We need to fix lightning UX before zapping will be successful, and custodial wallets is not the solution. The reliability of custodial lightning has been going down.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

šŸ˜”

Nostr Devs, unite!

🤠

Agree..

If we think outside the box and custody solutions are sufficient for small values in Lightning, but for slightly larger values, we have Liquid, and to store Bitcoin on-chain, we have Onchain.

This perspective is based on the current understanding that custody is not the only issue with Lightning, but also the channels and the inability to exchange larger values.

Maybe…

Im zapping day and night , no issues. Alby .

Also no issues with Strike

Except Strike doesn’t work in UK/Europe.

Or Canada

So obvious Strike is up against the elite powers that be… and god knows what invasive rules it will have to comply with in order to operate in these regions.

That’s why it’s great that anyone can build on lightning. Lightning would be pretty brittle if everyone in the world depended on Strike for it to be useful.

Yep, but lightning ā€œbrittlenessā€ is not the reason why Strike is unavailable in those regions nor do I want everyone to use Strike. I simply avoid recommending it and highlight that it’s not an option for many people. The point being made here is a variety of ā€œreliableā€ lightning options for all, and that will come šŸ¤™šŸ¼

Adult workers can't use Strike.

Not saying that’s the solution for everyone. It’s just what I mostly use.

He is in bed with Visa and Banks. šŸ‘

Alby requires an invite code now apparently

What?!

Yep, and operate balance, volume and transaction limits.

stay tuned.

stay tuned.

stay tuned.

šŸ‘€

Been for months like that.

same

Don't know if it ever be fixed. I think most people will use some trust minimized solutions that will allow LN payments, things like Fedimints and Ark and Mercury.

definitely fixable, will just require smarter and more ā€œprotocolizedā€ custody solutions so you can quickly switch between providers with easy custody offramps

THIS^

fediments seems like it could improve the ux with better tradeoffs than full custodial. wdyt?

this is exactly what I think

that video you shared a while back where the dude whiteboarded it out really made it click

Link?

nostr:note1a4re397kyxzhvhkc5fy5wydxqlxwdwndeet4wh3ngskgclr39uhqzd6hvk

Grandma agrees

None of my nostr:npub1getal6ykt05fsz5nqu4uld09nfj3y3qxmv8crys4aeut53unfvlqr80nfm NWC connections work anymore. I’m back to manual zaps like it’s a year ago.

My Alby nwc seem so work well from Amethyst, so I wonder what is the issue?

I just do everything from my start 9 server now. Does Nostr relay, lightning node, and NWC all with minimal effort. But for ease of use idk how you would wrap up all that in one and make it dead simple.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA

100%

#NOSTR users are really layer 2 testers.

What can we do to help?

I have not had this experience which the funds I choose to be custodial

I think the custodial solutions have gotten a lot better recently

Is the Primal wallet custodial or no?

It uses strike so yeah

but we’re all interested in building non/semi-custodial solutions. more news on this soon šŸ‘€

There will be a big ring of liquidity (lnbig+wos) and a small self-custo device for each household šŸ˜€ connected to that ring. But that will take another 3-6 years šŸ˜”