World War 2 was a titanic, mythic struggle between the Life Force and the forces of chaos and disintegration. I agree with Having said that, though, the human beings involved were imperfect, even the ones on the side of the angels.

"Safe and effective, safe and effective, BAWK pretty bird, safe and effective."

I don't see it that way. I see both capitalists and Marxists arguing over who shall do the digging, who shall grow the rutabegas, how many rutabegas everyone will get, and how much interest the usurers should be paid -- while the National Socialists throw out the usurers and work to build a civilization fit to reach the stars.

People, companies, and tribes who have accumulated a lot of capital under the fractional reserve system are a mix of people who have really benefited us by their inventions etc., and others who have engineered or gamed a very crooked money system. Some figures are in both camps. A lot of folks see this system, and the rule of these groups, as capitalism. Others have a definition of capitalism as a sort of purist libertarian/freedom ideal which has never existed.

Democracy is a terrible way to make decisions. Thankfully, Bitcoin is anything but a democracy: 1) Its users, at least at this stage, are the opposite of the democratic "masses" in that they are naturally selected for intelligence and understanding of important economic concepts (and those selected individuals will become an elite in the future, and fully deserve that status); and 2) It is ruled by immutable code, and its consensus is derived, not from easily-manipulated and dull majorities, but from mathematically-provable truths.

Many economic thinkers and hired hacks think an expanding money supply is necessary to ensure "full employment" and ever-expanding "growth." I like it that Bitcoiners are questioning these assumptions.

Why, indeed, should everyone possible be running as fast as they can at all times on the economic hamster wheel?

Fractional reserve money-creation requires endless growth to pay endless interest on endless debt. Such systems are unsustainable; calculate compound 10% interest on a 100 dollar debt over 100 years if you don't believe me: It's over $1,300,000.00. That "stimulates" economic activity all right -- the "activity" of a slave and his family who have to work for ever for their masters to pay more than 13,000 times what they were "lent" by someone with a license to create it out of nothing in the first place.

Under the fractional reserve system created by our enemies, we have generational slavery and poverty for the honest, trusting, naïve people. Naturally, our masters want to increase the (debt-) money supply forever to keep us working for them forever, and working as hard as possible. The amount that has been stolen over the generations must be staggering.

Under a Bitcoin Standard, with a fixed money supply, the honest people would accumulate generational wealth and regain their freedom. People who are intelligent, productive, and free will be able to work as they see fit, and Bitcoin finally gives them this power.

We worship our primary enemy's nonexistent god, and take a book written by those enemies as "ultimate truth " A possibly fatal mistake. See also: https://nationalvanguard.org/?s=%22Origins+of+christianity%22

Anything that weakens the Jewish power structure which misrules us is a good thing.

Intelligent. Tried to zap you.

With some 60,000 free Internet radio stations streaming 24/7, I just ignore Spotify.

This is not surprising, since Epstein's contact list contained, if I remember correctly, seventeen different ways to reach him.

Is it really a quirk, or are these accounts doing it (manually, or automatically through some kind of bot) in order to get your attention?

I'm practically 70 and still fathering children and still giving the Rotten Tribe lots of Hell, so my 100% meat-free plant-based diet must be at least adequate.

Testing the flat Earth idea with broadcast FM radio signals (roughly 100 MHz):

If the transmitting antenna is on a mountain near Los Angeles, for example, at 300 meters high, and the receiving antenna is on a Pacific island on a hill at say, 300 feet, with only ocean in between, there would be no mountains or other obstacles to alter our calculations.

Let us say that the FM broadcast transmitter is running 50,000 Watts (+77 dBm) into a unity-gain antenna, the receive antenna is also unity gain, and the goal is a 20 dB signal-to-noise ratio, good enough for decent high-fidelity reception. This would typically take a signal strength of -73 dBm at the receiver antenna terminals. Therefore, the allowable path loss is 150 dB.

The question then is, how far away could the island be from Los Angeles?

On a flat Earth, you would only be limited by path loss, the horizon could never block anything at surface level or above. So path loss strictly follows the inverse square law rule (loss increases 6 dB every time you double the distance). Running the numbers, the island could be 4,700 miles away and still give you perfect reception.

On a spherical Earth, the radio horizon must be taken into account. For the antenna heights given, the radio horizon is at 60 miles. The signal would still be more than adequately strong at 60 miles, but would attenuate very precipitately beyond that distance. So, on the real Earth, the island could be no more than 60 miles away.

There actually is a Pacific island in just the right place to use Los Angeles FM stations to test whether or not the Earth is flat. It's called Oahu. It's 2,560 miles from LA.

If Los Angeles FM stations are booming in all the time there, the Earth is flat.

If they are not, then the Earth is not flat.

Pallie, I am all for Socratic dialogue, but I do doubt that Socrates was as prone to insult and micronit-picking as you. After all, it's said he had a lovely wife and he must have won her heart somehow, and given her a good bit of his time.

As to whether Bitcoin is real or imaginary, I am no longer convinced you even have a position on the matter. If you do, you haven't stated it.

My position is that computer networks, like the BTC network, and their components are real and have physical attributes though they are also defined by instructions and processes which cannot literally be palpated. Lightning and fire -- and life itself -- are also processes which involve matter, but are not strictly matter alone.

Mercury-free shots would be a small improvement. But let's go further: I back vaccine-free shots. If people really insist on getting injected with something, let it be harmless: vitamin C for example, in a saline solution.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp8zap0xy2cqgyj4vg2p9uc9mnc0ljcrju53a98mqltqh7drc0nj7qqs9qk8mvs0z4rgz9ekvh4yvz3al3wpt0rxl8w2klej5227vz64fp4cuj9gxr

Just imagine if we had a system that, instead of saying "we can never let the people that created the Jewish state and the banking dynasties be harmed, defeated, or replaced," said "we can never let the founding race that created American and European civilization be harmed, defeated, or replaced."

No, don't think so.

Trump is showing symptoms of extreme fear -- telling everyone to stop talking about it (which NEVER works; just crazy to think it would); then the next day saying he'll release all the "credible" information; a day later saying simultaneously that the file "doesn't exist" but was "written by Dems"; then doing another 180 the next day and saying he'll get some judges to unredact all the grand jury testimony; then pivoting back to "shut up!" -- with all of this madness starting around the time the most famous living mass murderer visited him at the White House.

Whoever has the real Epstein files, whether they are in Tel Aviv or Washington (did I mention Tel Aviv?), likely wants to keep using them, and is going to hurt people if necessary to keep his position of power. I am sure that killing family members of mere presidents and congressmen is not off the table.

You know the answer to that already. Cheerio!

The writer David Sims says that if the bankers insist on their "loans" being repaid, we should ask them with what denomination -- 10, 20, or 50 megatons?

What is inexcusable, I think, is animal agriculture that, without any human need whatsoever, imprisons, tortures, and slaughters on an industrial scale highly conscious beings every bit as emotionally rich and feeling as a dog, by the billions, just because we feel like it, are used to it, or "like the taste."

Now, the question of all diets, to say nothing of house-building, causing harm to living beings is a real one. The answer, I think, is to live a life that amply pays back posterity for the harm we inevitably and inescapably cause. I don't think the unavoidable harm means we shouldn't minimize the avoidable harm. Insults ignored.

The current meat craze among freedom advocates is likely to drive away a lot of good people. And meat is totally unnecessary for human health. Nevertheless, your work is a force for good on balance.

There is a parallel with people who stitch together every 144th (or whatever) word in the Bible and get Jehovah's Secret Message for the Elect, and with the "Q" people who find the True Hidden Plan in Trump's social media posts (if properly correlated with the Dead Sea Scrolls).

The European race includes individuals with a hyper-creative intelligence that often revolutionizes our abilities and understanding, but I suspect the same genes, in lesser and more numerous individuals, just leads to wackiness, seeing patterns where there are none, Lourdes Water, and Fatima Prophecies. A good treatment of the topic is Revilo Oliver's "Is There Intelligent Life on Earth?" https://nationalvanguard.org/?s=%22is+there+intelligent+life+on+earth%22

It's a pretty ridiculous subject, I admit, but since the cult is, regrettably, being seeded into dissident political and social communities, I decided to address it

You said: "If we vaporized the human race, it would arguably be better for the universe."

I'm not so sure about that. As hard as it may be to accept when you are in line at the DMV, and acknowledging that there are some who are vaporworthy, we may nevertheless be the evolving consciousness of the Universe.

A lot of pro-Whites associate the term "White supremacy" with the mindset that advocates a multiracial society with "Whites in charge" -- like the Old South: "Yes, we run everything at the moment, so it is A-OK to have infinity Blacks with 3x our birth rate in our society so we can have cheap labor."

Israel literally assassinated the man with whom they were negotiating. These are extremely malevolent people.

So you are saying that the existence of Christianity predated the putative birth of Jesus? That would be like the Beatles Fan Club secretly arranging the birth of John Lennon in 1939.

The boomers weren't spectacularly worse, inherently, than other generations, but we were the first television generation -- and, considering the group that owns all the television networks, that definitely hurt. We were also the generation immediately after WW2, and got the strongest possible dose of "the good guys won that war" and "the postwar world democratic order is a good thing" propaganda, and that hurt a lot too.

Peterson is arguing against a straw man, and supporting the globalists. No one is arguing for local tribal affinities. The real choice for our civilization is 1) racial loyalty or 2) multiracial slavery leading to extinction. Peterson is firmly in the latter camp, despite his pose as part of the resistance.

nostr:nevent1qqs0a9uudf90885uvc3tzefuqg2a24xs4r580dw03xrtq6qgfrc38dsppamhxue69uhkztnwdaejumr0dspzpkvpty0qafs48wrg0v4w6ec2klvmdsadqx9rvzegyzeu7rmupt3hqvzqqqqqqydmjs4p