To me it sounds like they are going to “borrow funds” based on peoples savings in the banks. Using private savings as the collateral for the new funds.

A kind of reverse borrowing. The nations will borrow against past labour vs borrowing against future output.

Sounds like a fracrional reserve loan. So businesse as usual it seems!

Always is. Just like how the population was made to feel guilty, ashamed, if they didn’t get vaccinated because they were putting others at “risk”. Which we all now know was one big LIE

Agreed. To a large degree they do this already?

Got the source on deets for this? They didn’t link to anything.

Deep research from ChatGPT:

European Commission’s Savings and Investments Union: How Contributions Work

The European Commission’s Savings and Investments Union (SIU) is a strategy to channel more household savings into productive investments. Crucially, it does not compel anyone to hand over their money or have banks automatically siphon funds from personal accounts. Instead, the SIU focuses on voluntary participation through new savings and investment products, supported by incentives and convenient options  . In other words, individuals won’t see their bank redirect deposits into an EU fund by default – you either choose to contribute or are enrolled with the option to opt out.

Voluntary Contributions, Not Automatic Deductions

• Opt-In Investment Products: The Commission’s plan is to “promote low-cost saving and investment products at EU level for retail investors” . This means creating easy, attractive ways for people to invest if they actively choose. For example, a person might open a new EU-wide savings/investment account or buy into a fund – but only if they opt in. There is no rule forcing you to transfer money; it’s about offering better opportunities and incentives for those who want to invest .

• No Automatic Bank Redirects: Banks will not automatically divert your existing savings into an SIU fund without your consent. The initiative aims to “increase returns on savings” by giving citizens more investment options , but any movement of your money would require your involvement. In practice, contributions would happen via voluntary actions – for instance, setting up a recurring transfer into an investment fund or pension. Even industry proposals for the SIU emphasize “programmed monthly contributions” and default investment options as low-barrier solutions, but “without compromising” individuals’ freedom of choice . In short, nothing will be taken from your account or “redirected” by your bank unless you sign up for it.

• Dedicated Funds Are Voluntary: If the SIU leads to creation of any “dedicated” EU savings or investment fund, contributing to it would be entirely voluntary. The Commission’s approach is to empower citizens to invest, not to mandate contributions. For example, stakeholders have floated ideas like a European Savings and Investment Account or an EU-wide retirement plan, but these would function like optional accounts individuals can deposit into (potentially with tax breaks or other incentives), not a government-imposed levy  . The goal is to encourage more people to invest by making it easy and beneficial, rather than to require automatic payments.

Auto-Enrolment vs. Opt-In Participation

While participation in SIU-related products is fundamentally opt-in, EU policymakers are considering auto-enrolment mechanisms in certain contexts – especially for retirement savings – as a way to boost participation. Auto-enrolment means you are signed up by default but can choose to opt out. Importantly, auto-enrolment is not the same as a compulsory deduction:

• Auto-Enrolment in Pensions: The Commission has signaled support for automatic enrollment in workplace pension schemes (similar to the UK’s system) as a best practice to get more people saving for retirement  . In an auto-enrolment system, contributions (e.g. via payroll deduction) start automatically when you get a job, unless you actively opt out. This approach is “widely recognized as one of the most effective mechanisms to boost pension participation” and is “actively promoted by the European Union” . Even so, it remains voluntary in outcome – every individual retains the right to opt out or stop contributions at any time . The Commission plans to recommend auto-enrolment for pensions by Q3 2025 (along with improving personal pension products like the PEPP) to encourage saving, not to force anyone’s hand .

• Freedom to Opt Out: In countries that use auto-enrolment, people can leave the scheme whenever they want. As one analysis notes, “in Member States with automatic enrollment schemes, individuals may opt out at will” . This principle would apply to any EU-endorsed auto-enrolment under the SIU. So if, for example, your employer enrolls you in a new EU-wide savings plan by default, you would have the clear ability to say “no thanks” and stop those contributions. The choice ultimately remains with the individual, ensuring participation is not truly automatic without consent.

Bottom Line: Participation is Opt-In or Opt-Out, Not Mandatory

Official EU communications and policy proposals confirm that the SIU will rely on voluntary participation, aided by smart defaults and incentives – never automatic confiscation of savings. The Commission’s own description highlights giving everyone “the right opportunity” to invest under the SIU, implying an enabling role rather than an obligatory one . There is no requirement for individuals to manually transfer money into a fund unless they decide to participate. Likewise, financial institutions won’t be automatically deducting money for an SIU fund without your agreement.

In practice, if the SIU leads to new EU-backed savings products, you will likely see opt-in accounts or plans offered by banks, insurers, or employers. You might be invited or default-enrolled to contribute, but you will always have the option not to. Any contribution – whether a one-time transfer or a monthly deposit – will happen because you chose to join the scheme (or chose not to opt out). The overarching aim is to *“turn savers…into investors” by making it easier and more rewarding, not by any mandate .

In summary, participation in the Savings and Investments Union initiative is voluntary and driven by individual choice. You won’t be enrolled in a dedicated fund unless you opt in (actively or by not opting out), and contributions will be made by you or on your behalf with your consent, not automatically taken by your bank. The SIU’s role is to set up the framework and incentives so that if you do want to invest some of your savings, it’s simple and beneficial to do so   – but the decision remains yours.

Sources:

• European Commission – Work Programme 2025 (Competitiveness): Announcement of an SIU strategy to promote low-cost savings/investment products for citizens .

• Deutsche Börse (industry proposal) – Emphasizes voluntary features (e.g. monthly contributions and auto-enrolment options as nudges) “without compromising…self-discretion” of savers .

• Investment Company Institute (ICI) – Notes that in auto-enrolment schemes individuals retain the right to opt out at any time; auto-enroll is a nudge, not a mandate .

• PensionsEurope – Highlights that auto-enrolment (with opt-outs) is encouraged by the EU to increase participation in pensions, whereas purely voluntary (opt-in) systems often see low uptake . This illustrates the opt-in/opt-out approach the SIU is expected to take, rather than any automatic deductions.

Sources:

• European Commission – Work Programme 2025 (Competitiveness): Announcement of an SIU strategy to promote low-cost savings/investment products for citizens .

• Deutsche Börse (industry proposal) – Emphasizes voluntary features (e.g. monthly contributions and auto-enrolment options as nudges) “without compromising…self-discretion” of savers .

• Investment Company Institute (ICI) – Notes that in auto-enrolment schemes individuals retain the right to opt out at any time; auto-enroll is a nudge, not a mandate .

• PensionsEurope – Highlights that auto-enrolment (with opt-outs) is encouraged by the EU to increase participation in pensions, whereas purely voluntary (opt-in) systems often see low uptake . This illustrates the opt-in/opt-out approach the SIU is expected to take, rather than any automatic deductions.

Yes, I read up on it and my post is completely wrong. Thanks for fact checking me!

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2020:590:FIN

a lot of BS political bullshit fluff (if this is the same as they were referring to in the tweet)… besides adding even more friction in order to reduce friction (politicians playing engineers) they want to encourage people to invest in EU stock instead of Nvidia… or something. or am i missing something?

link?

https://www.dai.de/fileadmin/user_upload/250305_Position_Pap er_SIU_Aktieninstitut_final.pdf

Don’t trust, verify. 😊

While true that they are terrible capital allocators, you cannot deny the fact that they are presently in control of all tax, which includes everything from capital gains tax rates to deductions and property taxes etc. Wheather we like that or not is irrelevant, it is a fact. The ”personal property rights” you claim exist are already severely limited as it is. This is why it is quite a leap to call these moves dystopian — it is more an issue of working within already existing structures by re-evaluating tax rates and adapting incentives to nudge investments in other directions.