Imagine if Bitcoin had been around 30 years ago and companies were bringing out multisig inheritance planning solutions on 3.25 inch floppy disks. You had 3 floppies, in 3 separate locations.
You died, a couple of weeks ago and now your solicitor and executor are trying to work out what to do with these ancient relics.
I think paper and pen or metal plate inheritance planning is more future proof. But as a short term solution (say 5 years), easy multisigs hardware products are going to help the adoption of Bitcoin.
If Iβm a chef and Iβve invented a secret sauce everybody raves about, but Iβm not prepared to sell it.
I invite you into my home, show you how to make it.
You go away, copy the sauce and sell it to become rich.
Have you stolen anything from me?
This is true π
Douglas Engelbart was great.
Craigs is at it again over on X
Hashing your key is not the same as sending it to somebody else π π π
When you don't know something, it's easy to not know a lot more as well.
https://trezor.io/learn/a/pay-to-public-key-hash-p2pkh

ACS Official Bitaxe Touchβ’
https://shop.advancedcryptoservices.com/product/bitaxe-touch
Or wrestle you to the ground

Welcome
If you'd like some help about this weird protocol we call NOSTR I wrote some guides here:
https://habla.news/u/mhardcastle@nostrplebs.com
I would start with this one here for some basic concepts:
https://habla.news/u/mhardcastle@nostrplebs.com/1724842277970
If you have questions, the tagΒ #asknostrΒ is a good place to start.
If you want to write a brief hello, use theΒ #introductionsΒ hashtag to allow people to find and welcome you.
Enjoy freedom speech and money.
I can lend you this if Google is letting you down π

Spandex π
Fun fact, Spandau Prison, from which Spandau Ballet were named, held Rudolf Hess until his death in 1987.
Our neighbour, General Robert Mezies, was one of the surgeons who performed the autopsy on his body after his death.
Lab diamonds are indistinguishable from organic ones, once cut.
Dried Porcini would be better, but there are no rules.
Dried porcini tend to intensify the flavour, but if you prefer a more delicate flavour, then fresh would be great.
What, did we have a conversation before?
Your words are familiar, but I can't remember the conversation.
Did we discuss Risotto?
If so, then Porcini are a good base, the dried ones which you then soak in boiling water for a half hour or so, then use the liquor to add flavour later.
Apart from that, any you fancy or that are in season.
I think you'll find the whitepaper uses British English spelling for words like "favour" and "grey".
π
ALICE detects the conversion of lead into gold at the LHC
https://www.home.cern/news/news/physics/alice-detects-conversion-lead-gold-lhc
Also gold doesn't need a constant supply of electricity to keep running.
In the same way you could lock up photos in a drawer 100 years ago and still look at them today, whereas the images you took on that digital camera around the turn of the century are lost forever because nobody can read floppy disks anymore.
I hate you.
You have virtue signalled your stupidity, while simultaneously boasting about the API you rewrote π
Probably
We went from 1MB physical blocks to 1.5MB physical blocks.
Taproot compressed the data such that we have 4MB virtual (compressed) block sizes
"Million Weight Units"

The world is weird sometimes π³

https://d-central.tech/the-debate-over-ocean-pools-op_return-size-limit/
Yours as well?
We are bonded by more than Bitcoin π«
Youβre a genius.
Right, youβre in charge of the Core vs Knots debate now π
You're fine π«
I just don't have the answers to life the Universe and everything.
Yes a friend told me that once.
We donβt speak much anymore π
Privacy?
Who the hell is discussing privacy right now π
My life is weird, this is also happening at the moment π
nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp6pmv65w6tfhcp73404xuxcqpg24f8rf2z86f3v824td22c9ymptqyv8wumn8ghj7enfd36x2u3wdehhxarj9emkjmn99uq32amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7tcqyzvcth0zuvunwh8mxpn7tve6eenk7vjmec6xp5yf320gzpzqp04yj9sfted
I can see why Lopp has ended up in his ivory tower.
You are building one for me right now π
No, I didn't ask that question, nor am I seeking to answer it.
In a complex argument it is always possible to derail a valid answer by changing the argument.
You just did that.
Your points are valid and you are raising them, but I am not, nor am I offering to answer them.
None of the above invalidates my point, which is still 100% true and correct.
Also, I sound like Jameson Lopp right now, which is disturbing me immensely π
Once again, we are not running to Knots, we are running away from Core.
And yes Dojo, blah blah blah π
Have a great day my friend, try amphetamines π
Yes it did answer the question.
It did answer it exactly and 100% and yes Ocean and DATUM are an answer.
Of course, by definition we don't want Ocean becoming a dominant mining pool, that would be very bad.
Don't call me Shirley π
Your first point is Cores argument, and it is valid.
All your points are valid.
Normally in a discussion, both sides are right. You just have to decide which right you want to be.
https://mikehardcastle.com/2016/09/08/sometimes-both-sides-are-right/
Slowly and with enormous difficulty.
The Core argument is that it's impossible and so we should mitigate spam and make it less destructive, which is a valid argument.
The Knots argument is it is possible to reduce by filtering, it is extremely unlikely that it can be eliminated, but we'll never know unless we try.
In terms of how we technically achieve this, this is a glimmer of hope:
nostr:note1j6n92hadyte3qd5j4nu6wga5zcxh097g5dv38qupg63ja35edeysm9gzdq







