and?

what are the guardrails for improper cross referencing of the hashtags? are they traceable across apps/across relays? could you start a storm on damus and cause it with a hashtag tag on another platform without it being "traceable". for example.

yeah, that's just what everyone needs. more standing in line and waiting their turn in the bread lines.

hyper sanitary order is a collection process for fascist governance, not for useful and organic evolution. by forcing slow paced excessive order and compliance to be sure no drop is spilled - it creates the very lack of freedom which was the antithesis of the idea for tracking pow in the first place.

that's already the case if you read this properly. especially for cyberspace "oversight". however the true nature of the design of the smart technology apparatus is hidden from the general public, leading them to believe there are still decades before this is even possible. when in reality, the early ai models already jumped the tracks or fizzled out - and it is secrecy and jargon which keeps the public from being able to protect themselves usefully. trickle down theory is and has always been ridiculous - whether it is actually money or *information* economics... insert pursed lips and irritated face here.

haha. no.

amplifies, from what i have seen.

how long until it's not allowed either?

interesting short doc.

i think it's important to distinguish the apex control lies in ai/agi bot tech scaffolding. and i'm doing so, control is handed to the computer intelligence and smart validator apparatuses - with a human oligarchy overseeing them. if that's so acceptable and interesting and a savior system: why not say that instead of skirt the issue and talk in crossworded programmer code? if universal adoption is really the goal: why not make the compression accessible? jargon is a gatekeeing methodology, not an act of inclusivity.

what's it rescuing?

define "bitcoin core" without jargon.

in the old days (pre- 1900) girls and boys were trained to perfect a skill - mason - when they were abled. girls would knit or sew or crochet or embroider; more intelligent women would be musical or do something academic like paint but it was not preferred. boys would be craftsmen, work with wood or study etc. men *could* be academic so there was more of an outlet for them to DOCUMENT their skills and discoveries in canon - writing, academia, master works etc. skilled craftsmen formed the middle class this way, hence "freemason" - they were self-trained and had a moveable occupation. the idea behind having something to do with your hands was rooted in the proof of work concept: you might zone out in a meditative state and work in the astral, but you had something to show for the time spent off "working". women who were idle were considered a threat, crazy, or lazy - doing handiwork or housework or some sort of task was a cover for ability. men formed skilled labour and had hobbies like flora and fauna collections, "studies" and "curios" in the victorian age especially - they gathered things like talismans too in order to show their pathways to what they discovered. victorian collections were a lot like blocks or filing cabinets: they only made sense to the cryptographic gatherer unless here was a useful catalogue which was comprehensible to someone else. darwin was interesting because of that.

ⴲ.

since there's very little new content in meta and it's all just stole stake, there's nothing to discuss. it's all being developed elsewhere. that's the thing about conversation: it requires multi-lateral effort and engagement. "posting" is what they do on facebook. conversation is content creation - the foundation of what proof of work models are. most of meta is just splashy performance - there's no substance. hence why it's already a ghost town.

mark doxxed openai's model - he didn't open source an original idea. stop talking around it. lex knows exactly what zuckerberg is and does - or i thought he did. i cannot understand why you all protect the very predators gnawing away at you. what? because he has a black book and threatens everyone? the biggest blackmailers are the ones with the biggest secrets. like, for example, meta is shell value -

and who is "george hotz"...?

where do you keep the dollars once you convert the cash from the bitcoin?🙂

solid. i am interested to see what else you do.

the first episode w jack, it was an interesting convo - i genuinely liked the casual relaxed approach.

why shelves empty tho.

i aim to please. round 2 soon. i have to order my pizza. 🍕

i personally wanna discuss why it was in south fucking dakota.

https://www.nytimes.com/1983/09/17/us/robert-kennedy-jr-faces-charge-of-heroin-possession-in-s-dakota.html

i disagree. all content created will always have a ghost footprint so it will never be unique again. even with the stamps erased, a reupload of old pow will always be assailable as "potential copies" because ai will retain the imprint of the material. if the entirety of bitcoin blockchain collapsed - none of the content would be reusable as new because the memory would remain. even if a new blockchain trunk was created after a cataclysmic erasure - agi would still recognise old content memory from imprinting. it's impossible to game. if you read the white paper carefully - it basically says this. the timestamp of the data exists regardless of the ledger - and any marginal

agi would be able to read the code and determine it's lack of originality. it's the same reason nfts fraud was exposed so easily and the market collapsed. "scraping" would simply be a recollection of old data - but there would be an eventual redistribution of content to the creators because no one will stand for their original work being claimed by head hunters and stolen in the long term.

and duck duck go.