The US and IMF have engineered a world order in which countries have completely reinvented their economies to export goods to the US so they can get USD to pay back their predatory loans. So the US complaining about the “trade deficit” that they nurtured and perpetuated makes little sense.
Bitcoin is also not backed by anything
Where are you getting any of this from? Roe vs Wade was originally determined on the basis of privacy. It had nothing to do with determining personhood.
And likewise it’s well established that non-citizens still receive due process. You’re literally just making up your own interpretation of the constitution.
The border is a line the government made up. It’s a victimless crime to cross it. You should stop trying to give so much power to the government.
Criminals get due process, that’s literally the point.
Yes they do. That has been well established by constitutional law
I find it hard to believe that you don’t see the problem in the subjectiveness in defining an “emergency” for the sake of revoking civil rights.
You’re making a great case for forced vaccinations
“it’s an emergency so fuck civil liberties and the bill of rights” was how the government justified 6102
But…. Like I want people to have bitcoin not the government
No it’s not good for bitcoin.
Probably more likely then the CIA working with CNN
Sounds awfully similar to many on here urging people not consent to searches when pulled over
END ALL WARS unless Trump starts it then war is good
False Equivalency. Time to catch up. One group was debanked for actual money laundering via NGOs while the other was debanked for excersising their first amendment rights. Its ironic that our great hero nostr:nprofile1qqsgydql3q4ka27d9wnlrmus4tvkrnc8ftc4h8h5fgyln54gl0a7dgspp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhx6mmnw3ezuur4vgkhjsen would repost this given his track record to stifle free speech on twitter.
But like how about we don’t use banking as a weapon. Let them get convicted of money laundering otherwise it’s just politicians getting to decide who to debank. So insane people defend this shit
What love to see these “facts” that prove a politician “cares” and isn’t just self interested
The structure of bureaucracy is such that that is not possible
A lot of people are going to be real surprised when they figure out that government still hates self custody and privacy.
Price means nothing if you’re tracked down and thrown in jail for using it
I’ve never seen any bitcoiner defend shitcoining rugpulls other than now. It’s astounding the amount of people that whiffed a shitcoin in some adjacent way and nearly got cancelled and yet this is excusable
But like….what if we want bitcoin to undermine banks and governments