What's going on?
It's so much worse than most can imagine.
Reality and truth will set us all free.
They don't even realize the royal family are German imposters. It's so tragic.
'british culture' šš
It says a lot more about the people than the selected 'leaders' when they participate in selecting these puppets.
Khazarian scumbags hiding in plain site for centuries.
Their current conduct is enough to question their allegations from decades past.
Tapped between UK and AUS totalitarianism, it's a tough spot to be in.
We didn't choose this battle, Nostriches, but it might choose us.
Godspeed. š«”
>> The age-verification rule isn't aimed solely at sex sites, but at any digital entity where racy content or other "harmful" speech could be found.
In addition to Bluesky, Reddit, X, Discord, and Grinder "have now announced they will deploy age assurance" schemes, Ofcom says.
Services had until last week to start complying or face serious financial consequences.
On Bluesky, this means submitting credit card information or submitting to a facial scan.<<
https://reason.com/2025/07/28/the-age-gated-internet-is-here/
She looks to have recovered well š
I'm glad they don't have any idea how the tech stuff works.
š¤” š¤” š¤” š¤”
Same groups of people who set a 15 minute waiting window post injection, and when people died within the first 10 minutes of that period, it was STILL dismissed as unrelated.
Impossible situation for people affected.
People were considered unvaxxed for 2-4 weeks following the COVID shot. If you died in that period, you were put down as an unvaccinated death, making it impossible to attribute any harms to the shots by official standards.
Most side effects occured within the first 2 weeks. They knew what they were doing, and most still don't get the unfalsifiable situation that was created.
Redditors discussing their own demise š
š š š š
It's not satire, but all msm is satirical.
š¤”š¤”š¤”š¤”
I think we need more censorship. Things have to get worse to get people uncomfortable enough to spring into action.
nostr:npub1a00wj229auzjswlq4s77y4u8eqdx5k9ppatgl8rtv8va65f6mwksum9q3h support is really hit or miss.
Possibly a small business being overwhelmed
Nudge, nudge.
How fortuitous to have all those ULEZ cameras up. GPT powered pay-per-mile enforcement, eventually.
Resolve will work on most distros I believe, I have it running on Mint.
Affinity Photo (You own the copy) is a great replacement for PS.
https://affinity.serif.com/en-gb/photo/
Running Affinity on Linux:
Can you steelman apophaticism?
Jane shilling, indeed.
And it is exactly this type of contradictory nonsense that made me begin to question our understanding altogether. "Nothing travels faster than light" followed by 'spooky, instant action at a distance'. It's incoherent and contradictory.
Same with magnets 'emitting' particles. Yes, an infinite stream of electrons coming from a permanent magnet that will last many decades while never running out of electrons. It's so comically childish, and we know this isn't true simply by looking at a magnet under a ferrocell. All you see are lines/waves of constructive and destructive interference, because that's all it is!
Magnets do not emit anything just like electrons are not travelling down power lines. These are coherent fields with very specific recursive geometries, and power lines are more akin to electrical field conductors. Nothing is constrained to the wires - this is exactly why we can pick up a current wirelessly without touching a wire. The wires are guiding the electric field in whatever direction they are running, since they are ideal field conductors.
Once you re-introduce a medium, call it aether or whatever you like, then action as a distance is easily explained and there is no longer a dark matter/dark energy problem. The fact that even idiots like me can grasp this while "experts" in their fields cannot is a good demonstration of how far off track we have gone.
Watch how they all instinctively panic when somebody drops something, shattering the illusion for viewers that they're floating around in zero-gravity space
These are well-paid, well-trained actors. #NASA
https://blossom.primal.net/23860084035ca0997fad502f32f9966ff1a5da835dd3a8b5e6e059ebe47cac94.3gp
"No dude, leave it!" š¤£
"Zero point energy isn't possible"
Cosmologists are furious š
We may not have degrees in your field, but we're not blinded by your dogmatic 'scientific' beliefs either. Retards š
Very slim chance they are lying to the IMF
Canada has the same tiered system as the UK and other states who are coordinating with eachother.
Retards will call it a coincidence, pattern noticers will see the obvious coordination to elicit a reaction from the public that they can then legislate and introduce extreme measures against.
This is the system at work.
"Canadian Citizens:
Tamara Lich: Facing 7 years. Non-violent protest.
Chris Barber: Facing 2 years, destruction of truck. Non-violent protest.
Immigrants:
Manpreet Gill: Involved in liquor store robbery. Wrong-way Highway 401 crash, killed 4 (including a baby). Got 5.5 months. Sentence kept under 6 months to avoid automatic deportation.
Akashkumar Khant: Tried to buy sex from a 15-year-old. Got house arrest. Judge didnāt want to delay his citizenship.
Samarpreet Singh: Exposed himself for 20 minutes inside a woman's home while installing internet. House arrest: judge cited deportation risk. "
So many directions it can go...
It's become an IQ test
Who is involved with that? Haven't heard of it
Documented **navigational errors in aviation history** have mainly resulted from general navigation mistakesālike misreading instruments, weather misjudgments, or equipment failureārather than directly from uncorrected Coriolis effect. However, the Coriolis effect does cause measurable errors in celestial navigation and dead reckoning over long distances if not properly accounted for, especially before the age of modern inertial navigation and GPS.
Notable points:
- **In early aviation**, especially for long transoceanic flights using celestial or bubble sextant navigation, failing to correct for the Earthās rotation (including Coriolis error) could result in positional inaccuracies of several miles by the time a flight reached its destination. For example, at certain latitudes and speeds, a navigational error of about 3ā3.4 statute miles could occur if no correction was made, which increased for higher speeds and longer distances[2].
- **Historical records from the RAF during WWII** mention that navigation errorsāsometimes āenormousāāwere quite common due to the limited accuracy of navigation methods, with only a small fraction of aircraft successfully finding their targets or convoys. Corrections for Coriolis (called āZā correction) were a recognized part of long-range navigation, and omitting them could add to cumulative navigational errors[5].
- **Errors over the North Atlantic**, discussed in aviation journals, commonly occurred due to a combination of factors, including miscalculated winds, instrument errors, and occasionally unaccounted-for rotational (Coriolis) effects, leading to aircraft arriving off-course and sometimes drastically correcting near destination, especially before widespread radar and GPS[8][9].
While **most major navigation errors involved a mix of factors**, uncorrected Coriolis effect could add several miles of error, enough in the days of manual navigation to result in missed landfalls or forced corrections late in flight[2][5][8]. The widespread implementation of computerized and radio-based navigation has largely eliminated Coriolis as a direct cause of such incidents in modern aviation.
Sources
[1] How Airplanes correct for the Coriolis Effect - Walter Bislins https://walter.bislins.ch/bloge/index.asp?page=How+Airplanes+correct+for+the+Coriolis+Effect
[2] Earth's Rotational Effect on the Bubble Sextant | Proceedings https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1940/october/earths-rotational-effect-bubble-sextant
[3] The coriolis effect and air travel - Physics Forums https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/the-coriolis-effect-and-air-travel.705337/
[4] Coriolis effect - The Dreadnought Project http://www.dreadnoughtproject.org/tfs/index.php/Coriolis_effect
[5] [PDF] A History of Navigation in the Royal Air Force - RAF Museum https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/documents/Research/RAF-Historical-Society-Journals/Journal-17A-Air-Navigationin-the-RAF.pdf
[6] Aircraft Navigational Errors https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/5B030FFD893667B0B446EDBAF6B44166/S037346330003112Xa.pdf/aircraft_navigational_errors.pdf
[7] Do planes have to compensate for the earth's rotation? : r/askscience https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/g0iq4/do_planes_have_to_compensate_for_the_earths/
[8] Challenges of Air Navigation | Time and Navigation https://timeandnavigation.si.edu/navigating-air/challenges
[9] Abnormal Errors and Aircraft Separation over the North Atlantic | The Journal of Navigation | Cambridge Core https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-navigation/article/abs/abnormal-errors-and-aircraft-separation-over-the-north-atlantic/3A64C4CC70C70B23A92651681DBF5E88
[10] [PDF] Inertial Navigation - Forty Years of Evolution https://www.imar-navigation.de/downloads/papers/inertial_navigation_introduction.pdf
The thing about these debunks is they are consistently inconsistent.
Here's a steelman from a flat earth debunking website.
So, we do make corrections, or the effect is so small they can safely ignore in flight planning?
