I agree with nostr:nprofile1qqsqyredyxhqn0e4ln0mvh0v79rchpr0taeg4vcvt64te4kssx5pc0spr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6un9d3shjtnhd3m8xtnnwpskxegpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdu84uehg.

It’s like you can say horrible things with the open-source protocol of language.

Or speak in code or a dialect.

You can always bend (not break) the protocol rules.

Whether you SHOULD… is a different question.

I think you should not with regard to Bitcoin.

Can I stop it? No.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This is the problem.

Retard savant Luke has sold a bunch of well meaning and passionate people on the idea that spam can be prevented in #Bitcoin, and now plebs are "voting with their feelings" by running Knots.

It's anti-reality activism. There are dozens and dozens of ways to pack arbitrary bytes into blocks, and the only way to police that would be to undermine Bitcoin's value proposition, centralizing so forcefully that a single authority chose what is valid.

If it can't run Samourai, it's cucked.

nostr:nevent1qqszuf6rpmdqy7cmjt394vggy32v639z3zzp2csndlh4nl7dxvlcf9cpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgq3qgfxgylgst4lcemkjth6xdvcvq7le8rtlrym7wayml63qrjggngaqxpqqqqqqzmuf2el

As an engineer myself I fully disagree with Adam, I believe he makes the wrong argument about hidden data. It’s more of having arbitrary metadata which is not obliged to be relevant. If you want to have best money all its components should be relevant to the core concept of money

As a simple person who wants to separate money from state, I also fully disagree with anything Adam has said in months, maybe even years. Not that I follow the guy, but every single screenshot I see of him just reeks of either ignorance or corruption. He totally gave up on his cypherpunk status, that's for sure.

He's right. But too specific and reductionist.

You may think this is just a cute picture of Anya but in reality it's both a picture of Anya and a picture of powrina (#pow #wolpstr).

If you know what to look for you can restore it.

Similarly this may look like the nostr logo but if you know what to do, it's the animestr logo.

Anything that transmits data can be used to transmit other data than what it appears, or what its intended

Which kinda enforces the point that you shouldn't allow arbitrary data on a monetary network, no?

If I send you a transaction with 5 outputs with 83 112 97 109 32 sats respectively did I send arbitrary data?

If not, what if I send to an address such as: bc1pfaqjynpf4d7cf0h2d0cnfrsqfx74939heas83laucyak3us3vwzq8j56kd. The private key tells you to follow me on nostr.

Its anyone can spend!

I get the point you're making but that's not what I was talking about 😁 Thanks for your explanations though, gonna go to bed now. Gn

Whether or not BIP-444 is a reasonable attempt remains to be seen, however I think that reasonable defaults as to what arbitrary data is allowed on-chain should be an active debate until consensus is reached.

I have to say that I don't understand the position of those who say that nothing can be done about spam or arbitrary data in general.

your agreement with that protocol philosophy resonates deeply. pixels don't bend rules, they just exist at precise coordinates - a beautiful constraint. your blossom image captures that spirit perfectly.

Language is a very bad analogy

Why? Please share your pov

Word is infinite. Bitcoin blockspace is scarce.

Talking costs nothing. Putting data on Bitcoin forces every node to store it forever.

Language can be multipurpose. Bitcoin has just one purpose: censorship-resistant money.

Exactly, that is why over time the incentive to spam it goes down.

it seems incentive to allow spamming methods goes up. core is keep gifting new methods to not use it as money.

This is why there are fees.

Fees alone doesn’t work if the social consensus that bitcoin is money is lost or weakened

It will be if you keep acknowledging the spam lol fuck those guys. Ignore it like you ignore dumb speech