Avatar
⛩oizen
dbc828cc8b33efa73a60ce27bfcf6e039fd602af289f7deb717d766aed78a663
Nostr npub for desktop devices of npub1m0yz3tvsa8cwheqhkqj96zr9kget8j8yda0vfmrah5c0dafj6xcq4l4az6

it oke for nostr servers to not increase storage size, ux wise

by terms of motivation at-the-moment, a note from x time ago not necessarily would be match for the motivations that are for today's notes. that's common at twitter, particularly with politicians and influence figures

a short-mid span of events might help keeping nostr lightweight and agile

had me on the first half, ngl, 🐸

jokes aside, seems like the axis problem turns around the question of solitude, and particularly since a whatever determination of having to do something about it, but yet, `that'd be like optional, bruh,' no matter the body and tastes... although yes, it'd be sad if someone who don't want to be alone struggles to find and feel human company, but even in so cases, there might be no miss on keep style and keep trying

Replying to Avatar fiatjaf

https://www.techdirt.com/2024/05/13/bluesky-is-building-the-decentralized-social-media-jack-dorsey-wants-even-if-he-doesnt-realize-it/

I have one criticism about this: why is he writing "nostr" in all lowercase? That makes it much harder to notice.

such a jealous claim ``he doesn't know better, he's ought to be with me instead of that nostr witch!'' lol

Hosting a node as base settlement; then running a web-server (either a vps or one self hosted too) which can run webpage's and lnbits' services pointed towards customer final screens (qr codes, although lnbits also has pos and some other useful stuff for businesses). The con is you ought to work lil extra to link devices and networks, the pro is that the web-server is what the client `sees' so you gain privacy by obfuscating your node as well as it's easier to give it maintenance without losing the front-end

Recuerda que siempre puedes darte una vuelta por slidestr o yakihonne con la misma llave de nostr para descubrir a más usuarios y su contenido 😉

Más notas en español

1. Terrible because being a single point of failure? If so I agree. But also then, mitigation could be either to be cautious about what that key is securing, or managing a set of keys for specific purposes (although fair enough, we'd be back to square 1 in regards of device engagement 😅 )

With 2. I can't agree more as well. As for that matter nostr is also friendly towards running self hosting setups; that being said, self hosting could also be prone to single point of failure risks, ie, `centralizing' servers at home prone to $5 wrench's 🤔

What Gigi describes seems to me well oriented towards lessening technology usage, at least as how I get your points... as I see it, a nsec, that is light to handle, transportable and even disposable, has the advantage of lessening the burden of logins, username-password accounts, craft and storage, etc, let's say, there's a engagement decrease (or at least alternative kind of interaction) with the devices...

comfy in nostrudel