The "gun control" people speak of is just the violent monopolization of guns by political parasites. It increases the power disparity between govt agents & citizens, as well as expanding the power disparity between criminals & their law abiding victims. The only people who support such things are people who identify more with criminals & psychopathic control freaks than with honest people who just want to protect themselves & their loved ones.
But also gun control is statistically proven to reduce, I dunno, your kids getting shot in the face
No, it absolutely is not. If you remove the cities with gun control from US stats, it is one of the safest countries in the world. The safest college campuses in the US allow people to be armed, the most dangerous ones don't. The overwhelming majority of gun violence happens in places where victims have been disarmed by the govt.
How did this adam troll find you?
You guys are wild. I hope you have a good weekend and don't freak out about communism.
Well we respectfully disagree. I dispute your statistics, they are absurd. And I would argue they are very much incorrect. Just look at how many homicides are instigated using firearms in the US vs anywhere in Europe.
Look at the per capita numbers. The US is huge compared to "anywhere in Europe." The people who present numbers that way are purposely trying to mislead you. They make emotional appeals & work hard to skew numbers & perceptions because they want people to willingly accept their own enslavement
Sure, and homicides have nothing to do with domestic social issues and everything to do with a certain hunk of blued steel.
you seem to lack basic reading comprehension skills. everything people are telling you is going out the other ear.
you speak of "statistics" but never present any. some of us have been looking at these statistics for decades. if you discount gun free zones and nonwhites america is the safest country on earth.
white legal gun owners are the safest group of people to be around with - this is the real statistic, not the imaginary ones which you never quote because they don't exist.
please just shut your fucking mouth and stop embarrassing yourself.
This is a parody account, right?
"never quote"? I just said Europe has fewer guns and the kids don't go to school fearing mass shootings. There's your statistics. Look it up
if you are afraid it's because you're a coward and nobody can really help you with that. before soy variety of humans like you were invented people could face certain death without fear. today they can't face 0.01% chance of death despite the fact we're all going to die someday. honestly if life is so scary you should just kill yourself - why suffer ? i never knew anybody afraid of mass shootings but that's because i don't hang out with pussies like you.
as for school shootings we already explained this to you 10 times - schools are gun-free zones.
are you retarded by any chance ? you seem awfully slow.
gun violence in America falls into 3 categories:
1 - mass shootings ( schools, malls and other GUN-FREE zones )
2 - gang violence ( nonwhites using illegal guns )
3 - self defense shootings ( by legally carrying whites )
this is the REAL statistics
violence is caused by gun free zones, nonwhites and illegals and is prevented by legally carrying whites
stop watching MSNBC, listening to Jews and chugging Soy and maybe you can stop being a joke some day.
I don't think the racial lines are quite that clear. I know stupid angry white trash people who do horrible shit too. But there is definitely a cultural divide with some racial correlation.
Culture matters, not race.
Proof being that angry white commies do all sorts of violent & destructive shit too. The rise of socialist or communist ideology is a solid measure of cultural corruption or degredation regardless of race.
you got this idea from Ben Shapiro, who is a Jew ...
just like the Bolsheviks in Russia were Jews ...
it's almost like Shapiro is covering for his Hebrew Tribe here ...
if Jews are white then why is it called anti-semitism and not anti-whiteism ? it seems the Jews consider themselves Semitic, rather than Caucasian ...
but they always frame white people for their crimes ...
just like Trans-Atlantic slave trade was run by Jews but now White People have to pay reparations for it even though only 4% of American Whites owned slaves but MOST American Jews did and slave markets closed for Jewish holidays ...
not everything is about race, but many things are about TRIBE.
If the right to bear arms is surrendered by people like you, your kids might wish you were shot in the face.
Adam troll? I'm a human being, you can speak to me
My question still stands, why do you want to help criminals terrorize people by demanding that the police disarm all potential victims?
Excuse.me, what? Please explain
You saying youre a human being, and your negligence of the presented argument, only leads me to believe youre less than a troll and indeed are a bot.
Lol
What chance does someone who is disabled have in a conflict with a strong able bodied attacker?
What chance does a young girl living or walking alone on campus have against a bigger stronger man?
In most situations the stronger person will win. Except when guns are involved. Guns are equalizers. A young girl who is all alone with her gun or a person in a wheelchair with a gun can be just as deadly as any man with a gun. Beyond having the ability to aim & pull the trigger, muscles don't matter.
What people like you support is disarming the weak. It appears (to any sane person) that you prefer to help the criminals. You want people to be terrorized & raped & stolen from.
Criminals don't obey laws. Any idiot can see that. And there are many ways to illegally acquire a gun. It's also quite easy to 3d print them or to make one from materials readily available at any hardware store.
When you support a law that disarms people, you are creating an environment in which only criminals have guns. And good people are in much weaker positions against attackers of all kinds. People who advocate "gun control" are making the world a scarier & more dangerous place for good people.
you only need to look at rape epidemic in Europe where they disarmed the population then imported millions of young African men who came alone ( didn't bring their women ), can't get a date because they're broke, so they just rape White European women. the police do nothing because they are afraid of being labeled racist.
I knew a wheelchair bound woman that couldn't handle much firearm, but her .22LR pistol was far superior to being a victim.
Guns to physical violence is nostr to publishing speech and bitcoin is to financial exclusivity (banks). The three are all anti-tyranny freedom tech.
Perhaps we shouldn't have people attacking disabled people in the first place (an incredibly tiny number and insignificant reference point that demonstrates your lack of standing)
So women & disabled people are insignificant... sure, that's a great way to deal with your cognitive dissonance
I guess if rape & murder & theft are wrong we should just stop those things by making them illegal 🤔
I can make up scenarios too! What if a giraffe with an Uzi duck taped to him breaks into a daycare center for left handed children with communist leanings? How do we stop the giraffes? Why won't anyone think of the communist left handed infants?
So there are no disabled people in the world?
And there are no women living alone, walking to their cars alone, men aren't physically stronger, & criminals don't break gun laws?
I wouldn’t bother at this point.
Software dev in presumably the nice part of Philly (where the policies voted for don’t affect them). Watching John Wick is provably the closest this guy has been to a firearm.
Self defense is a goofy martial arts class and if we all just vote harder and get the right autocrats in we’ll usher in a utopia.
The blatant refusal to think is just astonishing sometimes.
No one is that stupid.
Criminals in Europe have access to guns. There are strict gun laws. There are NOT daily mass shootings. My point is simply that reducing the number of guns will affect the third statement. Nobody is advocating for helping criminals.
US doesn't have daily mass shootings either, and has a larger population than Europe
*European countries, not Europe as a whole obviously
They are pulling numbers from a place that will literally count a man defending his home from criminals as a mass shooting. The efforts to spread lies & twist numbers are amazing.
Yeah, because a lunatic that would shoot your kids in the face would also be a law abiding citizen, and would give up on doing so because gun control.
haha ! so that's why 90% of gun crime happens in gun-free zones, right ?
Nobody needs an assault rifle in their house. Nobody.
My rifle won't hurt you unless you come try to take it, or anything else I own.
Why do you want to help criminals, & to make it safer for them to steal from & threaten & terrorize good people?
Nobody needs to tell me what I need. Nobody.
Eryn. Part of being a functioning member of society is adhering to mutually accepted boundaries and rules. You can't send your kids out to work in coal mines because we all agreed that was cruel and unnecessary.
People like you don't want to help maintain society though, you want to destroy society by aiding violent anti-social elements & make it illegal for good people to protect themselves.
If you still think that the nonsense you’re spouting is mutually accepted then I don’t know what to tell you.
Did we all agree on that? 🤔
Well, the lowest common denominator mob rule of democracy works better when the people that the mob wants to loot are all disarmed. And he supports the looters, so...
If we want to play the appeal to authority “rules and boundaries” game, I believe there is a law stating that US citizens have the right to firearms. Why is that being challenged? Weren’t mutually agreed upon rules being upheld here?
…or that’s just a LARP for “my rules my boundaries” nanny state bs?
You *dont* send yout kids to work in the coal mines, as society became rich, people sent their kids to school instead, laws about child labor didnt come for decades after kids left the workforce.
How about a mutually accepted boundary that I have my house and you have yours, I dont tell you how to live and you dont tell me how to live? See, anything else REQUIRES violence, so you arent saying "mutually agree", you are saying "do what I say ot else".
Lol ok mate. Don't.invite me to dinner though, your place sounds awful.
You dont know anything about "my place", and you are trying to deflect from the absurdity obvious in your statements when tested. Things like minimum wage, child labor laws, and rent control have all been proven as total bullshit, and its intellectually dishonest to use them in your arguements. Its fine if you dont want to come for dinner, see I wont force you, nor will I force myself upon you, thats called morality, something you should try out rather than jumping to conclusions abouy how great your utopia would be if "everyone just agreed" to do whatever you intend to force them into.
Wow
Nobody needs a dumbass on nostr telling them what they need in their house, but here you are doing just that
That’s right!
When you’re in the house, it’s better to have a sawed off shotgun for close combat fighting.
ain’t no one need a 556 going through the drywall
In a single sentence you’re implying the threat of violence against peaceful people while simultaneously claiming that those same people have no need of effective instruments of defense.
Is this a joke? Are you trolling?
If not, please spend a moment of thought on what kind of assault you’re threatening millions of families with.
anybody that tells me what i don't need has too many teeth in their smile.
Yeah the label is a psyop
What is the best label to refer to the behavior in which authority figures seek to restrict or eliminate the right to armed self-defense?
Disarmament
Gun rights infringement
Gun rights restrictions
Disempowerment
Making citizens helpless
communism
True
but nonspecific for normies and thanks to leftist education/culture lacks emotional valence West of the Baltic
Noun, American: Anything that sounds like other people impinging my rights or costing me money, regardless of any facts or evidence.
Spoken like a true westerner who has never lived under communism.
Fair, although I have lived under what most Americans would call socialism
Almost everyone has been living under socialism, except maybe for the mentally ill who still think "it hasn't AKSHUALLY been tried yet."
Things that have increased dramatically or only existed in the past 200 years:
Proactive policing
Large, centralized nation-States (really since Westphalia, peak around WW2 and declining since)
Mass incarceration
Drug prohibition
Fiat currency
You might complain that socialism is when the government owns the means of production, but ownership means control
🤔
