Listening to people defend Biden's presidency is the lowest point in American politics. The bar is so low for his performance that the logic is literally, "Well, he didn't shit himself or stare into space. He's got this".
People, the presidency is not for participation ribbons. Geopolitics is not bingo night at the old folks home.
#Trump2024
Could be. Or maybe your post wasn't as clever as you thought.
So, can someone explain what happened in France?
Last month, there were record protests against macron "the centrist"... Conservative party takes lead, snap elections which put Le pen's party in power, and then I missed what came next. But the next headline I see is that the ultra leftists are in power and introducing a 90% tax.
Wait... What?!
What kind of ideas would be considered Popular Christianity?
I told the bull run.
Whoa there. Whats with the hostility? The US has become the #1 nation for child sex crimes over the last 20 years. I don't think that's "thirsty old men".
If you want to see who's fuckin the kids, you should probably research which areas have kids popping up with monkeypox.
Maybe teenage behavior has been changing over the decades... you know, like your data shows. π€·ββοΈ
Lol, does it though? I'm about as free market as one gets, but...
Don't force it. Just let it go man. They aren't that good.
they don't want you to think that.. That's what they were doing. Older generations didn't have endless hours of scrolling and Netflix. They had 3 TV channels and a radio, and that wasn't even until the 60's.
My grandfather was one of 32 kids. 16 kids by 2 different wives... They were having a lot of sex, and playing a lot of dominoes. They were much happier than we are now.
With God, man can govern himself. Without God, there can only be more government.
Have you read Fredrick Bastiat? the first question of any legislation should be, "Is this the proper role of the law?" If you did outlaw it, would it stop the tech from being used?
From where I stand, if the tech exists, it will be used.
But it doesn't sound like you're asking about the tech as much as you're asking about it's usage. Outlawed for who, Citizens or Government?
Do you see an inconsistency here?
And I'm not saying you're wrong about the guy. I'm just saying that I'll reserve judgement. The world does not want him to succeed. they want him to fail because of he clears his government and society of corruption, then there's no excuse form the rest of the western world. Their corruption becomes obvious.
Everything they said can't be done, is being done... Brussels can't have that. "You need the IMF and to model your laws after the UN agendas."
He's proving the wrong, and they hate him for it. π€·ββοΈ
I'll wait before condemning him.
I mean, the context is completely different. I get it. You don't like the guy and he doesn't pass your personal standards of what constitutes a leader.
If we're going back to the oriinal post, the I agree. He is different. The difference lies in what's promoted. He's not pushing "the narrative". The western "social justice warrior" type of stuff. He's pushing the national identity of his people. Not the bullshit they press on the world through Brussels and the WEF.
But statecraft is still statecraft. You can't pretend you have law and order when you don't. If you don't have law and order, then how do you bring people to justice? You can't. That order has to be established. You do that through strength.
The founding of every nation is done through war and brutality. A nation is forged.
I think the judgment is a little harsh. He's not doing anything different from any other administration across any nation in the world. He's using the force of the state to bring stability.
It's not usually called blackmail. That's usually reverved for salacious information, but I agree... I kinda boils down to Blackmail. It is how the game is played across the board. It's not ideal, but it is, in fact, the way the game is played.
We do it all the time. It's how intelligence works all over the world. "You know, and I know what you've done. Play nice, or I'll come for you".
Pretty standard stuff.
You answered a rhetorical question and not a the real one, but I can appreciate that not a single nation on earth meets your ideal.
That being said, I'll ask again. Why do you think Bukele offering a warning about bribes and corruption in what was the #1 hotspot for criminality in the world, somehow just his opinion?
in your opinion, how does one establish order in an area without law and order? What would step #1 be?
points of view are shaped by experience. It's not irrelevant at all. I'm trying to understand why you are applying principles of a civilized society to a nation that was reborn within the last 5 years.
No other western nation upholds the standard you're trying to impose on Bukele. Is it the ideal, of course.
But reality rarely works that way. Do you think Washington is a beacon of chivalry and honor or do you think there's a pretty healthy amount of bribery and corruption?
If that's true of the world's leading democracy, then why do you think Bukele giving warning about bribes and corruption in a nation that was the #1 hotspot for criminality is somehow just his opinion?
Sometimes you have to act according to what you have, not according to what you want.


