We use AI to improve engineering productivity at Casa, such as for writing boilerplate code and for performing various sanity checks during code reviews.

But the AI is often wrong. It will write brittle code, it will make incorrect recommendations on code reviews. AI is just a tool; it remains critical to have competent engineers as part of the process to guide these tools with skilled hands.

I like that they let me buy stuff with sats. The software is superb and doesn't require cli ninja skills.

AIPAC has more influence than the oil lobby.

You’ll never have enough money to buy the influence of people who have are subjugated by the people who have power.

You are getting hosed. Your game is weak. You are strengthening shitcoins. If you were playing th game properly we would have dev protections for privacy and self custody already. All we hear out of Washington is pump my bags.

I yhibk everything on your list is a political calculation and most help shitcoins as much if not more than Bitcoin which make them a net negative.

Freeing Ross was amazing however we still face the real legal threat against developers who are guilty of simply writing software that can be used for illegal shit. Ross was simple famous enough for trump.

I don’t see a bitcoin reserve…there’s a good chance it will contain shitcoins as well.

Choke point 2.0 probably did more to crush shitcoins than it did against Bitcoin.

Gary Gensler was worse for shitcoins than he was for Bitcoin.

401ks are opened to shitcoins.

Being a trump appointee is pretty meaningless in the face of his fuckery.

His company will be the first one to sell bitcoin.

probably should start a policy org, an open source charity, and a venture fund to hit it from all angles

I guess more accurately what no one wants to hear. My spidey senses are tingling even more than when trump turned pro crypto to buy votes. It’s going to get worse before it gets better. We may have to play the politics game.

What no one wants to talk about is that bitcoiners went hard for trump but apparently are naive and didn’t realize he is a grifter. Trump surrounded himself with shitcoiners and surveillance capitalists like musk and Theil. Still bitcoiners told us to trust the plan. His god damn VP is the unholy spawn of peter Theil and an Ivy league synthetic womb. Did anyone actually believe they would support privacy and self custody? They are pushing bitcoin to pump their bags and then they will drop the hammer harder than anything you would have seen out of the democrats. They want total control and are retarded enough to think we will let them have it.

New Q-Day.

Oh yeah, I would love to see them in Blue Wallet. Do you know any other mobile wallet which supports that?

Anyone who has actually ever used bitcoin knows that not letting users see their keys is a fucking crime.

Everyone should read Die With Zero. It's not merely about spending all your money before you die.

It's about realizing there's a complex relationship between your money, time, and health.

The value of each changes over your lifetime and, as such, you should strive to maximize the utility of each when it's appropriate.

Respectfully, the claim that we 'only exist to get users to join premium bullshit services' is the opposite of reality.

Since day one, we have been pouring huge resources into building and maintaining a professional-grade Bitcoin wallet and offer it for free. We led the way with standards like BIP129, advanced coin control and were first with features like encrypted group wallet and Taproot/MuSig2 support. We do this because we believe that if the majority of Bitcoin is not in self-custody, the project will fail. In fact, the vast majority of our users are free users, and we dedicate about 80% of our development efforts each year to free features.

Calling our premium services 'bullshit' is a mischaracterization. They solve critical, high-stakes problems for people who need them, and the revenue from those services is precisely what allows us to keep the core wallet free, private, and independent.

The alternative is VC funding, ads, or tracking users. We're committed to building a sustainable business on a Bitcoin standard, and we believe our model is the right one for our users and for Bitcoin itself.

A big conservative political podcast (seven figure YouTube subscribers) asked me to come on and talk about bitcoin (sat next to them on the plane out of the May conference in Vegas, which sparked their request).

Last week when I went on the show, they decided to emphasize a talking point of why tariffs are great and will usher in a golden age, and some questions about bitcoin.

When asked about tariffs, I generally disagreed that they would be bullish or usher in a new golden age, mentioned that the past three months of data doesn’t show a decline in import prices which means it has been a tax on Americans, and eventually we moved to discussing bitcoin.

They ended up not airing the talk, and instead ran the clip with someone else who agreed on the tariff points. Waste of time, basically.

It’s a reminder that a big percentage of what you see in heavily politicized media is about narrative framing and talking points rather than genuine attempts to discuss or explore. It reminded me why I normally decline to go on political shows; I had only agreed to this one because the catalyst was in person and so the agreeable side of me was like “sure, why not”.

Well, that’s why not.

QED.

There will always be people who are beyond help, and you must accept this.

These matters are very hard to understand for the layman, and so “thinking” like this which is entirely surface layer is expected and perfectly normal.

Going deeper into the mind is going deeper into the illusion.

The one is all & the all is one.

The truth exists within paradox & the mind doesn't like paradox.

I'm still amazed how many "truth seeking bitcoiners" fall for evolution.

Yea i agree i’m not making an accurate full representation of the religion, but theres thousands of years of backstory thats been added by humans, so that would be very hard for either of us to do.

I’m just saying all the things you talk about and mention are still human based. Any description of Jesus as god is all human based. Everything.

I would have more of an open mind if it was a more general discussion, but Christianity to me is just one of the many man-made businesses/companies of the religion industry. One of the best, most successful and profitable, yes. Making it one of the most popular. But i just can’t take anything said serious when theres so much bullshit to wade through.

I get you have parts and portions that you agree with and hold on to, i respect that. I just can’t do the same. We just different in that way i guess.

Faith is….a complicated word in general…at best haha

The Word did not stop being God and turn into a man instead.

Rather, he remained God and acquired or assumed to himself a human nature, which is to say, a human body and soul. He didn't change into something else, but added to himself. That's an important distinction to make.

If we insist that God stopped being God when he became a man, then we reject the truth that he is the great "I AM." Instead we make him out to be the "I USED TO BE."

If that were the case, he wouldn't have been truly God from the start -- just like using a pencil eraser to erase permanent ink would mean it wasn't really permanent ink to begin with.

OPs what dollar hegemony to last as long as possible because their conviction still wanes