Avatar
ben
206e580157eae3395cdf954ff30501e16902074656a4b9493f36f896167496b2
Bitcoiner Architecture student šŸ“Philadelphia

Agreed. And we don’t need Saylors approval either. Why not just lie to the SEC to accelerate bitcoin’s entrenchment in the system. Bitcoin is money anyway

No government would approve of giving up their monopoly of money. He is simply framing it in a way that they could support. Bitcoin is money regardless. He’s using this narrative as a Trojan horse. I think people aren’t giving him enough credit

He’s not stupid. He’s latching onto the investment asset narrative of bitcoin as a trojan horse. No government would approve of giving up the monopoly of money.

Is it subject to inheritance tax? Will the government know about it basically

Today I told a family member that social security was a Ponzi scheme and she agreed with me. I am dumbstruck. Are we not weird and fringe anymore?

The same family member always send me instagram videos on finance. Mostly 401k and introduction to investing stuff. I always watch them anyway. She has no idea I’m 100% bitcoin.

Rulers are already tried banning bitcoin. I don’t think this scenario exists where 80% of the lower class understands bitcoin. The masses will never fully understand it.

Let’s look at America. States will eventually start buying bitcoin. It is only a matter of time. The federal government will likely buy as well. In this scenario the government keeps its power and is incentivized to promote bitcoin.

Only then will the masses catch on once they are given permission to do so. They will use bitcoin once it’s easy to do so and they can buy things with it. They won’t even understand that they’re taking power away from the rulers by using it.

It makes sense but maybe we just like neutral colors? If I had colorful outfits and colorful furniture, all of it together just looks stupid. We naturally like colors that are versatile and clean.

I wonder if that chart tracks bitcoin over lighting. It would paint a different story of bitcoin dominance. I’d rather have a 2nd layer chain on bitcoin than a completely different chain.

I welcome other POW chains but they will all fail because miners and users will gravitate to the dominant chain.

Nostr is proof that bitcoin works as a money right now. Slow to transact on the base layer is a feature to guarantee open audit from any user on the network. Lack of privacy is to guarantee that bitcoins rules are secure. Privacy tools can be built on bitcoin.

I’m a maxi so I’m going to argue for bitcoin. It just doesn’t make sense to me that we would have a flawlessly working system and then try to diversify into lesser options.

If bitcoin can be transacted instantly over lighting then there is no need for these other coins that try to rewrite the wheel.

Your basis on investing in those coins is that they are ā€œundervaluedā€. But they have no purpose. Bitcoin has more hash rate and is more secure. It has guaranteed global liquidity. Good luck finding a buyer when the crypto bear market starts.

There’s no maybe on doge inflation. It will inflate and for the value to keep increasing, you need an insane amount of capital pouring in.

Let’s say litecoin is exactly like bitcoin with its scarcity and POW. We already have a successful bitcoin so the only benefit of litecoin is that the cost of low - therefore there’s no benefit at all.

You can speculate on these coins but you will end of with more fiat, not more bitcoin.

The art of misdirection. If everyone is focused on stupid headlines like making Canada or Greenland a state or naming a pool of water, then he can focus on other things without scrutiny. And he gets to trigger all the Canadians hahahaha