Verbiage is far less important than meaning, and policing descriptive terms has no transformative effect on reality.

If you find yourself playing word games all the time you’re probably engaging in some form of self denial.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It’s a socialist and communist tactic

It is but it’s also a sort of brain worm that erodes people’s ability to engage substantively with reality.

We’re saying the same thing 😂

I’m saying I see conservatives do it too. Though not quite as much.

Word games are literally my job, ngmi I guess.

Wouldn’t a lawyer be the opposite? Purposely using exact wording so there is zero ambiguity? Unless it’s at a federal level where you’re trying to impose laws as a catch-all for anything they don’t like.

Litigators are the opposite of transactional lawyers. I’m a litigator, which means I have to find cases to convince a judge a dog is a cat sometimes.

A lot of conservatives are socialists imo. A lot of what Trump and is doing, and proposing right now, are socialist ideas.

I’ve decided all forms of government are nascent socialist tyrannies just looking to root.

Cash vs cache.

One is "a place to store valuable things" (weapons, gold, whatever) and the other is quite literally the opposite thing, "a place that loses whatever value you put into it"

We already had the words "money" and "dollar"; bastardizing the word cache into cash was a (IMO completely unnecessary) bonus. The result is easy: no one knows how to value anything for their entire life

I know what you mean or I got you. Save time, make connections.

Reality is subjective

It’s not

Everything in the universe is either a potato or not a potato. That’s a fact jack.

True, but you can only know the potato through experience, which is subjective. The same potato could be highly valued or totally disposable based on how hungry or poor you are.

what has more objective value, potato or ounce of gold?

am I alone and hungry, or able to trade?

the value becomes subjective

I can point you to Keonnes dilemma with the Mackerel standard , as an example. And they still dont eat them.

https://www.therage.co/letter-2-keonne-rodriguez/

eat the chicken, spend the mackerel, Gresham's law in action

Sure but it’s still a potato. Things either are or are not.

We come to these conclusions using input processed through faulty hardware. When you say "potato", the neurons in your jar brain can only draw from your subjective experience of what a potato is. When someone else hears you say "potato", they can't possibly be experiencing the same platonic form of a potato as your brain. You are both experiencing different potatos.

potato chimeras exist, jus sayin

If the base is potato it’s potato lol

Mr Potato Head is both a potato and not a potato

He’s a potato

On second thought…he’s neither a potato nor is he not a potato

Most intellectually stimulating post ⭕️ day….so far!!!🤔🤯😂🌅

….i will henceforth identify as a potato 🧐🫡

…oops….one question 😳…which bathroom should I use?😖

Proof of potato

There once was a life with no script,

No label, no tag, no pre-written quip.

One called it a prison,

One called it art,

Same days—just a different grip.

Reality just is, our understanding of reality is subjective and some of the subjective understandings of reality are more wrong than others

Being a lawyer...

Word salad, order UP! Say less, mean more?

Couldn’t agree more. Playing semantic games doesn’t fix reality, it just delays facing it.