Avatar
Mark Camper
b7e453f6fdeb79cca1d86fbf0c4b20ebeead1de9f5067522638d03ce9ff08e8c
Bitcoin Pleb & Econ larper. Paying bills with Product & UX. Love for the tough mountain climbs and manual labor. Currently enrolled in a Blue collar bootcamp. CZ/EN

Would be interesting to see what targeting they use for these ads. It would be more helpful to skew it more towards a shitcoin audience.

Coming to save them all. All the drowning lenders.

He really puts on display how much capital is being wasted in the fiat system.

I hope he wins it.

It's so ridiculous from these kleptomaniacs, who just overtly tried to launder hundreds of billions of our money, coming at people around the world with 100 year prison sentences for not obeying enough.

If you prosecute common citizens before you prosecute the politicians it indeed is a political prosecution.

YOU SHOULD BE ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED RIGHT NOW — THAT IS THE PROPER REACTION TO THE BTC SELL OFF

@SATOSHI MUST GET ON TV TOMORROW AND GUARANTEE ALL DEPOSITS UP TO $10M OR THIS WILL SPIRAL INTO CHAOS

Replying to Avatar HODL

Thought experiment.

Option # 1

Let’s say you have 10 bitcoin and we hit 2 million in the next few years.

You’re tempted so you sell it for 20 million dollars.

After taxes you’re be left with 16MM.

Which you use to comfortably generate 1.2MM a year in the tradfi markets.

So you take the money and retire.

Bitcoin crashes 60% back to 800k.

For a few years you feel like a genius. You enjoy your new rich person lifestyle.

You even buy back a few bitcoin. 2 to be exact. 20% of what you used to have.

Then bitcoin rises over the next decade to be worth 50 million per coin.

You’re worth 120 million now. And you decide to sell a little over half a coin and upgrade your lifestyle again to be able to generate an additional 2 million a year.

You’re now on paper worth 120 million, you generate 3.2 million a year (266k a month) and you’ve been largely stress free for the last decade.

Your kids will inherit roughly 1.62 bitcoin from you upon your death.

You have some level of regret about not hodling through, but you’ve been largely stress free and the mental health benefit was worth it in your mind.

Vs.

Option # 2

You have the same 10 bitcoin but you Hodl them.

Your stress levels are persistently higher.

You also decide to retire when Bitcoin hits 2 mil, but you decide to do so in bitcoin terms.

Your plan is to sell a little bitcoin as needed in order to fund your lifestyle.

This is roughly 1-3 million sats a month. Depending on bitcoin price.

Over the course of 10 years you end up selling or spending 2.4 bitcoin and are still left worth 7.6btc when bitcoin reaches 50 million.

Your net worth is 380 million.

You’ve reduced your lifestyle in bitcoin terms down to a million sats a month. (500k) or 6 million per year. You’re 46, Assuming you live until you’re 90 you will pass down 2.32 bitcoin to your kids.

You have no regrets about the way you played it, but your stress was consistently higher and there were a few scary months along the way.

Which option do you choose?

1 or 2?

As long as fiat exists, always consider long time loan against the BTC instead of selling.

Fund the lifestyle, keep the coin, moderate the stress both ways. FOMOs can be stressful as well.

Replying to Avatar Hurvajs Rumcajs

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/12/16/social-media-firms-told-remove-hate-speech-ofcom/

"Social media companies will be told to remove hate speech online even if they’re not sure it’s illegal.

Platforms including Facebook, Instagram and X – formerly Twitter – will be expected to establish crisis “protocols” so that they remove hate speech faster to prevent posts from going viral and inciting violence."

GB is trying hard to get the most out of the 1984 instruction manual and I'm sure the EU bureaucrats are watching it closely.

"All major tech platforms such as Facebook, TikTok, Instagram and WhatsApp will have to abide by the measures or face fines of up to £18 million or 10 per cent of their global turnover, whichever is higher."

I'm sure the CEO of Nostr is building a war chest to pay the future fines.

The country which gave us punk and hooligans, and everyone more or less going alone (seemingly).

They must have started putting something in their beers over there.

Everyone, on the floor snad start pumping those push ups right now!

Replying to Avatar Peter Alexander

Hey nostr:npub1klj98ahaaduuegwcd7lscjeqa0h2680f75r82gnr35pua8ls36xqh9t938 appreciate the shoutout. Been quiet here for a few days for this specific reasons. Have been on more Zoom calls with clients on “what is going on”?

Basically, Chinese investors operate in a closed system. There’s property, but that’s now deemed toxic.

There’s equity/stocks, but given intense volatility that asset class is also now deemed toxic.

That leaves fixed income. Investors of all stripes and colors are blowing into bonds and with so much demand yields are falling.

I would also add, or rather repeat, Keynes is Dead in China. Policy is centered on an aggressive, system-wide delivering process. There’ll be no major (bazooka) stimulus measure any time soon.

Finally, the P2P market for Bitcoin is very much alive and well here in China.

Also, yo nostr:npub1guh5grefa7vkay4ps6udxg8lrqxg2kgr3qh9n4gduxut64nfxq0q9y6hjy , hit me up anytime for a TFTC chat about this and everything “China”.

Great insights!

A full pod episode would be for sure interesting.

Replying to Avatar Hurvajs Rumcajs

https://byznys.hn.cz/c1-67511740-koncentrace-bohatstvi-v-cesku-miliardari-drzi-vice-nez-ctvrtinu-majetku-a-meni-tvar-spolecnosti-tak-jak-ji-zatim-zname

"Podíl miliardářů na celkovém finančním bohatství v Česku je výrazně vyšší než v západní Evropě a deformuje společnost."

"Proč nezvyklá koncentrace majetku brzdí rozvoj střední třídy."

Nevim jak vy, ale ja v zivote nepotkal miliardare, kterej by mi nejak branil v rozvoji.

S kterym zapadem to tam porovnavaji?

Me prijde ze CZ ma nebyvale rozvinutou stredni tridu. Asi se nekdo snazi resit *teoreticky* problem.

Saylor is doubling down hard on Bitcoin being Store of Value, not a Medium of Exchange here. Like really hard.

Worth a listen. https://youtu.be/R87vco0jHvo?feature=shared&t=4009

1:06:49 Could the government seize BTC?

1:09:08 Fiat era is longer than we think

1:16:15 Bitcoin competes with Gold, and gold has failed

1:21:08 Strategic Bitcoin Reserve

1:28:14 Proof of Reserves?

tldr "BTC is not a currency, it is a capital"; "BTC does not have to compete with dollar"; "Digital currency is tether, not Bitcoin", ...

Listening to it, It actually seems to me like he's not even believing it himself. Extra dose of rambling there.

Replying to Avatar Peter Alexander

China Evening Missive

So there was, in the end, a Politburo meeting held in advance of the Central Economic Work Conference. Now we have everyone feverishly trying to dissect exactly what the wording of the official statement means. Here’s my take; increased optionality.

What do I mean by this? Well, it should be no surprise that the Politburo centered on the applicability of both monetary and fiscal tools to support the economy. Commentary will latch on to words like “proactive” and “loose” as some sort of indication of what is intended. Honestly, it could mean just about anything. It’ll all depend on how overall economic activity trends in the coming months.

The overall aim is to widen HOW monetary and fiscal tools could be applied with the operative word here being “could”. In true Chinese fashion the details are left to the imagination. I should add that the statement did, and for the first time I believe, specifically addresses stabilizing the property and stock markets. This would align with the growing consensus outlook of an indirect household stimulus via the “Wealth Effect”. Maybe, but there remains an over abundance of caution.

This all looks great on paper as we say. From what I can gather, the policy priority remains unchanged. System-wide deleveraging. Expectations for nearly two years centered on some sort of large fiscal stimulus response. It’s not yet happened, and I remain doubtful that it will in 2025. Having said that, the Politburo – this time around – did give itself greater optionality.

Interesting. Thanks for sharing your commentary here.

Replying to Avatar paulo

Frankie. Always the good vibes. I hope he's doing well.

- they can come and force some eminent domain bs

- pay out mstr shareholders double the ticker price

- and only the next day BTCUSD exchange rate shoots to the moon

- voila, US now has bigger sovereign wealth fund than all other countries together. And it almost didn't cost anything (if you price things in dollars)