hmmm... I couldn't zap this note, but I was able to zap your profile directly. Mabye iOS broke the note zaps again?
Your were a beast on a mission!... I'd be surprised if it didn't start smokin'
Pretty sure this is it:
nostr:npub1c878wu04lfqcl5avfy3p5x83ndpvedaxv0dg7pxthakq3jqdyzcs2n8avm
You don't have to have both windows on the screen at the same time. The 2nd window provides more space for the tab titles. Just Alt-Tab to switch from looking at one window of tabs to the other.
"Open link in new window"?
Is this a scam? 😉
... heck, it was actually well worth the laugh of getting told the misunderstanding is *our* fault.
Well, at least the cost of getting scammed was virtually nil.
They probably just changed the definition again (kinda like how they do with 'inflation')... so they could pivot from "The government needs to intervene" to "Look how good government intervention works".
If you have multiple versions of your follow list on different relays, you can now republish the one you want on Nosta. More here: https://primal.net/e/note1nytp4xafgff7cvpxu0uzye6j99m0fle23k8xuqrglah09hdt7qhsrre9nd
Cool! Though, at the moment, the site appears to be broken in general: "Sorry, could not find a profile with the publicKey..."
When industry isn't owned by the state; but is subjugated to the state, that is an aspect of fascism - which refers to itself as a form of socialism.
That's also a BIG could.
If anything, such a reveal would just serve to drive home the point that 'creator' ≠ 'controller'.
"Those who can, do. Those who can't, [pretend they can on TV]".
Completely agree. Nobody should feel like they have to apologize for creating a curated space with whomever they wish to share it.
My one quibble is that effectively it *is* censorship, and we should just own it. Because, unless you're a government compelled to treat its citizens neutrally, I think it's a mistake to treat 'censorship' as if it's a bad word. Of course, the beauty of Nostr is that there isn't just one, nor even just a few, curated (or not) spaces.
"Also, these kinds of violations don't generally get enforced unless the violations are egregious."
John Oliver actually considers the arbitrariness of the enforcement of regulations to be a defense of Chevron Deference (the recently overturned court doctrine which had effectively hamstrung a defendant from challenging a regulatory agency's interpretation of a law)... He later offers a plea to "elect people who value ... the Rule of Law". 🙄
https://video.nostr.build/002bcfdac9b06b8e4a9a3ae0bf3f5bda67159948b404e3fe8f6a082a9ab8748a.mp4
* "Also, these kinds of *regulations* don't generally get enforced unless the violations are egregious."






