I assure you that is not true for everyone.
Sugar is a very good source of calories if your electron transport chain is working optimally.
Not endless
facebook used to have a feature where you could view your profile as someone else (since they allow you to toggle the visibility of each picture/post)
was pretty cool
Awesome, congrats on the energy improvments.
I imagine this must be a very individual thing though. I do great getting most of my calories from simple sugars, it's starch that bothers my gut.
Yeah great idea. Wishing you lots of energy in the new year.
I've heard somewhere that raw liver contains a lot of glycogen. That might help.
da fuk u on dawg?
oh boy
I built a small Nostr in-memory datastore based on what I'm calling "microfilters". A microfilter is a filter to get a single note or author, eg `{ ids: ['123'] }` or `{ kinds: [0], authors: ['456'] }`
When an event is added to the store, it generates all possible microfilters for that event (there are just a couple supported so far), then uses stringify-stable on the filters to use as keys. It sets the event on each key.
To do lookups, you have to pass in microfilters. They get converted to keys with stringify-stable then looked up by key. The result is a key-value store that only works for filters with specific criteria. I know I'm not the first to do this. But it improves performance and reliability a lot for the most basic and common queries.
https://gitlab.com/soapbox-pub/ditto/-/blob/main/src/db/memorelay.ts
Cool idea. I wonder if there is some principled way to combine microfilters for more complex queries
This seems completely wrong to me. How could it be anything other than Geometric? I don't see how an experiment would even be necessary, it is self-evident.
If hash functions are good than doing one hash will not help with the next, which will mean each is an independent trial from an identically disteibuted bernouli distribution with p = 1/2^target_difficulty
where am I wrong?
Time to get a target difficulty is geometrically distributed which means that as the variance increases at nearly the same rate as the expected time as you increase the difficulty
I looked into this, bitcoin miners are not designed to calculate a single sha256 sum so I don't think they can be adapted for nostr POW.
And yes, but you just need a difficulty adjustment and all is good.
Reminds me that on wss://powrelay.xyz you need to mine more bits for every byte you add to the note.
Walls of text discouraged
I saw some video somewhere about someone that bought an old decommissioned hydro dam and restarted it to mine Bitcoin.
I want that
getwired.app
