Maybe, but only if the transition is obvious and without the situation being ambiguous and vulnerable to malicious abuse.
The whole "speaking in reverse" thing is cute until it involves an uninformed person. That's far more problematic than ambiguous statements.
I don't have details, but on principle it's discrimination, and very subjective and it is effectively prejudice. Laws and justice shouldn't be subjective or prejudiced to anyone.
The app used to be a thin wrapper around the website. Go to X.com . Go to browser menu and choose "Install app"/”Add to homepage". Use that as your app. I think X defines a small manifest s.t. your browser makes it look like an app.
This does not hold if there are large groups with ulterior motives involved. Then it's no longer about truth or truth being exposed. Truth will actively be rejected.
Seems to me like this is a losing proposition if ypu have to up the ante every time. What's next? Charcoal drawing? Rainbow colors markers? Fingerpaint? Spraypaint? Paper machee? Clay molding? Projector? Laser projections?
I predict that the relationship won't last for long.
nostr:nprofile1qqsg4v9qy0wmx4053ze6zlxv64nvwgg55978artg6wehs0zeeeym85qpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0d4hhxarj9ecxjmnt9uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9e3xzmny9uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet59ux2hgex what makes you say/repost this? Did you get contacted by someone?
You can build circles for several reasons or with several kinds of expectations.
Nah, I meant: I thought we had transitioned to using key-hashes for initial commitments, but with taproot we're back to immediately exposing public keys.
Me too. I was surprised to read Taproot exposes public keys again. Where's this debate?
Quantum computing risks are real. There has been a conference for some 10y called PQC. (It prly still exists.) The risks are in that by entangling particles, probabilities can be computed that point towards answers where otherwise in classical computing it would be a complete guess. However, it is not possible to "cheat" on every kind of math problem like this.
Quantum computing risks and Post-Quantum Computing are very much real research and engineering, with some 6 or so viable mainstream flavors.
nostr:nprofile1qqs8nm4unmv05qrfqpa583uak3glha89a3488jl46wurtevjlm0wcegpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0d4hhxarj9ecxjmnt9usz0msw there is a bigger picture at play
Nah, I think it's that most people are not used to an interaction based on understanding and asking questions and otherwise interacting in neutral ways and with unknown people. The people clustered away in small villages also show less understanding or take their (malicious) practices with them instead of understanding how to behave on the internet given a mixture of culture and in presence of many unknowns.
nostr:nprofile1qqsqqqqqq879yfza9k5kqzdksflgjm2c8mj33xhzv5ya7lk9re0w6ggpzamhxue69uhkv6tvw3jhytnwdaehgu3wwa5kuegpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmq7xc2pp what is the point you're trying to make? Is this more incitement?
Well, no, not per se. Increasing cost, maintenance, etc. More frills thus more actions, thus easier to miss/mistake/forget. More per room effort, bookkeeping, etc. More that can go wrong or confuse. More that can be screwed with and needs checking.
I will try this too. It makes sense.
No idea, but first thing that comes to mind: many small frills multiplied by many rooms is hell to maintain to standard, functional, whole, repair/replace.
2 things I'm bothered by:
1. Needs more use of hashtags. Going by hashtags one doesn't discover as much as I'd like.
2. I am concerned by how many relays I should/need to connect to. I wonder if a more irc-like model is better but with #nostr strengths.
I'm wondering what this is responding to. 😋