Some of the profits from my labor go to global elites who barely know they own a piece of my employer. They're certainly not part of my local community. Wealth is being extracted from my region. I have no choice because my expertise requires that I work for an electric utility, which is a natural monopoly.
I'm forced into having the wealth I create extracted through dividends just like I'm forced to pay taxes. Capitalism and Communism are evil twins (and both are evil).
Neither Capitalism nor Communism have any claim of moral superiority because they are both authoritarian and domineering. They hate each other like two rival princes. They look like opposites only if you see authoritarianism as unavoidable.
Capitalism cannot work unless it is growing and dominating. It swallows up everything until it consumes the state. Once the delineation between capitalism and the state vanishes they the result is definitively fascism. Capitalism will always become the fascist state over time.
When and where was this book written? Maybe cheese was high value in that time and place.
He said "some" leftists. That's an order of magnitude more sophisticated than most Boomer inspired rhetoric.
Political nouns are not precise and the meanings vary. Want proof? Do an image search of "political compass" and observe the difference from one diagram to the next.
The libertarian left brings words like "Communalism", " Libertarian Municipalism" and "Anarchism" to my mind.
I personally see Communism and Fascism as unequivocally authoritarian, not libertarian.
Hierarchy bad; Anarchy good. Too simple?
What did they say that's retarded? I'm interested because I just listened to Greenwald's Podcast System Update #200 and quite enjoyed it.
The beauty in Anarchism is that Leftist Anarchists and Rightist Anarchists can agree on the means while disagreeing on the ends. What I means is I - with a proclivity toward leftist communalism - believe people will voluntarily organize themselves into small local communes and communities under Anarchism. It doesn't matter that a rightist individualists don't predict that because we both have the goal of Anarchism
nostr:npub1ajv7m32k0cpgzha32qszsh304qusjvwwmavus0ttktzldms4xzusuftppj
#Anarchy
Individuals are incomplete. It's true you can leave and reconfigure your family if it's dysfunctional and abusive, but most humans cannot and should not operate solo for extended periods. A young and strong individual can succeed alone but that individual is like a seed who must eventually build or join a family or community or some other type of group around themselves.
If the individual is prime then children should be on their own, the sick would be discarded and the old would be left to die without sharing their wisdom. The family is what is "prime".
Could pedophilia be the ultimate source of most or all our societal dysfunction? I dunno but it's possible.
This shows why cars are authoritarian and do not increase freedom and #anarchy
https://m.youtube.com/watch?si=rZwMVxwTgVGwTrKG&v=DpXqY_j1m1U&feature=youtu.be
nostr:npub1ajv7m32k0cpgzha32qszsh304qusjvwwmavus0ttktzldms4xzusuftppj how does capitalism as we know it today exist without the State and the military? How do you keep the Suez Canal and the Panama Canal open without a military? How do you protect shipping from pirates?
Same. I sometimes wonder what wild shit I'd be doing if I didn't have responsibilities. I think I'd try to start an Anarchist Commune and farm vegetables.
"As long as hierarchy persists, as long as domination organises humanity around a system of elites, the project of dominating nature will continue to exist and inevitably lead our planet to ecological extinction."
-Murray Bookchin
The domination of nature comes from the same place within us as the domination of fellow humans. My flavour of Anarchism rejects all domination as something resembling evil.
Is a family with Husband, Wife and three kids not a collective?
This thought is just more False Choice Fallacy Propaganda. I choose not to choose one of two polar extremes because I'm thoughtful. Economic individualism is bullshit that seems to only be pushed by those who are capable of defending themselves with violence.
Have you ever considered an Affinity Group?A large family, small community or a neighborhood are examples of an Affinity Group. All members of an Affinity Group know at least the reputation of all others in the group. This is natural to humanity.
Only a legitimate leader should actively work to diminish the need for his or her own leadership. Exactly like a successful teacher's goal should be to enlighten and empower the student thereby removing the need for the teacher in the end. Illegitimate leaders work to preserve their authority.
#anarchy
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=841x979&blurhash=%7BqMGeisqxat7oJWBadjF%7EqWUW%3BWBaeoKayayXnjYjajtkCofkCkC%25NofkCj%5BbHWVayjtxvWBWBafjZofj%5Dj%5Do%23a%7Ce.j%5BoffkbHfjbGj%5DoffPa%7Bayf6jZn%24ayj%5BjZf6j%5Bj%5BfkjYfkaya%7Cjta%7Bayay&x=b5164d84d8b99653347a22685c491276d24f355ff830314f758ddb1daf58f242

