What I want is to be able to choose if I want one or not. Before even considering it, it would have to come with extremely strong guarantees of privacy, open source, completely reviewed by many, tested for a couple of decades for safety, etc.
What I fear is that not having one won't be an option, it being required by society (not necessarily government) in one way or another, literally not possible to live without, and it of course being a complete ad-, surveillance-, "nudging"-, etc. filled system, always connected to HQ. I think this is the more likely outcome, like what has largely happened with smartphones.
I'm real, currently sitting in front of my computer with a beer.
I'm sorry you had to go through that. Be well, you too. We certainly think and believe differently (e.g. I believe in the "creative and destructive force bigger than ourselves" you mention, in the form of natural processes in all different scales, such as the conditions in which life on Earth started, and the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs, but I don't think it's intelligent, it's just cause and effect since the Big Bang, possibly to some extent influenced by quantum randomness since then), but we can still agree on the things we agree on, and be friendly to each other regardless. That's what many of the people I'm talking about can't or won't.
Where is the money printer located? In de basement!
It is more about what people put in these words. Not particularly related to this context, but "take responsibility" is a phrase used by governments (at least the Swedish one, but I think more too) to say "abide by the laws that we have made" or "do what we want in excess of the laws that we made" when talking about citizens and companies, and "put more laws in place" when talking about themselves. I don't think many bitcoiners agree with that definition. If that definition is on one end, and "hold your own keys, store them securely" etc. is on the other end, that's quite a wide spectrum.
"Stay open to self reflection" The people I'm talking about are extremely selective about this. If the "self reflection" reinforces the beliefs they already have, they'll do it, otherwise no. Probably a human thing, and to some extent the opposite of self reflection, but they brag about it consistently. Bordering, if not outright, hypocrisy.
"Be confident" - not in something I don't understand. That's downright lying, and can be dangerous. (e.g. "sure, I'll take down this tree..."). I believe this is part of an American/European difference, that I've noticed since someone pointed it out. Americans see Europeans as defeatist, not confident, while Europeans see Americans as bragging and arrogant. While we probably think similarly enough, we communicate it way differently.
"stop being offended" - It's a false premise to begin with that you can control your emotions - what I guess you're getting at is you can refrain from showing it to others, and that is the definition of taking shit from people. A big reason we have got to the point we have in overreach by governments is precisely because either too few people are offended, or too few people are showing it, through letters, protests, etc.
I think I figured it out. The air is probably supersaturated with moisture, just waiting for a reason to condense out. The sonic shockwave from the lightning tips it over that limit, forming more cloud - it's not the cloud sinking down, it's a new part of the cloud.
I'll have to disappoint you by saying I'm atheist myself, but your point still mostly stands, in my view too - whatever the randomness comes from - divine power or simply randomness from the beginning of the universe and/or quantum mechanics, amplified through time- people have different circumstances and are different, meaning there is such a thing as good and bad luck. However I don't believe in the law of attraction either, and think it can even be a harmful belief in many cases (maybe somewhat exaggerated, but e.g. "if I think positively, others will do so too", proceeding to walk through crime-infested area).
Someone wrote somewhere a thing that I think is probably true in many cases with Bitcoin/Nostr people, regarding the "just world" fallacy. If they allow themselves to entertain the thought that people can be the victim of unlucky circumstances, they would have to accept that they are more lucky than someone else. I'm not sure why, but this seems to create cognitive dissonance in many bitcoiners. I think this is relevant, as many are bragging about their "proof of work", some downright denying the existence of luck. Seems like they put more value to their amount of work put down than the result, despite most of them knowing through Austrian economics that's not how value works, at least not interpersonally.
(Me still holding the amount I hold today, I see as 90% luck.)
Oh I couldn't imagine....
https://video.nostr.build/1b6899c57a9a82c9f415eb3111709bb04fc263cb6d6330b12326493cd51729dc.mp4
Rife machine?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Rife
TL:DR: a Rife machine is a machine to (supposedly) treat cancer and microorganism infections, not a diagnostic machine.
The cloud sinking down with the bolt is a bit weird though.
Thor, perhaps - it looks like it's just lightning filmed with a camera that doesn't capture the color very well, and then slowed down.
Can't say I understood everything, unfortunately, but one thing that stands out is "a lot folk don't grasp what victimhood is.". I don't think I have seen any place more eager to blame and shame victims, often for the simple fact of being victims (phrased as "victim mentality" etc.), than Nostr. I mentally correlate this with the stereotypical American, old Christian, conservative, anti-LGB-especially-T-QI+, you-as-the-man-owns-your-wife-and-(at-least-three)-kids, type, but I'm not sure how strong the correlation actually is. That type is common on Nostr, probably because they get banned everywhere else.
It's a joke regarding your typo: homophonic. It means words that sound the same, like "there", "their" and "they're".
Nope, can't see it on Satellite either.
Probably very true, despite another value that is at least verbalized often by the same people, that of thinking for yourself and doing your own research... I'd say this is a situation where "watch what they do, not what they say" would be an appropriate saying...
True. I'm with you here - I don't think you have joined them yet, but I wouldn't have expected Guy to write this 6 months ago - maybe I don't know him enough, even though he has his own takes at the end of pretty much every podcast episode, but I have seen this change in several other Bitcoin podcasts over time. They get more and more hateful (not saying Guy is hateful - yet) of everyone not conforming to this and a bunch of other more-or-less random things, though the same things everywhere.
A while since they published now, but Bitcoin Explained with nostr:npub1s6z7hmmx2vud66f3utxd70qem8cwtggx0jgc7gh8pqwz2k8cltuqrdwk4c and nostr:npub1art8cs66ffvnqns5zs5qa9fwlctmusj5lj38j94lv0ulw0j54wjqhpm0w5 talks about the technical stuff, what's new in releases of Core, etc.
In order to stick with the theme, I deleted a long answer to write a short one: It seems like bitcoiners/nostriches are one by one joining, and trying to spread, a psychologically masochistic cult whose unwritten motto is: blame everything on yourself, take whatever shit people throw at you (except fiat and shitcoins) and change yourself to suit others.
This will probably receive hate, and so will probably your comment, for "blaming others of your own problems" "victim mentality" etc. because they can't handle the truth that people are different and come from different circumstances - Empathy=0.
What's the best drink when calculating difference in time?
Delta tea

