Avatar
TheDarrenator
9d607476bce1fa93f437f9c70c40b332d178b03fd43208201e2b59a0ac7a9172
Traditional, Bible-believing #Catholic husband. #Privacy tech ( #XMPP, #Signal, #Session, etc.). #Monero. Anti-Rainbow flags. #Keto / #Carnivore / #Fasting , etc. Accepting Monero (XMR) tips at nosmero.com! XMR wallet address: 8BF4dH9w393Lf4vKPSC5ds4PWhai3DZxkXi6XA8snuSwJqcuAnyFgUL32bimDQ2z6mJminHhcX2A8VcxfRFVYWoU1286Kgt)

"I wish I had aborted my last two kids."

"I wish I had spent more late nights at the office."

FILL IN THE BLANK:

No one says on their deathbed, __________.

I honor women; I don't hate them.

I'm just no fan of feminism, unless we redefine it as compatible with masculinism.

That's right. It's not legit to see marriage as a romantic contract agreement with exception clauses. Deep down, that's not what men and women really want.

A lot could be said here, but as one who loves and respects women, I would not say they are "hidden away" when they stay at home to care for the family.

I'm not buying our society's lie that a woman reaches her full potential only when she finds employment away from the home. Her role as mother and homemaker is an awesome responsibility to be honored, not belittled.

Ask any honest, non-simping man if he would not love to have a wife who cares for their children at home during the day, who makes their house a home, who acts like a wife instead of a husband. His answer will be YES. Even HECK YES.

And ask yourself: Would you really respect a husband who chooses to stay at home instead of going to work; who expects you to go out and make money; who focuses on looking after the children, bottle-feeding them, and putting them down for nappy time; who do some sewing or decorating or reading; who ask what you'd like to eat after a hard day at the office? Deep down, I think you would say NO. Even HECK NO. I don't think your marriage or romance life would thrive in that situation.

I miss the days when your "community" was the neighborhood you lived in.

It's ironic how today's popular usage of the word "community" is actually quite divisive.

I'm not part of the crypto community, the Linux community, or the kayaking community. I just happen to like those things.

Mom and Dad are both responsible, but we need not expect them to share the same roles in parenting. Men and women are different; moms and dads are different.

Women are even blessed to have a reflection of their nurturing gifts built into their bodies. They grow their children inside their bodies, and feed them with their bodies, giving of themselves. It's a beautiful thing.

Men are typically stronger and more aggressive, less "nurturing" but more protective and geared toward leadership. Women don't like wimps or sissies, and men don't like barking, independent broads. There is a complementarity between the sexes and between mothers and fathers.

We don't have to pretend we're equal. We're different, and that's okay. We can be different but equal in worth and dignity. Though I have to say women are pretty special. Y'all are awesome.

Replying to Avatar zhenya

Would nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a family be better off with her as home maker and her husband a car salesman?

I don't know her, but I've known car salesmen who make a respectable living.

It's true that two wage earners make more money combined. But a solid family is more important than wealth.

In many cases (not all), a family can save money by Mom momming her kids, acting as the heart of the home, while Dad works as the breadwinner, dadding and husbanding when he comes home.

If he makes 60k a year and she makes 600k, they won't have to give up eating if she quits and raises the kids and keeps the home. They just might have to give up expensive vacations and some extra cars and boats.

Depends on what a person's priority is in this short life.

I don't think worshiping the dollar is a good investment.

It's best for lady to mom up and homey to dad up, even if their economic standard of living is lessened (as long as they have food and shelter).

Money is not more important than family life. But a good, stable family life statistically results in better finances generationally.

I'm not judging. I know it's hard. Just saying.

I didn't mean it as the strictest one-size-fits-all solution. We all have to eat, so we have to do what we have to do to survive.

But (here's my morality advice) it should be the norm for a mother not to routinely leave her children for others to look after.

That's not a compelling argument considering murder is an unjust killing of human life.

The giver of life has every right to take it. But we all know that the Bible does not portray God as an out-of-control, evil, murderous maniac.

The high cost of child care is crippling family finances.

Here's my tip:

Moms, quit your job, sell the extra car, donate your heels and pantsuits, prepare home-cooked meals, and care for your own family.

The financial savings will add up.

And you and your husband and your children will be happier.

Homosexusl couples cannot "have sex" with each other.

Otherwise, we'd have to say licking a carrot and sticking it in our ear is called "eating."

But we're too educated about the digestive system to think that. And we should be just as educated about the repriductive system.