Avatar
Alison Avery
f8f970a93f69f6a783e6aa2e00a97ec41ebe7672ec04131681bc2d0afe92b041
𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆: • Video and film producer • Videographer • Editor 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗹𝘆: • Nature and physics lover • Animal watcher • Idea explorer • Experimenter Email: alison@forrealz.video

Isn't it funny how cats know how to call dibs on the real estate in the very center of the bed just before you get in it? My cat, Alex, is just the same. lol

Warning. Don't use Intuit's TurboTax online to file your tax returns. Here's what I just encountered:

TurboTax was creepy in the way it tried to sneak in lots of tax return data harvesting for Intuit's own purposes and companies, including, but not limited to, their company Credit Karma.

1) Throughout the return creation process, many questions and prompts seemed like they were for the tax return, itself, but we're actually lead-ins to consenting to give your personal return data to Intuit and their affiliated companies.

2) In tandem with point 1, often they did not make opt-outs obvious, taking many secondary clicks before finding that "No Thanks" or "Skip" prompts were even available, leaving you wondering if the return process could move forward without being forced to consent.

3) Some of the consent attempts even used tricky "Review and Sign" language on buttons, similar to what you might see when at the point of reviewing and signing your return, as confusing clickbait.

These deceptive practices happened at many points of interaction throughout the return, from the very beginning to the very end.

Just a warning for anyone else who will be filing taxes. I definitely won't be using or recommending this service again.

Please repost if you feel this would be important for anyone who follows you to know.

#nostr #grownostr #bitcoin #taxes #plebchain #plebs #privacy #truth or lack thereof #don'ttrustverify

What a brilliant Emerson quote, and what an apt metaphor. I'd not read or heard this one before.

Lately, I've been internally referring to 95-97% of all media content as the "seed oils" of communication.

If you value your powers of observation and logical thought, it's simply best not ingest it.

#nostr #grownostr #seedoils #observation #mentalhealth #rationalthinking

Not yet, but I just checked out your link. Thanks!

#SilentSunday #trees #flowers #nature #photography

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

As both a tahini lover and seed oil disrespectooor, this is a question I've thought about more than I care to admit.

imo, the tentative answer is somewhere in the middle. With the caveat that I'm not a molecular biologist and I could change my view.

Some of the worst aspects of seed oils in modern processed foods are that they are produced with extremely high heat in an industrial process that damages them, they literally turn rancid, and then various de-odorizing chemicals are used to mask that. There's a million red flags there. And they're in everything. I went down this research rabbit hole like 15 years ago, and then tested various diets on my own body with blood results and such.

Tahini is a more traditional food, able to be made with low-tech and lower-heat methods. Blended up sesame seeds is likely not the worst thing to eat on occasion.

It's kind of like how when people who are too sensitive to eat American bread go to Europe and can eat their bread without obvious consequences. Their breads are lot less acutely bad. They're probably nowhere near an "optimal performance" diet, but there's some damage control there. Same thing for like "Einkorn wheat" and stuff.

I went through a big ketogenic phase, and then seasonal ketogenic, etc. That's kind of where I'm at now: seasonal. I eat tahini only when in Egypt. It's so good, including with Egyptian bread which I otherwise try to minimize, and rather than having all our family meals have to revolve around me, I just adapt to the local diet, eat the parts I love, and then when I want to be more strict, I do it on my own time.

My rule for diets is to optimize them up until they cause stress. Once they cause stress, they start offsetting the good aspects.

And for me, dipping some Egyptian bread into some Egyptian tahini, is worth it on occasion.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpckv7l8jqspl8u4y54dn9rcduwlrs4v2040nxce0m2h0cunvrj8tqqsvnescwwketf8uqvcl8kn3gp0cn3fk83dftut33hdq3cmpjjngjlq9lvs8j

I appreciate this answer. Residing primarily in the US (for now), I have been on a solid ketogenic diet for the past year. In the last 6 months, I've been following research on how the body and brain process seed oils, beyond just the issues of seed oil industrial production. It seems there's an issue with quantity (our early ancestors would never have ingested the amounts of oil from seeds, even in one sitting, that we currently commonly consume) and an issue with the type of long chain fatty acid that makes up seed oils (it takes a lot of inefficient work for cells to break it down for energy, particularly in the brain, and leaving the high amounts of oxidative stress.) But I'm not sure if tahini strictly falls into this category. For myself, I'll look into it.

Here's an interesting interview that includes a discussion on this research by Dr. Georgia Ede. Seed oil discussion begins at 10:05, and the specifics on oxidative stress begin at 12:45. I think the entire segment on seed oils is 5 minutes in total:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=koh9WpXZNOg

Found this in a cool local kitty-cat shop today, and I'm pretty darn sure I have to get it.

Rosie the Riveter has met her match.

#catstr #cats #animals #artstr #art #grownostr

You really understood the essence of my question. I appreciate that. I, too, believe linguistic integrity to be very important, although, as you allude to, it is often difficult to achieve.

I like your point about trying to maintain integrity while also not entirely abandoning aspirational terminology because it's not perfect. This is something I hadn't considered, and your reply clearly articulates the reasons why this might be so. I will keep this in mind.

Further, you mentioned "all linguistic models reduce complexity—the art is to do so without self-deception." I absolutely agree. And, for me, it is an art that takes lots of conscious practice.

Again, thank you for your ideas.

Lastly, as a writer, I greatly appreciate your awareness and use of the M-dash (—). 🤓😉

Not sure if it is the "exact opposite", but it is my additional understanding from other resources I've looked at as well as my personal experience, which is why I said "adding to" his definition. I guess it would agree with the Merriam-Webster definition (shown below) in the sense of no qualitatively important action taking place.

Merriam-Webster:

"the act or practice of conspicuously displaying one's awareness of and attentiveness to political issues, matters of social and racial justice, etc., especially instead of taking effective action"

Greetings, Alison,

Nice to encounter you for the first time today.🙏🏻😁

I fear you are laboring under an all too common and very unfortunate misconception about the free market.

nostr:nprofile1qqszxyp33y6kea7ghsymhz6rrlp7w859tqkg7a2mnmskqgpunsv7gqcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwvehh2mn5v95kutnxd5mgakvh alluded to your confusion by offering many examples; I'll try to articulate the problem I perceive in your question.

You seem to believe that all "profit" of necessity requires an imbalance, a very one-sided relationship between a pair of participating parties in a transaction. Not much could be further from the truth...

Whenever human ingenuity is applied to the universe in the service of human needs--whether through design and implementation of a useful physical device like a car, or the thoughtful arrangement of ideas like a recipe for a tasty meal or a knot-tying manual--VALUE is created that can be infinitely multiplied by replication. The work and effort is expended ONCE, the value is MULTIPLIED and accrues to EVERYONE who uses the tangible result of the idea.

I will give you one personal example:

Conventional antibiotics have become ineffective in cases of MRSA (when pathogens develop resistance, becoming "superbugs"). Colloidal silver is a safe, effective, and superior solution to this problem, but making high quality colloidal silver is tricky.

I invented a device that produces excellent CS completely automatically:

https://SILVERengines.com

Everyone who purchases one of my devices receives FAR MORE VALUE than the price of the device, because they would otherwise have to repeatedly and cumulatively spend far more over time to purchase the quality CS ready-made.😃

V4V is very real; both sides of the transaction benefit and are satisfied; it is most definitely NOT "virtue signaling."

Please note also that V4V can be by advance agreement (most common up until now, with buyers and sellers), or the offerer can simply voluntarily "put value out there for FREE," as we see in the Free and Open Source Software movement; in which case, if users value the product, they often will, entirely voluntarily and out of gratitude send value to the creator.

This is happening and will only increase because of the wonderful gifts that bitcoin, lightning, nostr, and zaps are; true FREEDOM TECHNOLOGY gifted to humanity by superhero developers who are well deserving of our micropayment, tangible gratitude expression in zaps for the continually expanding value of their proof of work that we all now benefit from on a daily basis.

Also, you mentioned nostr:npub1yvgrrzf4dnmu30qfhw95x87ruu0g2kpv3a64h8hpvqsre8qeuspsgd6pv9 left a reply. I'm not seeing it in the Primal app, and Amethyst won't open for me since I recently updated. Would love to know what he said.

Greetings, Alison,

Nice to encounter you for the first time today.🙏🏻😁

I fear you are laboring under an all too common and very unfortunate misconception about the free market.

nostr:nprofile1qqszxyp33y6kea7ghsymhz6rrlp7w859tqkg7a2mnmskqgpunsv7gqcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwvehh2mn5v95kutnxd5mgakvh alluded to your confusion by offering many examples; I'll try to articulate the problem I perceive in your question.

You seem to believe that all "profit" of necessity requires an imbalance, a very one-sided relationship between a pair of participating parties in a transaction. Not much could be further from the truth...

Whenever human ingenuity is applied to the universe in the service of human needs--whether through design and implementation of a useful physical device like a car, or the thoughtful arrangement of ideas like a recipe for a tasty meal or a knot-tying manual--VALUE is created that can be infinitely multiplied by replication. The work and effort is expended ONCE, the value is MULTIPLIED and accrues to EVERYONE who uses the tangible result of the idea.

I will give you one personal example:

Conventional antibiotics have become ineffective in cases of MRSA (when pathogens develop resistance, becoming "superbugs"). Colloidal silver is a safe, effective, and superior solution to this problem, but making high quality colloidal silver is tricky.

I invented a device that produces excellent CS completely automatically:

https://SILVERengines.com

Everyone who purchases one of my devices receives FAR MORE VALUE than the price of the device, because they would otherwise have to repeatedly and cumulatively spend far more over time to purchase the quality CS ready-made.😃

V4V is very real; both sides of the transaction benefit and are satisfied; it is most definitely NOT "virtue signaling."

Please note also that V4V can be by advance agreement (most common up until now, with buyers and sellers), or the offerer can simply voluntarily "put value out there for FREE," as we see in the Free and Open Source Software movement; in which case, if users value the product, they often will, entirely voluntarily and out of gratitude send value to the creator.

This is happening and will only increase because of the wonderful gifts that bitcoin, lightning, nostr, and zaps are; true FREEDOM TECHNOLOGY gifted to humanity by superhero developers who are well deserving of our micropayment, tangible gratitude expression in zaps for the continually expanding value of their proof of work that we all now benefit from on a daily basis.

I appreciate your time and your thorough reply. It sounds like, as an inventor, you've created a way for people to access MRSA treatment that saves them both their time and monetary resources. It must feel good putting an invention like that out into the universe.

Adding to the definition and resource that nostr:npub1cxp3l03x20mkzezzr4takm8w8zuva7xwvacmcewp97z58hjt8xls3mexlq provided, my personal understanding has been it can be a repeated phrase or "slogan" that makes it sound like something of virtue is taking place when nothing particularly substantive or qualitatively different is actually happening.

Adding to the definition and resource nostr:npub1cxp3l03x20mkzezzr4takm8w8zuva7xwvacmcewp97z58hjt8xls3mexlq provided, my personal understanding has been it can be a repeated phrase or "slogan" that makes it sound like something of virtue is taking place when nothing particularly substantive or qualitatively different is actually happening.

Dear Nostr,

I ask this question not as a judge of people who embrace the term "value for value" exchange—no chosen turns of phrase will ever perfectly represent reality. I ask because I often observe how the shorthand we use in language, even if created to express shared ideas more concisely, can come also, in time, to represent moral posturing. Also, the question is not intended as a denigration of the idea of profiting.

My experience in many domains is that people and groups are rarely, if ever, trying to execute value for value (or win-win) exchanges. If you're trying to "profit", you're explicitly trying to gain more in energy and resources than you give away in energy and resources, even if this difference is come by indirectly (i.e. costs experienced by "someones" or "somethings" unknown to you in the entire chain of resources.)

This idea of "profit" seems similar to how wild animals and organisms use some kind of advantage they have over other animals and organisms, which, in turn, leads to their ongoing survival in the wild.

If the above are accurate, are terms like "value-for-value" and "win-win" closer to virtue signaling than accurate descriptions for what is taking place? Would a terms like "direct exchange" or "straight trade" be more honest and correct?

All thoughtful responses are appreciated, regardless of length.

Sincerely,

Alison

#bitcoin #nostr #asknostr #grownostr #plebchain #v4v #btc #bitcoiners #psychology #nosterplebs #finance