi shirt. I called back, "yes, Satoshi," as I walked to the ramp. He gave me a thumbs up. Hopefully he understood it and is a bitcoiner. unfortunately I will never know.

Mute packs definitely should be a thing

Noise is loud when it doesn’t understand the signal. Laugh while you can — some of us are vanishing.

Massie is wrong. Nobody can drain the swamp in one go. $5 Trillion is a pocket change. Move beyond it, move pass it. When the Wold's Balance come to 100 trillion, or higher, $5 trillion will gain a new context.

Move pass it.

Monero stands as the ultimate private store of value.

It's the gold standard for secure and confidential wealth preservation.

There is no second best

BREAKING: Iran's foreign minister says Trump should 'put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone' towards the Supreme Leader if he wants a deal

⚡️🇹🇭🐔 INSOLITE - Thai farmers are feeding their chickens leftover cannabis, noting better poultry health and more tender meat.

Did you hear the new gospel?

There will be a great war, and everyone will die except the Jews in Israel, and Christians need to support Israel so they will be blessed by God, otherwise we will be cursed. Jerusalem will be the eternal city of God where only Jews are allowed while Christians are all dead and "in heaven."

Am I the only one that reads the bible and thinks this is insanity?

The sites that we hit in Iran were totally destroyed, and everyone knows it. Only the Fake News would say anything different in order to try and demean, as much as possible — And even they say they were “pretty well destroyed!” Working especially hard on this falsehood is Allison Cooper of Fake News CNN, Dumb Brian L. Roberts, Chairman of “Con”cast, Jonny Karl of ABC Fake News, and always, the Losers of, again, Concast’s NBC Fake News. It never ends with the sleazebags in the Media, and that’s why their Ratings are at an ALL TIME LOW — ZERO CREDIBILITY!

Tune into No Agenda next week for discussion about how America is beating China!

Update on cook. About 3.5 hours in. She’s looking beautiful if I say so myself.

nostr:note1nwkys6tazjzppdk277klzzggzgrd73qu6h860a26s7wmfhr92g7sz24sqv

Would appreciate being fact-checked on this:

The US is the only country in its history to have abolished a central bank more than once.

Now that's something.

It's the same issue in all countries not just in the USA. By the way you should not be drinking raw or processed milk once you are past being an infant. The billion dollar milk industry has brainwashed humans into thinking it's normal to drink milk forever.

so nothing's gonna change?

It's Monday in Japan/Korea/Australia, in fact markets are open for the week already. So could be day time trading

For me, it's 3 am. Real Mongolian hours.

The kimchi arbitrator is awake.