Some extremely reliable facts that don’t get mentioned because “Muh NaRrAtiVE”…

Did you know?

• CO2, even as a greenhouse gas, has a declining marginal return on its effect? In other words, we have to double the CO2 concentration to have the same potential greenhouse effect.

— In other words, It’s like the bitcoin supply, only the first few halvings (or doublings for CO2) are meaningful in the supply change (or with CO2, the greenhouse effect change). After that it’s negligible.

— in other, other words, IF it has actually made the planet measurably warmer, we’ve already seen the overwhelming majority of any warming we will see?

• That CO2 is a *lagging* indicator of temperature historically, not a *leading* one?

• That the most reliable connection with CO2 levels and historical samples is a massive flourishing of life?

• At the end of the 1800s, CO2 concentration was in the 200 PPM range, and now it’s closer to 400 PPM. Wow! Thats scary huh? Except - 200 PPM is actually a multi million year LOW in CO2 levels and that the very ability for our planet to support plant life… and thus life at all at 150 or below is at risk. While on the other hand, the periods where life was literally exploding on earth (the literal Cambrian explosion and others) CO2 levels were in the 5,000-8,000 PPM range? That the AVERAGE is even something around 5k if I remember correctly? Something comically infeasible from merely burning fossil fuels?

— in other words, we were actually in such a horrible historical low in concentration that we were closer to a planet where life at all could have been unsustainable due to a LACK of CO2?

• That deaths and risks related to climate and weather have done nothing but plummet (like seriously drop like a rock, looks like the dollar value chart) for an entire century and are expected to do nothing but continue to plummet?

• That like 90% or more of weather/climate related deaths are because it’s too fucking cold?

• That for any honest view of the data: IF it should be expected that CO2 will alone actually cause a sustained warmer planet, that this just means more life, a healthier environment, higher crop yields, fewer weather related deaths, and that contrary to it causing a disaster, it’s more likely to have *averted* one?

You’re welcome 😚

Somebody left a whole cake and a whole gallon of milk 🤔

I guess you could willingly choose to not procure food and then starve to death, is that your point?

See those ice formations down below, some years ago I got myself into a hobby of climbing them.

The conditions aren’t quite right yet. They’ll get thicker and wider but I’m so ready.

What about the gut parasites? Is their absence related to a modern illness? Genuinely curious.

BITCOIN HAS A BRILLIANT SPAM MECHANISM: TRANSACTION FEES.

Yes that’s one example; with an abundance of electricity much more R&D would have gone into both storage and transmission. And these things tend to have a compounding effect, the scientists working on this in the 70s would have taught those in the 80s who would have worked on improvements and taught those in the 90s etc - the improvements would have compounded over time instead we had very little R&D in that space, the same as there’s been very little in nuclear as there has been a dearth of expertise.

So better battery tech would have been expected, but likely also better ways of transmitting that electricity (I’m thinking of things like Tesla built way back when) such that it wouldn’t have had to be limited to wired.

But also, it’s possible they’d have been able to use that abundant electricity for other fuel sources ala hydrogen which is today very inefficient, but possibly with 5 decades of development behind it could have been drastically improved if it could have been easily made all along.

These are the tradeoffs people don’t seem to think much about - the opportunity costs of 50 years of the petrodollar and restricting nuclear power.

Ok Nostriches give me your best answers 😂

I’ll got first; Moet Champagne 🍾

#asknostr

I boost to make a good note reach more people, and quote to add my own two sats about the note. That's my general rule of thumb.

The hard part for me is whether I should quote a note, or just leave my response to it as a reply to the note. The line for that is blurrier.

Raw Cow Milk has literally been compared to Breastmilk. Pasteurized milk which is what 95% of stores serve does not have LACTASE. Lactase binds with Lactose to allow for digestion. ONLY RAW MILK HAS LACTASE. #RawMilk

mother milk is for babies

nothing can replace that. absolutely nothing. it is nature

cow milk is for calves. also nature

nothing is better than nature

yes you need fat, animal fat. a lot. beef tallow or lard or butter (if you can digest it. you will know if you eat a lot...)

Inflation is a hidden tax.

It allows the central government to usurp the wealth of workers unbeknownst to them.

By having immutable scarcity, #Bitcoin prevents central governments from levying this hidden tax.

$BTC compels such governments to be accountable to their citizenry and to levy taxes through the political process.

Therefore, when a government seeks to ban Bitcoin, what they're really intending to ban is its accountability to the people.

What a lovely tradition! What do you use for edible ornaments? Ginger bread maybe?

no animal drinks any milk from other animals.

almost all animals, all predators like to steal and eat eggs from other animals.

eat dairy if you like it and if you can digest it.

most people can't because the human stomach is not made for it.

over time the stomach of dairy eaters in some regions in the world has adjusted , like northern europe where they could not get any other protein other than from dairy. some people can digest dairy. most people in the world can't.

even if you can, it does not mean that it is healthy and makes you live a long life.

eating only meat and eggs is healhy according to my informed opinion and also according to my own experience.

isn't it a coincidence that the same criminal groups who want to inject you with lethal substances to reduce the worldwide population to 500 million, also want to do away with meat and eggs?

The best thing you can do now is decorate it well. 🙏

Time to cut down the Christmas tree! 🎄

er.com/embedded/download/7ZmE.gif

the device must be factory unlocked (straight from google, not carrier unlocked) graphene will typically support pixels as long as android releases security updates for them. i agree 6± will be the best option. 6 - 7 have 5 year support cycles (from release date) and 8 has a 7 year support cycle.

"GrapheneOS can only fully provide security updates to a device provided that the OEM is releasing them. When an OEM is no longer providing security updates, GrapheneOS aims to provide harm reduction releases for devices which only have a minimum of 3 years support. Extended support updates at minimum will be done until the next Android version. It is likely that we will make a decision around harm reduction releases for other devices with longer lifetimes in Q4 2024. Harm reduction releases do not have complete security patches because it's not possible to provide full security updates for the device without OEM support and they are intended to buy users some limited time to migrate to a supported device."

Yeah not sure the brand, it was a pricey Japanese knife

All done ✅