Reminder: steak n shake does not accept Bitcoin, only "Bitcoin Lightning"
Discussion
Its bitcoin. If you read the protocol of the lightning network, all it is, it's a tunnel for the Bitcoin can move fast. Any other chain can use the lightning network
This is like saying IOUs are real gold because you can move the paper more easily than the real gold.
If I carry actual gold instead of paper and you refuse to accept it because you want me to start using paper because it's faster, you're retarded and we're not doing business.
Lying like this is worse than just not accepting Bitcoin.
Before, I would have gone to a steak and shake if I was visiting someone that has it nearby and they invited me. Now, I would say "no, you shouldn't eat there, they lie about accepting Bitcoin."
No go read the lightning network protocol
So you know who created it
Do you know how it was tested when they made it
I don't care how you've tested the paper.
If you say you accept gold, and you don't, because you're promoting paper, then you're not trying to get legitimate business, you're just running a scam.
So you can't talk about it if you don't know about it. Remember that you can't talk about it if you don't know about it and obviously you don't know about it. So stop spreading false information.
I do know about it, but people who don't know about should talk about it too.
For example, you don't seem to know the basics at all, but it would still be good if you could discuss it without lying.
It is true that you don't know what you're talking about and you shouldn't lie, but your lies about me and about the rules on discussion are still lies.
You haven't even read the protocol and you're talking like, you know about it, are you listening to yourself? I forgot you digit the troll Goodbye.
Bitcoin on Lightning is not an IOU ๐คฆโโ๏ธ wtf this guy ๐
I call it an IOU but either way it's not Bitcoin anymore so than "gold on paper" is gold
Not true.
Saying it's not true doesn't stop it from being true
Truth is based on reality, not your imagination
Facts donโt care about your feelings. Stop spreading disinformation. It is still bitcoin and it settles on my node and on-chain. You can use your argument for e-cash. But not self custody lightning. Have a great day.
You stop spreading disinformation
Bitcoin settles on chain, lightning doesn't until it stops being lightning by being converted into actual Bitcoin
You call these things "off chain" and "on chain" instead of fake and real, but then you also support businesses that claim to accept Bitcoin while restricting it to lightning, so clearly I'm right to replace your terms with "fake" and "real"
You would do yourself a big favor to read the paper. Itโs still bitcoin. You still canโt print it out of thin air. It still has to exist as a locked up UTXO. Itโs bitcoin for fucks sake. ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
So if I add the statement "it's still Bitcoin" to the facts that you can't print doggie coin out of thin air and it has to exist as a locked up UTXO, and I run a restaurant that makes headlines for starting to accept Bitcoin but we use dogecoin-only Bitcoin wallets, you're fine with that?
Or are you only OK with it when it's an asset with no proof of work blockchain, no underlying value, and no better of market performance than the original Bitcoin?
Haha what?! Now youโre just mixing all kinds of bizarre messages. Seriously, Take a step back and do some reading.
I will probably read what you type as long as it's in my inbox and seems to be written by you, so that I can respond.
I am not interested in reading random shit about the lightning protocol.
Smoke more and re-read if you couldn't comprehend.
Or quit weed entirely if you can't comprehend English as a weed user
There's zero reason I would read the paper, find a paper worth my time about a topic worth my time if you want me to read it
There we have it. He Doesnโt want to be accountable. Who sold you on your original take? Really man you need to Research your shit.
I don't need to be sold on this take, that's why I'm the main one that keeps repeating it while others haven't caught on.
I've done more than enough research. It doesn't take more than a few minutes to figure out that lightning isn't Bitcoin. I've been reading about this shit since before lightning existed, probably longer than you.
If youโre being pedantic about it maybe. Bitcoin on lightning is Bitcoin; however, if you want to be a tool about it you can technically put other shitcoins on the Lightning network. Therefore Lightning in and of itself isnโt Bitcoin itโs a protocol and network. Bitcoin passed over the Lightning Network is still final settled and real Bitcoin.
Bitcoin passed over the lightning network is Bitcoin, and gold transferred with an IOU is gold.
Passing Bitcoin through the lightning network doesn't make lightning into Bitcoin, and letting someone redeem an IOU for gold doesn't ACTUALLY turn the IOU into gold.
Since you think itโs just a shitcoin. Iโll happily settle it on my node.
lnbc100u1p58vlywsp5zyzz29tntkfxwsmn0yf3c7y982lcth4rhnmgs20haq8y95wwdcpspp53uqqmjl8pcd4pgq2ggmm5t2gkjd59gfa8ld25es8q9c5mnmkr96qdqqcqpjrzjqgfffll4jmjf0tffqtx47xt886gzp9fajp3966xz96gm2xj9cqedxrvrmuqqnvcqqqqqqqqqqqqqrssqyg9qxpqysgqvu3dmnkh6sh654yr9up3pqv00xz6yxa5h87qfhg4sn0l8vwhm9f5mhps59lgv0ser70rv2j8jjpnu8sy5qp63w0j8n4h67qd3yauwfqqe08dgr
Now your argument is "if you really believe it's a shitcoin, you should want to convert your hard money into it and give it to me, because everyone knows any shitcoin should have all money converted into it and given to me."
I really can't tell if you need to smoke more weed or less. Your brain isn't working.
Cool. Back to insults. Everything degrades to that with you. Keep believing what you want about Bitcoin over lightning just donโt confuse the new people. And research for yourself rather than believe what someone told you. Clearly that person set you off on the wrong path.
I just dissected your argument and you reply pretending I did nothing but insult you
Then you pretend the same accusation always applies with me (when it almost never does)
Then you pretend I seem to have gotten my views from someone else when I'm clearly the leading person on this topic
Any more gaslighting attempts for me or are you starting to notice you're hurting yourself more than me?
Just trying to help the new people not take the wrong path. Itโs okay to be wrong. ๐ซก
Nope. You are trying to misguide new people and at the same time passive aggressively trying to gaslight me.
Care to continue, or are you starting to notice you're hurting yourself more than me?
It's obvious you're not going to stop bullshitting in this conversation, you're set on just trying to gaslight me until your tantrum wears off
Your โargumentโ is a false equivalence. Bitcoin payments are still settled on node in real time over Lightning. I fail to see how you think this is paper gold? ๐คทโโ๏ธ
There is no false equivalence. You can pretend there is, but I will continue to explain how there is not. Perhaps you should go into more detail about this delusional "false equivalence" idea so I can go into detail about how you're wrong.
Lightning payments are still not Bitcoin payments, and Bitcoin doesn't work "in real time" if by that you mean instantly.
It's not paper gold, it's lightning. It's equivalent to paper gold because in both cases it's an attempt to represent the value of an underlying asset with more speed and efficiency than transporting the underlying asset itself, and in both cases, the proponents use it to control sheep (almost everyone) by employing gaslighting and other manipulative psychological techniques to try to brainwash people into viewing the connection as a sacred link upheld by the laws of god and nature, making the representation the same as the thing itself.
For the love. This is a bold face lie or ignorance.
โLightning payments are still not Bitcoin payments, and Bitcoin doesn't work "in real time"โ
If Bitcoin is sent. Over lightning. To my node. Itโs there. No one can take it. No one can revert the transaction. Itโs part of the 21million cap that canโt be inflated or printed.
How do you explain that this isnโt real? Youโre not making sense.
And if I exchange an IOU for gold, the gold is there. No one can take it (without stealing, same as anything). The IOU "turns into" gold in this sense, but that's kinda poetic wording, not explicitly exactly true
Me saying "the IOU turns into gold" would be fine if I dealt in actual gold, but you should instantly be able to see how retarded it is when I say "the IOU is better than gold because it's gold but faster, therefore when I say I accept gold at my shop, I don't expect you to think I will actually accept gold you bring me, I expect you to understand that gold means IOUs"
The most insane part is the actual claim of accepting the underlying asset while not doing it
A shop retarded enough to accept paper and refuse gold is a classic
But I never heard of a shop retarded enough to say "we accept gold" when they didn't - that's new lightning cult retardation
Accepting bitcoin over lightning. Is accepting the asset. Not paper. This is where your paper gold argument falls apart. Itโs not the same as accepting an IOU.
If you say you accept gold over paper, and that's accepting gold, not paper, I'll go along with it as long as you're actually dealing in gold, not paper. What you're saying would kind of make sense because we have figures of speech like "turning it into gold" by redeeming it, and if you actually do that, you have actual
gold.
I would wonder why you act so weird about it. It would seem kinda like a potential mental health issue I'd hope you'd outgrow. But it would be fair enough to respect the edgy viewpoint.
When you add NOT DEALING IN REAL GOLD, it falls apart.
I'm not gonna accept you saying "I accept gold but I'm not accepting your gold because it's not paper, and you can't blame me for the confusion because paper is gold."
At that point, I'm not going along with it.
This makes zero sense.
It makes 100% sense.
Your cognition is shutting down because you can't handle admitting you were wrong.
Ok ๐
That "passive aggressiveness" isn't helping your mental health
Iโll be sure to call a therapist ๐ซก
They probably can't really help. It still seems like you need to switch up how you handle weed. Either you're smoking so much it doesn't help your reading comprehension anymore, or you're using it too recreationally instead of using it to comprehend stuff.
Are you trying to say an invoice is an IOU? Bitcoin is still moving from Person A to Person B whether on-chain or through the Lightning network.
Bitcoin over lightning is not an IOU or Paper. The idea with paper gold is you donโt know if the paper has been over printed or if there is sufficient gold for what paper exists or where it exists. This just isnโt true with with Bitcoin over Lightning. It moves from point A to point B and itโs done.
A lightning transaction received in a custodial wallet is an IOU.
A lightning transaction sent with current technology is an IOU due to the inability to verify all the electronics and software in any network segment with 2 nodes in it (or probably even 1 node).
A volume of lightning transactions sent with similar, but more verifiable technology, would encourage custodial wallets, thus eliminating many real transactions and replacing them with IOUs, thus directly making those ones absolute IOUs, and indirectly making all the others relatively more IOU-like than actual Bitcoin transactions (which are also relatively IOU-like with current technology).
You're pretending lightning can't be "overprinted" like paper gold, when it's very easy to understand how it's possible and you've probably seen it happen firsthand. Cult brain does this to you.
Also, an essential difference that makes Bitcoin less IOU-like is there's actually a lot of evidence it can't be "overprinted" instead of obvious proof that it can.
I was very clear. My node. Self-custody. I own the channel. I own the keys. No IOU.
Youโre changing your argument, or you are finally adding enough detail, that Iโm starting to understand why youโre so confused.
I cannot verify that, so it's an IOU.
And I can verify that your statements are misplaced and cause harm, so it's a much worse IOU than Bitcoin, because Bitcoin only has the "can't be verified" part, not the "definitely insincere and causing harm" part.
Itโs a protocol that lets any cryptocurrency that implement it makes faster transactions on its network.
I didn't want to tell him that I wanted him to go read it for himself.
Oh sorry buddy!
It's okay. He's still telling me I don't know what I'm talking about. Hahaha ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
He likes spreading this miss info every few weeks. I jut donโt like that heโs so vocal about it to new people. Heโs gonna get them all confused.
Exactly my frustration ๐ซค hahahaa
Frustrating as fuck. The arrogance is asinine. And refusal to do a little research and just fire off lies. Whether intentional or not just sucks.
What you don't like is that shadowban effectiveness is slipping
You're the same kind of person that pretends nothing I say will ever matter when you happen to be in control of who sees it, but you're butthurt time can move on instead
Can you recognize that it's not actual Bitcoin or are you just here to spam the thread with more bullshit?