Even if you believe in God and "objective morality" exists, it makes no sense to blindly accept the teachings of organized human religions as the undistorted pure manifestations of that objective morality.

Because no ground truth can be established, it makes more sense to live as it if it does not exist and try to establish a human-consensus sort of morality.

I'm not claiming anything more than what is on thr original post.

Hey look a table that forces you to pick the lesser evil, so convincing

I classify it as homosexuality. It's descriptive enough

Agree, there's no where else where we can discuss things like this.

The latter point is an interesting one worth discussing. Is morality subjective or absolute?

My perspective is that it's local in time and space and (like bitcoin) it's based on broad social consensus (which is hard to change but can and did happen).

This means that it's neither individually subject nor arbitrary or random. There's a consistency to it, otherwise the whole concept would be pointless.

nostr:nevent1qqs8he6kvh4zdd6f90hwtnc0st3mxe9gwf6q7wgcmxktdvlthhgzqzspgdmhxw309amkjmn9ve5kcar9wfkksutf0pu85mtw0fuxsundv96kvurwvecnxunddf3kcdn9dy6r26tex3skjerjdenhqumed9jzummwd9hkuq3qu895rj0zlqu55rtfxdyh6cu6nsxhck9qqqyut3qe6gkf2xjtv8vqxpqqqqqqz4p7ej8

Starting off with a nuanced wall of text rarely starts up a good discussion. You need bait and then grown ups can talk

Human-powered sentiment analysis 😅

Agree

I'm sorry for the wrongthink, I will try to abide by the majority's narrative next time 🫂

This is my most unpopular note ever... And I thought leftists were the ones boasting about their moral superiority and imposing it on everyone else 😅.

nostr:nevent1qqswwax2p5k3ujud966w386s3c7v56nnyk2drkkn9scnn88evspmyhgpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qygxsm6lelvfda7qlg0tud9pfhduysy4vrexj65azqtdk4tr75j6xdspsgqqqqqqsevd9xp

There's also plenty of tools and scripts that automate the guide but I think wireguard is so simple and easy to configure that it's worth it to try to do it manually so that people can gain a basic understanding.

Your own VPN is actually just your VPS's provider VPN but with none of the advantages if sharing an IP address with other people.

Your VPS provider still can see all your traffic...

There is no way to use clearnet without one party knowing all your traffic.

nostr:naddr1qq8kwatfv3jj6amfwfjkwatpwfjqygxsm6lelvfda7qlg0tud9pfhduysy4vrexj65azqtdk4tr75j6xdspsgqqqw4rsg32ag8

Disagree. Your VPN has the anonset of 1. Hiding in the crowd in this case is preferable.

Here's my nostr-replaces-DNS type of wish: I wish the relay-list (nip65 and others) contained an npub identifier for each relay.

Becausw you id relays with npubs, they can advertise multiple websocket urls, including tor onion ones.

That way, if I pick a tor onion relay on a client with tor support, that same relay could be used in another client that did not connect through Tor, since it would just pick the "clearnet url" for that relay npub.

NIP65 capable clients would connect to the propper URL variant of my inbox/outbox relays. That way, I could use onion relays without ruining the gossip outbox model.

There's also potentially more upsides such as relay operators rotating URLs for maintenance or migration.

That's rough man, stay strong and chin up

So you rely on your chosen relays to not relay spam to your LN node? Seems reasonable

Uff you're right, that was a lost opportunity then... I can't watch the vid right now, but why using nostr DMs instead of using NWC-like events?

I also wonder about what are the spam defences of this. On a webserver you control, you can add ratelimits, etc. What's stopping someone from hitting 300 different relays asking for 300 different invoices from your LN node?

Is there a way to verify that a "monero zap" actually happened, or is it like LN zaps which are totally trust-based and can be easily spoofed?