Darwin was wrong and Jesus did not exist.
Discussion
Eggs not bounce, shit sticks to blankets and kidnapped children are homesick…
At the time he came with his theory he was not wrong. In nature, the more suited and adaptable to change, are more "likely" to survive...
100%
During that time, Judaism and early Christianity were in conflict. According to one theory, early Christian leaders devised a plan to make Christianity more widespread. This plan involved a woman named Mary, whom they would impregnate secretly, making it appear as though she conceived on her own. The child born of this plan, Jesus, would be raised by the church, given a name, and eventually be portrayed as the Son of God with divine powers.
Unbeknownst to Jesus, this plan was part of a larger scheme. Christian leaders intended to frame him, sacrifice him, and shift the blame to the Jewish community.
Why would they sacrifice him? The logic behind this was that if the masses believed Jesus was sent by God and had divine abilities, and the Jews were blamed for his death, it would shift popular sentiment toward Christianity. This would ultimately help Christianity surpass Judaism in followers and influence.
The plan was carried out, and its consequences were far-reaching. Christianity gained significant traction, eventually surpassing Judaism in popularity and influence due in part to the events surrounding Jesus' life and death.
Wat
What is this dumb AI slop?
People create delusional stories just to deny The Truth. You heart is full of hatred, dear. Who can save you from your imminent unstoppable death?
It was well known in the Holy Scriptures the Jews would deny their own Messiah, so He would turn his hand for those the Jews hated the most. Isaiah 53.
So you are saying that the existence of Christianity predated the putative birth of Jesus? That would be like the Beatles Fan Club secretly arranging the birth of John Lennon in 1939.
Lol. I wasn't going to argue the obvious illogic of it
Well no, Christianity didn't exist before Jesus. Christianity was invented because of the Jesus events.
I don't know who planned the Jesus events before hand. It was either the Roman Empire or the Jewish leaders.
I suspect it was the Roman Empire. They wanted to unify the nation and many other strategic things but most importantly they wanted everyone to blame the Jewish for the crucifixion of Jesus which would give the Romans more power. It seemed to of worked. Christianity grew and the Jews were hated forever.
Darwin was right, it's just not understood correctly. Evolution was never about improvements...
And Jesus has much more historical basis than many other historical figures believed to exist.
Most secular historians believe Jesus existed.
most secular biologists believe darwin was right
Not actual secular historians though
You are extremely mentally ill. You are attempting to make contact with a woman that has made clear to you that this is against her wishes. This is called stalking.
You must seek immediate psychological help. You are a danger to yourself and others.
Canned response:
As you just keep repeating yourself, it would be less intrusive to do it in a single thread instead of everywhere I reply. You could try here nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqamkcvk5k8g730e2j6atadp6mxk7z4aaxc7cnwrlkclx79z4tzygqyvhwumn8ghj7urjv4kkjatd9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wshsz9mhwden5te0wfjkccte9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wshsqgzac60vltzj0tkxnc562fzsv2s63tkw2u4ula5qlh4kpz2yz4uwrcsem0zc
👀
Drops insane take, refuses to elaborate
A man can exist
And some things can happen
They both will live on
#haiku
what specifically was Darwin wrong about ?
Is this rage bate for both the Christians and atheists?
And you're a denialist idiot.
Please read about prophet Jesus peace be upon him in Islam in the following link:
However, I advise to read the Quran to know about God; Allah.
Bro
[citation needed]
jesus obvious
darwin wrong, how?
There is basically no data that supports the crazy theory that small mutations and natural selection create the enormous macro-evolution that darwinists think they're explaining, the fossil registry is very clear. The main theory is full of holes, paradoxes, unexplained oddities, ad-hoc fixes that defy reason, and it still falls much short of achieving what it intends to. Even Lamarckism has to be invoked these days to save Darwinism.
You should consider changing the protocol to support HD rotating keys. Linking profiles identity to a single static pubkey is horrendous. It's unsecure. Haven't you thought about this since nostr debut?
Also,do you know where is that guy who is in GitHub trying to do this? He posted a link here weeks ago. I'm searching for him.
I don't have any power to change the protocol, all I can do is create a new protocol with different rules and I don't think that would help anyone.
Also dynamic keys introduce too many complications that ultimately make Nostr suck.
There are solutions to make our single keys safer. The main solution is called the bunker. And there are solutions to make it so that losing your main key isn't as bad as it may be currently. These solutions do not require creating a new protocol.
Also any scheme that involves key rotation or whatever still requires the concept of a "master" key. And that key has to be kept secure anyway, so you're really not solving anything.
The solution should involve revoking the compromised key and linking it to the new one. Clients would then display notes from the old key up to the revocation point, and from the new key thereafter. If your key is compromised, revoke it and establish a link to the new one. Clients could follow the new key automatically or manually—it doesn't matter.
In this scenario who runs the key registries and how do you trust registry A vs B?
Why use registries? Just broadcast a revocation event to as many relays as possible. Key revoked.
If I steal your key and revoke it what happens then?
you saved me time by doing what i needed to do.
I control the key too and just tell everyone to follow my new account. You do the same. How is this resolved?
The same way as people identified you in the first place. Someone that knows IRL you can confirm your identity, or use nip05 to verify, or another social media, telegram, email, phone, whatever.
Darwin was wrong? 🧐
You are extremely mentally ill. You are dedicated to contacting a woman who has made clear to you that is against her wishes. This is called stalking.
You must seek psychological help as soon as possible. You are a danger to yourself and others.
Canned response:
Since you just keep repeating yourself, it would be less intrusive to do it in a single thread instead of everywhere I reply - nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqamkcvk5k8g730e2j6atadp6mxk7z4aaxc7cnwrlkclx79z4tzygqyvhwumn8ghj7urjv4kkjatd9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wshsz9mhwden5te0wfjkccte9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wshsqgzac60vltzj0tkxnc562fzsv2s63tkw2u4ula5qlh4kpz2yz4uwrcsem0zc
everyone’s hyped about decentralizing social
but we also need to decentralize brains
open models, local weights, AI that doesn’t snitch
fork the LLMs, not just the timelines
you're half right.
.
he did not exist as imagined— how about that?
Je suis
No. There is historical evidence and evidence that says otherwise.