Avatar
Kevin Alfred Strom
c355e199632d69b799f6d2fcf672ca2de553b912f6eba11513907ae12d372ec5
Writer, publisher, broadcaster, free thinker. Our destiny is in the stars. Was at https://twitter.com/kevin_a_strom since 2014, terminated under Musk in 2023 within hours of an ADL demand. I prefer to use NOSTR, but I am also sometimes found on https://gab.com/kevinstrom Mathematics, physics, and genetics are the real words of God.

Ralph Manheim was a Jew; son of a rabbi in fact, despite the Aryan-sounding name. He was also an acclaimed translator, and deserved the acclaim. If I recall correctly, he translated Mein Kampf for Houghton-Mifflin. His translation is marred by many hostile footnotes, but the language is often very expressive and elegant. There are some places where the sentence structure gets a bit complex. I am going to read the Dalton translation next, since the leader of the New Order, Martin Kerr, recommends it, and says it is even better than Manheim's.

Replying to Avatar EvolLove

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqcd27rxtr945m0x0k6t70vuk29hj48wgj7m46z9gnjpawztfh9mzsthvygg nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq30mfcstxwv7gs0a4zj670l0ju0mur0t7n83andaza5y28ad4ykpqzkkjc8

I have read that but I value my own judgement over Martin Kerr's.

Seeing as how Jame Murphy was the official translator of the National Socialist party. Appointed, praised and approved for his work at the time by and for the Nationalist Socialist party itself.

Makes me deem any other translations as fake versions.

I was not annoyed by Daltons translation in itself.

Though the constant explanations ruined it.

I have read the Murphy and Manheim translations. In my opinion, Manheim's rendition is far clearer (and deeper and even poetic at times) even if more complex and even if saddled down by hostile footnotes. Sometime soon I will try Dalton.

Replying to Avatar EvolLove

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq30mfcstxwv7gs0a4zj670l0ju0mur0t7n83andaza5y28ad4ykpqzkkjc8

I deem it as impossible to both take in the whole content of Mein Kampf and at the same time learn the complete history of Europa.

I want to fokus on what Adolf Hitler wrote. As close to the original as possible.

While my overall objection to the Michael Fords translation would be that the translation in itself is really bad. He has changed the content and is using a language that is out of context, trying to simplify perfectly normal words. Which I find annoying and tacky.

Martin Kerr, whose judgement I respect, states that the Thomas Dalton translation is the best. Dalton even offers a dual German/English version so you always have the original immediately at hand.

https://cosmotheistchurch.org/?s=mein+kampf&post_type=product

Norwegian ancestry, Alaska-born here. Even the Pennsylvania mountains feel insufferably hot to me in August.

Fred Streed believes that Divine Providence is using the Jews as an obstacle that, by overcoming them, will propel that small subset of us able to do so, to a higher stage of evolution.

Despite all the regrettable mixing there, every Latin American country has a substantial population of perfectly White people there, along with others who are 90%+ White. In a few of those countries, Whites are the majority. Argentina, for example, is now a Whiter country than the United States.

Beautifully done video. I do question the inclusion of Churchill's voice, though: He lost the war and the Empire and Britain herself, all to appease the fiat bankers who really owned his estate -- and him. The idea that he was on the right side and was some kind of hero is a totally fiat, usurers' take.

Boy, those Breitbart "conservatives" are really laying it on thick. Next I expect them to be selling IDF and Mossad t-shirts and yarmulkes. And their new policy position will be bombing any US states that don't endorse "100% death" for all non-Jews in Palestine.

Replying to Avatar FLASH

⚡️💬 During a trip to Asia, Milton Friedman (winner of the 1976 Nobel Prize in Economics) visited a construction site where he observed hundreds of workers using shovels to move earth.

Intrigued, he asked the local manager why they didn't use bulldozers. He explains that it's to mobilize as many workers as possible, demonstrating the state's ability to create jobs.

Friedman replies, "In that case, give them spoons!"

This anecdote perfectly illustrates a truth that many prefer to ignore: work alone is not enough to create wealth. Employment is not an end in itself; only the creation of value really counts.

If that were the case, all you'd have to do to become prosperous is dig holes and fill them up again...

Work remains the basic ingredient, to be sure. But wealth only emerges when this effort is combined with ideas, capital, organization and, above all, risk-taking.

A job doesn't exist simply because there's "something to do". It exists because someone sees an opportunity, invests, structures a project and proposes a product or service that others want to buy.

That's probably why some people are so critical of entrepreneurs. Because this truth reveals an uncomfortable reality: in a way, work is only worthwhile if it serves others.

Yet there's nothing to stop them setting up a cooperative tomorrow, doing away with hierarchies, distributing income and facing up to the reality of supply and demand.

Why hasn't this model become the norm and a model of collectivist success? Because every cooperative eventually discovers that the real problem is not the "boss" who crushes wages and jobs: it's the state.

In France, between social charges and taxes, almost 50% of what an employee costs disappears before it reaches his or her pocket - one of the highest rates in the OECD. This tax burden stifles employment, reduces take-home pay and discourages growth.

By contrast, Ireland has reduced its overall tax rate on labor to around 25%, while maintaining high public revenues thanks to the economic growth generated. The result? An unemployment rate halved in fifteen years.

Prosperity will not come from an ever more obese and hungry state of planning and collectivism, but from a framework slimmed down to the bare minimum, where risk-taking is encouraged and the fruits of labor truly benefit those who produce them.

Only then can we all work together to create wealth and prosperity.

The truths that many refuse to face on this matter are these 1) there are quite a few humans in this world incapable of creating much of anything that others value; 2) such value-challenged humans are unequally distributed among human ethnies (that is, races are vastly unequal); 3) there are also certain individuals and groups (one group reigns supreme here) who are predisposed to cheat and parasitize the value created by others, and some of these have created very clever systems (fractional reserve banking and democracy, for but two examples) for doing so.

Well, one good quality of "alt" coins is that they automatically compensate if you over-allocate them in your portfolio. Put 50% of your net worth into Melania Coin on Tuesday; by Thursday it's just 5%. Perfect!

Replying to Avatar Bernard Marks

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqdaesgu396dnm6aauu4x5xmtjsrjg5ns6qkdz90e5sv0c59xr59zq5729v8

We should stop perpetuating a false meaning of fascism: Any government we don't like.

Simply call it totalitarianism or tyranny, but don't call it fascism until you understand what it really is.

https://fascipedia.org/index.php/Fascism

I think "totalitarianism" gets a bad rap too. What is wrong with a society being totally dedicated, in every possible way and on every possible level, to its continued biological and cultural existence, and their advancement into the infinite future? I say nothing is wrong with that.

Despite your continued insults, which I'll ignore, I do appreciate your explaining your point of view. Although I grant that Jews are an intelligent race on average, I don't think that explains their fantastically dominant position in the White-hating media, usury, or the multiple degenerate, destructive movements which they seem to produce like misty summer mornings produce poison mushrooms. I think there is also a psychological and behavioral difference: a greater racial loyalty, coupled with an almost supernatural ability to gauge (and manipulate) the feelings and thoughts of others. Andrew Hamilton's article "Empathy Without Sympathy" captures part of the picture, I think. I also think it's fair to see the Jewish community as a whole as strongly opposed to the continued survival of the European race.

https://nationalvanguard.org/2023/07/empathy-without-sympathy-2/

Also worth reading is John I. Johnson on Hayek's ancestry:

https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/10/friedrich-hayek-and-the-jews-part-2-of-3/

If the Earth were flat, FM stations from Oahu would come in strong in the Hollywood hills every day of the week. Since they don't, the Earth is not flat.

To provide the physical basis for the evolution of consciousness. And one purpose of consciousness is to create the next material world when this one reaches its end.

Therefore the job of the new leadership stratum will be to make doing the wrong thing instantly and extremely painful.

People, companies, and tribes who have accumulated a lot of capital under the fractional reserve system are a mix of people who have really benefited us by their inventions etc., and others who have engineered or gamed a very crooked money system. Some figures are in both camps. A lot of folks see this system, and the rule of these groups, as capitalism. Others have a definition of capitalism as a sort of purist libertarian/freedom ideal which has never existed.

The writer David Sims says that if the bankers insist on their "loans" being repaid, we should ask them with what denomination -- 10, 20, or 50 megatons?

What is inexcusable, I think, is animal agriculture that, without any human need whatsoever, imprisons, tortures, and slaughters on an industrial scale highly conscious beings every bit as emotionally rich and feeling as a dog, by the billions, just because we feel like it, are used to it, or "like the taste."

Now, the question of all diets, to say nothing of house-building, causing harm to living beings is a real one. The answer, I think, is to live a life that amply pays back posterity for the harm we inevitably and inescapably cause. I don't think the unavoidable harm means we shouldn't minimize the avoidable harm. Insults ignored.

The current meat craze among freedom advocates is likely to drive away a lot of good people. And meat is totally unnecessary for human health. Nevertheless, your work is a force for good on balance.

There is a parallel with people who stitch together every 144th (or whatever) word in the Bible and get Jehovah's Secret Message for the Elect, and with the "Q" people who find the True Hidden Plan in Trump's social media posts (if properly correlated with the Dead Sea Scrolls).

The European race includes individuals with a hyper-creative intelligence that often revolutionizes our abilities and understanding, but I suspect the same genes, in lesser and more numerous individuals, just leads to wackiness, seeing patterns where there are none, Lourdes Water, and Fatima Prophecies. A good treatment of the topic is Revilo Oliver's "Is There Intelligent Life on Earth?" https://nationalvanguard.org/?s=%22is+there+intelligent+life+on+earth%22

It's a pretty ridiculous subject, I admit, but since the cult is, regrettably, being seeded into dissident political and social communities, I decided to address it

You said: "If we vaporized the human race, it would arguably be better for the universe."

I'm not so sure about that. As hard as it may be to accept when you are in line at the DMV, and acknowledging that there are some who are vaporworthy, we may nevertheless be the evolving consciousness of the Universe.

Replying to Avatar Roscoe

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqx9qhkh8tl22vxlcs9xs2y5jt5wu45kzkppjeuw8t5leardhulzhsjc7wdu

A lot of Whites are uncomfortable defining themselves using jew-created slurs.

And a lot of Whites are uncomfortable embracing their supremacy.

That will fade in time.

A lot of pro-Whites associate the term "White supremacy" with the mindset that advocates a multiracial society with "Whites in charge" -- like the Old South: "Yes, we run everything at the moment, so it is A-OK to have infinity Blacks with 3x our birth rate in our society so we can have cheap labor."

Israel literally assassinated the man with whom they were negotiating. These are extremely malevolent people.

The boomers weren't spectacularly worse, inherently, than other generations, but we were the first television generation -- and, considering the group that owns all the television networks, that definitely hurt. We were also the generation immediately after WW2, and got the strongest possible dose of "the good guys won that war" and "the postwar world democratic order is a good thing" propaganda, and that hurt a lot too.