I figured out my #Primal relay issue. Primal still uses Kind 3 - whilst everyone else has migrated to Kind 10002.

I modified my relays in primal while using nak's stream feature to see what it would write to the Primal relay - and wouldn't you know, it wrote a kind 3.

Welp... that's quite good to know. Time to write a command to automatically convert my 10002 list to kind 3 whenever I change anything somewhere else...

slowly getting over whatever part of my ego that was convinced michael saylor was just an insane corporate larper

“that dude is too midcurve to be correct, right? isnt doing that share issuance/dilution thing going to get him rekt?? at what point exactly does his board dump his insane ass?”

no no, turns out he’s probably the “right” amount of long term thinking and all in conviction

which is legitimately insane behavior but dear god

correct me if im wrong but one thing that feels very rare thing about saylor, situationally, is that he’s a successful dude who maintained his ability to keep placing interesting bets

seems like other wealthy people stop exploring at some point? or get afraid of losing it all? or are so consumed with other stuff or get weighed down by boards etc that they lose either the ability to bet big or the foresight

bitcoin really has done an insane job living up to being the realm of the self-sovereign 🤔

I’m unsupervised 😳

Bitcoin Twitter getting Xcoin zaps! Happy for them. nostr:note1phfda3kpz0ucf8elfyyr4gs70ztqsher55gxmgpptu8cfaq6xz4s8nkt5r

Why do big transactions have more impact? Do you mean big as in payload size? Like batch transactions, consolidations and coin joins?

Because big in sats doesn't affect the bottom line for miners, maybe for users who are eyeballing the network, but not for the rest of us, and not if the fork has a rule change with it.

I don't see what's wrong about that perspective. Once financial institutions come into the picture the game gets more complex.

Sad how far he's fallen

$boost

I don't understand your question. Bitcoin is Open Source. We're all #Bitcoin. We're all Bitcoin's developers.

Especially virtuous full nodes, and Bitcoin loyalist. Are you asking do I know how to code? Yes, long before you were born.

But #Satoshi already wrote the #code. All we have to do is not break it lol..🧡😊🦍

I disagree with this. It assumes that etf based activity will translate to on chain activity.

The thing is that these custodians are centralised and will optimise to save on fees while of course marking up their profits.

It's not the number of nodes, nor the number of bitcoin you have that influences the network. It's the on chain activity. ETFs will be pre-bought and bulk bought.

A large transaction is nothing, many small transactions is everything. It doesn't matter what the big bitcoiner wants to do, just what the majority of "users" want to do.

This also means lightning users are also exempt for the most part too btw.

$boost

Lol.. the Owners and Users of Actual #Bitcoin will oppose changing Bitcoin in any way that displeases THEM!

Especially the node operators like me. This is the power of Open Source. I don't like the scammy, abusive crap that's been going on lately.

Fortunately, neither do many of us. We have the power to edit, modify and change the code. And that's what we're doing.

If I have anything to say about it. The code will be so pure and tight Again! that scammers will continue to shit their pants..😠🧡😊🦍

A big holder has the same power over the protocol as a small holder. They will not have more power or more votes because they hold a majority of bitcoin. Are you sure it's the right Andreas?

And how comes this guy is not on nostr!

Test from Coracle Private Group.

He's saying institutional ETF investors will oppose changing bitcoin in ways that displease their masters.

I need some help understanding what is being said here...