what they did to samurai was entirely legal.
and it was samurai's legal ignorance that got them into that position.
its ALWAYS like that - what they are doing is entirely LEGAL because the population is stupid and wont read what the law says - if you dint know what the law says your defense is retarded and misplaced.
Samurai shouldn't have gone around bragging about dunking on them to get their wrath. This proves, it doesn't matter what the law states, currently we live in a system of might over right.
You can go live outside this system though, but you will still have to deal with Mafia/bandits who want to take from you.
ok im done with your fantasy scenarios... go read or go to hell...
peace.
My focus is on finding out what we are and where we are. These are more pressing problems IMO.
yeah you do seem a bit lost...
i might suggest that the finding is in the doing and discovering "where" is in the actual looking - stuff that i am asking you to do...
but you do you or whatever it is that sun-tzu having been bastardized by some libertarian tech idolizing nigger said
I've never had such mental clarity until now. I am only lost in so far as the military stops us from exploring the realm and finding out where the fuck we are.
Sun Tzu was right though or? 
Awareness is a weapon.
Privacy is a weapon.
Anonymity is a weapon.
Self-cuatody is a weapon.
He is the one every Bitcoiners should read since a lot of adversarial thinking got lost in the NGU mind fuck.
I am so glad that most OGs reunited under Monero where the true fight between state and freedom has been taken place for the last 7 years. Before that they were fighting against BTC.
Bitcoiners believe the perception that a high fiat price means something in this war. Wake up, you've beend duped. Nobody in the controlled world uses BTC. Price follows adoption on the ground not Saylorism and Trump and dumps.
Why are we early Bitcoiners spending so much time here talking to you about Monero.
Because we know awareness is a weapon and Bitcoiners are the most open to join the fight to bring down the state.
Some good points, those are things I am focusing on. Will stack some monero as we are fighting the same cause.
βPrice follows adoptionβ
The free market likes Bitcoin more
Mahood. There is NO free market. What you call the free market is the licensed and controlled white market that pushes fiat numbers baround as if hey mattered.
The free market is the black, the grey (darkn net) market which is ruled by cash and digital cash (Monero). Its prices are as fake as any other thing. Just not the way you think. One gets pumped and the other suppressed.
Fine then call it βthe market.β Bitcoin was doing just fine in terms of price appreciation before government gave bitcoin its blessings. You can also call it purchasing power growth if you donβt want to think in terms of fiat. Still doing better. Idc if the government likes it or doesnβt like it. Itβs a tool that helps my life and I will use it. If the government said steak and eggs are good for you, Iβm not gonna stop eating it.
BTC rose to 20k in 2017 in fiat bucks.
Since then its stagnating. M2 more than doubled, which means 120k in 2025 equals something like 50k in 2017.
We are past the big gains if you are in for that. They tamed it. CBOE started to offer futures late 2017. Since then Bitcoin is under their control.
Retail is steered by the media they control. Outside of manufactured hype nobody can move the markets snumorecagsinst their will.
what happens to mstr in this scenario?
Youβre nitpicking stats gtfo lol also they canβt completely control these markets. Why the fuck would they pump a decentralized currency that threatens the fiat system? Iβm a big conspiracy guy but this is irrational. These people have some influence but they canβt control the world to this level.
Yes. Itβs always been like this.
We will always have to pay homage or bow down to someone bigger, stronger than us. It can be worse in other places.
Donβt say always. You can find ways to avoid these things. Defense is better than revenge. Avoidance is better than defense. Things can and will change for the better imo.
Agree. You can certainly avoid and reduce the impact with some smart moves. Trying fo take on the system is a crazy move, even if you have the law behind you. LOL.
you guys have an utterly retarded and female take on this...
you will be chased down and forced whether in this life or the next...
now, back to your recliner.
The law isnβt a real thing. Itβs a social construct. You cannot prove that laws exist in physical reality. Itβs like the concept of countries and states. These things cannot be identified using any of the human senses: sight, touch, taste, smell, hearing.
godless faggot
Ironic that youβre literally the most despicable person Iβve ever interacted with online and you sit here lecturing people about godliness lmao. Keep worshipping your little illusions pussy GFY.
maybe you guys can put a jpeg of yourselves on the chain sucking on eachothers big black victim cocks and spitting out the solutions you are shared?
i think itll be ready soon so there ya go!
π€£ππ
Says the guy that literally gets on his knees to pray to another man heβs never met. You must really love that Holy Spirit inside you π€£π€£
you are such an infant dude...
go hang out with your mommy, child...
Says the guy who literally refers to another man as father. Go ask your daddy for forgiveness after all these bad words you saidπ€£
Who says we are godless? Take a look at the trivium and understand first principles and you may be able to have a logical conversation.
Exactly this. The same as money, its just a mental construct that people believe in.
Well you can identify money like gold with the senses
The value is abstract though
Correct but the gold physically exists in the world. It is real, not an imaginary construct.
I'd add that value isn't abstract, it's real, but subjective.
Value is subjective but it doesnβt physically exist in the real world so itβs a social construct.
But the value people put to it is. All money is.
What gives the law authority to be applicable toward me?
Your consent - the consent of the governed.
Consent of the governed is an oxymoron. People who are governed cannot consent.
People do consent and participate in the system.
If you canβt say no, then itβs not consent
You can, but there are consequences to it. If you dont do something, like pay taxes voluntarily, people with guns will come to your house. Its up to you if you want to face that, you have a choice.
Itβs not voluntary if someone puts a gun to your head and says βyou must voluntarily pay taxes.β Thatβs like someone putting a gun to a womanβs head and saying have sex with me. Then you say it was voluntary and not rape. If you canβt say no, then itβs not consent. Just because you can choose to die or go to prison does not mean itβs voluntary or consensual.
The main thing is there is a choice. You can also leave the country to avoid it. So 3 choices really. Consent doesnt mean you aren't being coerced and an equal decision.
Thatβs not a choice. Thatβs like saying if you want to be free, you shouldβve been born somewhere else. I shouldnβt have to give up my family, friends, lifestyle, and career just to be free from government theft and harassment.
You shouldn't have to, but the majority consent, and our system is based on who is the strongest gets their way.
You keep repeating that the majority consent. But if people were asked whether they wanted to pay their taxes this year or keep all of their income, majority of people will keep their income. This is not consent. People pay their taxes out of fear. This is actually coercion. Do not confuse the two.
I concede that you could say it is compliance. I would just say, that as you know the system is coercive and still decide to participate, it is more informed consent, although you participate under duress, you could say its not true consent.
Yeah I am doubling down and calling this coercion. Itβs not consent by any means. When you donβt pay taxes, you get letters from the IRS with clear intimidation tactics. Itβll say something along the lines of you respond asap or potentially face large fines and/or imprisonment.
Imagine sending a threatening letter like this to a woman you are trying to date if she refuses to go out with you. If she goes out with you after receiving this later, she has not freely consented. She has been coerced and her interest in dating you is fraudulent.
I see that it is coercion if you view it as having no choice to pay. But you still have a choice to leave and not participate. So you are consenting because you have a choice. Choice however unsavoury to you, is still there. How about you also just do cash jobs, this is another "choice".
